SEC ALLEGES INDIVIDUALS AT DEFUNCT ELECTRONICS COMPANY COOKED THE BOOKS

The following excerpt is from the SEC website: December 2, 2011 “The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) announced today that it filed charges against three individuals who participated in a securities fraud scheme at Soyo Group, Inc. (“Soyo”), a now defunct California-based consumer electronics and computer parts company. The Commission’s civil injunctive complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on November 29, 2011, alleges that between January 2007 and November 2008, Soyo, through the actions of its chief financial officer, Nancy Shao Wen Chu, and members of her accounting staff, Elizabeth Tsang and Eric Jon Strasser, misled Soyo’s investors, primary lending bank, and auditor by materially overstating Soyo’s net revenues and understating its liabilities. According to the complaint, Chu and Tsang caused Soyo to book over $47 million in fraudulent sales revenues arising from at least 120 fictitious transactions with 21 customers, resulting in Soyo materially overstating its net revenues in its periodic filings by amounts ranging from 14.4 to 76.8 percent. The complaint also alleges that in order to obtain additional bank financing for Soyo and keep its existing line of credit from defaulting, Chu misled Soyo’s investors, primary lending bank, and auditor regarding a $6 million debt-for-equity transaction with a Soyo vendor that was never completed. The complaint further alleges that Strasser, a consultant who prepared Soyo’s filings with the Commission, was alerted to the falsity of the debt-for-equity transaction disclosures, but he failed to correct the misstatements or inform Soyo’s auditor prior to the next quarter’s filing. The Commission’s complaint alleges that, as a result of their conduct, Chu and Tsang violated, and unless enjoined, will continue to violate, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder and that Strasser aided and abetted an antifraud violation. The complaint also alleges that Chu violated, and unless enjoined, will continue to violate Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, and is liable as a control person for Soyo’s antifraud violations. As part of this action, the Commission seeks against each of the defendants an injunction against future violations of the provisions set forth above, disgorgement, pre-judgment interest, third tier civil money penalties and, as to Chu, an officer and director bar.”

SEC CHARGED RAYMOND JAMES & ASSOCIATES INC. WITH MAKING INACCURATE STATEMENTS

The following excerpt comes from the SEC website:
“Washington, D.C., June 29, 2011 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged Raymond James & Associates Inc. and Raymond James Financial Services Inc. for making inaccurate statements when selling auction rate securities (ARS) to customers.
Raymond James agreed to settle the SEC’s charges and provide its customers the opportunity to sell back to the firm any ARS that they bought prior to the collapse of the ARS market in February 2008.
According to the SEC’s administrative order, some registered representatives and financial advisers at Raymond James told customers that ARS were safe, liquid alternatives to money market funds and other cash-like investments. In fact, ARS were very different types of investments. Among other things, representatives at Raymond James did not provide customers with adequate and complete disclosures regarding the complexity and risks of ARS, including their dependence on successful auctions for liquidity. “Raymond James improperly marketed and sold ARS to customers as safe and highly liquid alternatives to money market accounts and other short-term investments,” said Eric I. Bustillo, Director of the SEC’s Miami Regional Office. “Harmed investors who are covered by this settlement will have the opportunity to get full payment for their illiquid ARS.”
The SEC previously announced ARS settlements with Citigroup and UBS, Wachovia, Bank of America, RBC Capital Markets, Deutsche Bank, and TD Ameritrade. As a result of these settlements, more than $67 billion has been returned to ARS customers following the SEC’s investigation into the ARS market collapse of February 2008 that left tens of thousands of investors holding ARS they could not sell. The SEC’s order against Raymond James finds that the firm willfully violated Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. The Commission censured Raymond James, ordered it to cease and desist from future violations, and reserved the right to seek a financial penalty against the firm. Without admitting or denying the SEC’s allegations, Raymond James consented to the SEC’s order and agreed to:
Offer to purchase eligible ARS from its eligible current and former customers. Use its best efforts to provide liquidity solutions to customers who acted as institutional money managers who are not otherwise eligible customers. > Reimburse excess interest costs to eligible ARS customers who took out loans from Raymond James after Feb. 13, 2008. Compensate eligible customers who sold their ARS below par by paying the difference between par and the sale price of the ARS, plus reasonable interest. At the customer’s election, participate in a special arbitration process with those eligible customers who claim additional damages.
Establish a toll-free telephone assistance line and a public Internet page to respond to questions concerning the terms of the settlement.
Investors should be alerted that, in most instances, they will receive correspondence from Raymond James. Investors must then advise Raymond James that they elect to participate in the settlement. If they do not do so, they could lose their rights to sell their ARS to Raymond James. Investors should review the full text of the SEC’s order, which includes the terms of the settlement. The Commission acknowledges the assistance and cooperation of the State of Florida Office of Financial Regulation, the Texas State Securities Board, and the North American Securities Administrators Association.”
Although financial penalties are becoming more common in cases like the one above criminal penalties are not really increasing. The problem is that it is hard to link upper levels of management with a business decision to commit a crime. A word used like “puffery” when selling a product is often confused with the word “fraud” by over zealous salespeople who are trying to earn a commission or large bonus check and pay their bills. Commission sales by definition; means that Salespeople are paid by their employers to talk up their products and overcome objections. This is a slippery slope and top management is responsible for making sure those directly offering the products to the public do not slip off the “slippery slope” and say things that might earn a nice check now but in the long run will seriously harm the reputation of the firm they are working for."

ACHOVIA BANK N.A WILL PAY $148 MILLION FOR ANTICOMPETITIVE CONDUCT

The folowing excerpt is from the Department of Justice website: "WACHOVIA BANK N.A. ADMITS TO ANTICOMPETITIVE CONDUCT BY FORMER EMPLOYEES IN THE MUNICIPAL BOND INVESTMENTS MARKET AND AGREES TO PAY $148 MILLION TO FEDERAL AND STATE AGENCIES WASHINGTON — Wachovia Bank N.A., which is now known as Wells Fargo Bank N.A., has entered into an agreement with the Department of Justice to resolve the company’s role in anticompetitive activity in the municipal bond investments market and has agreed to pay a total of $148 million in restitution, penalties and disgorgement to federal and state agencies, the Department of Justice announced today. As part of its agreement with the department, Wachovia admits, acknowledges and accepts responsibility for illegal, anticompetitive conduct by its former employees. According to the non-prosecution agreement, from 1998 through 2004, certain former Wachovia employees at its municipal derivatives desk entered into unlawful agreements to manipulate the bidding process and rig bids on municipal investment and related contracts. These contracts were used to invest the proceeds of, or manage the risks associated with, bond issuances by municipalities and other public entities. “The illegal conduct at Wachovia Bank corrupted the bidding practices for investment contracts and deprived municipalities of the competitive process to which they were entitled,” said Sharis A. Pozen, Acting Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division. “Today’s resolution achieves restitution for the victims harmed by Wachovia’s anticompetitive conduct and ensures that Wachovia disgorges its ill-gotten gains and pays penalties for its illegal conduct. We are committed to ensuring competition in the financial markets and our investigation into anticompetitive conduct in the municipal bond derivatives industry continues.” Under the terms of the agreement, Wachovia agrees to pay restitution to victims of the anticompetitive conduct and to cooperate fully with the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division in its ongoing investigation into anticompetitive conduct in the municipal bond derivatives industry. To date, the ongoing investigation has resulted in criminal charges against 18 former executives of various financial services companies and one corporation. Nine of the 18 executives charged have pleaded guilty. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and 26 state attorneys general also entered into agreements with Wachovia requiring the payment of penalties, disgorgement of profits from the illegal conduct and payment of restitution to the victims harmed by the manipulation and bid rigging by Wachovia employees, as well as other remedial measures. As a result of Wachovia’s admission of conduct; its cooperation with the Department of Justice and other enforcement and regulatory agencies; its monetary and non-monetary commitments to the SEC, IRS, OCC and state attorneys general; and its remedial efforts to address the anticompetitive conduct, the department agreed not to prosecute Wachovia for the manipulation and bid rigging of municipal investment and related contracts, provided that Wachovia satisfies its ongoing obligations under the agreement. Earlier this year, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and UBS AG also entered into agreements with the Department of Justice and other federal and state agencies to resolve anticompetitive conduct in the municipal bond derivatives market. In July 2011, JPMorgan agreed to pay a total of $228 million in restitution, penalties and disgorgement to federal and state agencies for its role in the conduct. In May 2011, UBS AG agreed to pay a total of $160 million in restitution, penalties and disgorgement to federal and state agencies for its participation in the anticompetitive conduct. The department’s ongoing investigation into the municipal bonds industry is being conducted by the Antitrust Division, the FBI and the IRS-Criminal Investigation. The department is coordinating its investigation with the SEC, the OCC and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The department thanks the SEC, IRS, OCC and state attorneys general for their cooperation and assistance in this matter. The Antitrust Division, SEC, IRS, FBI, state attorneys general and OCC are members of the Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force. President Obama established the interagency task force to wage an aggressive, coordinated and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes. The task force includes representatives from a broad range of federal agencies, regulatory authorities, inspectors general and state and local law enforcement who, working together, bring to bear a powerful array of criminal and civil enforcement resources. The task force is working to improve efforts across the federal executive branch, and with state and local partners, to investigate and prosecute significant financial crimes, ensure just and effective punishment for those who perpetrate financial crimes, combat discrimination in the lending and financial markets, and recover proceeds for victims of financial crimes."

WACHOVIA BANK N.A. CHARGED BY SEC WITH BID RIGGING IN MUNICIPAL BOND MARKET

The following excerpt is from the SEC website: “Washington, D.C., Dec. 8, 2011 – The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged Wachovia Bank N.A. with fraudulently engaging in secret arrangements with bidding agents to improperly win business from municipalities and guarantee itself profits in the reinvestment of municipal bond proceeds. The SEC alleges that Wachovia generated millions of dollars in illicit gains during an eight-year period when it fraudulently rigged at least 58 municipal bond reinvestment transactions in 25 states and Puerto Rico. Wachovia won some bids through a practice known as “last looks” in which it obtained information from the bidding agents about competing bids. It also won bids through “set-ups” in which the bidding agent deliberately obtained non-winning bids from other providers in order to rig the field in Wachovia’s favor. Wachovia facilitated some bids rigged for others to win by deliberately submitting non-winning bids. Wachovia agreed to settle the charges by paying $46 million to the SEC that will be returned to affected municipalities or conduit borrowers. Wachovia also entered into agreements with the Justice Department, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Internal Revenue Service, and 26 state attorneys general that include the payment of an additional $102 million. The settlements arise out of long-standing parallel investigations into widespread corruption in the municipal securities reinvestment industry in which 18 individuals have been criminally charged by the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division. “Wachovia won bids by playing an elaborate game of ‘you scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours,’ rather than engaging in legitimate competition to win municipalities’ business.” said Robert Khuzami, Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement. Elaine C. Greenberg, Chief of the SEC’s Municipal Securities and Public Pensions Unit, added, “Wachovia hid its fraudulent practices from municipalities by affirmatively assuring them that they had not engaged in any manipulative conduct. This settlement will result in significant payments to municipalities harmed by Wachovia’s unlawful actions.” Wachovia Bank is now Wells Fargo Bank following a merger in March 2010. When municipal securities are sold to investors, portions of the proceeds often are not spent immediately by municipalities but rather temporarily invested in municipal reinvestment products until the money is used for the intended purposes. These products are typically financial instruments tailored to meet municipalities’ specific collateral and spend-down needs, such as guaranteed investment contracts (GICs), repurchase agreements (repos), and forward purchase agreements (FPAs). The proceeds of tax-exempt municipal securities generally must be invested at fair market value, and the most common way of establishing that is through a competitive bidding process in which bidding agents search for the appropriate investment vehicle for a municipality. According to the SEC’s complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, Wachovia engaged in fraudulent bidding of GICs, repos, and FPAs from at least 1997 to 2005. Wachovia’s fraudulent practices and misrepresentations not only undermined the competitive bidding process, but negatively affected the prices that municipalities paid for reinvestment products. Wachovia deprived certain municipalities from a conclusive presumption that the reinvestment instruments had been purchased at fair market value, and jeopardized the tax-exempt status of billions of dollars in municipal securities because the supposed competitive bidding process that establishes the fair market value of the investment was corrupted. Without admitting or denying the allegations in the SEC’s complaint, Wachovia has consented to the entry of a final judgment enjoining it from future violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and has agreed to pay a penalty of $25 million and disgorgement of $13,802,984 with prejudgment interest of $7,275,607. The settlement is subject to court approval. Financial institutions have now paid a total of $673 million in settlements resulting from the ongoing investigations into corruption in the municipal reinvestment industry. Others charged prior to Wachovia are: J.P. Morgan Securities LLC – $228 million settlement with SEC and other federal and state authorities on July 7, 2011. UBS Financial Services Inc. – $160 million settlement with SEC and other federal and state authorities on May 4, 2011. Banc of America Securities LLC – $137 million settlement with SEC and other federal and state authorities on Dec. 7, 2010. In a related action to the Banc of America matter, the SEC today charged the firm’s former vice president and marketer Dean Pinard for his role in various improper bidding practices. Pinard is the beneficiary of a grant of conditional amnesty from criminal prosecution by the Department of Justice provided to Banc of America’s parent corporation. Pinard, who cooperated with the investigation, agreed to pay more than $40,000 to settle the SEC’s case without admitting or denying the findings. He is barred from association with any broker, dealer, investment adviser, municipal securities dealer, or municipal advisor. The SEC’s investigation, which is continuing, has been conducted by Deputy Chief Mark R. Zehner and Assistant Municipal Securities Counsel Denise D. Colliers, who are members of the Municipal Securities and Public Pensions Unit in the Philadelphia Regional Office. The SEC thanks the other agencies with which it has coordinated this enforcement action, including the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Internal Revenue Service, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and 26 State Attorneys General.”

ASSETS OF FOUR CHINESE CITIZENS FROZEN BY SEC FOR INSIDER TRADING

The following excerpt is from the SEC website: “Washington, D.C., Dec. 6, 2011 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that it has frozen the assets of four Chinese citizens and a Chinese-based entity charged with insider trading in advance of a merger announcement by educational companies based in London and Beijing. The SEC moved quickly to obtain an emergency court order to freeze assets just two weeks after the suspicious trading by Sha Chen, Song Li, Lili Wang, and Zhi Yao, who have U.S.-based brokerage accounts. Some of them already attempted to liquidate or transfer their illicit profits. The SEC alleges that they purchased American Depository Shares (ADS) of Beijing-based Global Education and Technology Group in the two weeks leading up to a November 21 public announcement of a planned merger with London-based Pearson plc. Some of their brokerage accounts were dormant until they bet heavily on Global Education shares, and some of the purchases made either equaled or exceeded the stated annual income of that trader. After the agreement was announced, they immediately began selling some of their Global Education shares. Their illicit gains totaled more than $2.7 million. “On the basis of non-public information, these traders suddenly purchased massive amounts of Global Education shares in U.S. brokerage accounts that had been largely inactive,” said Merri Jo Gillette, Director of the SEC’s Chicago Regional Office. “We’re pleased the court immediately granted our order to freeze these accounts before proceeds from the illegal trades could be transferred outside U.S. jurisdiction.” The SEC also charged All Know Holdings Ltd. and one or more unknown purchasers of Global Education stock in its complaint filed on December 5 in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. According to the SEC’s complaint, Pearson and Global Education each announced before trading began on November 21 that Pearson agreed to acquire all of Global Education’s outstanding stock for $294 million ($11.006 per share traded in the U.S.). Global Education’s stock price increased 97 percent that day, from $5.37 to $10.60. The SEC alleges that Chen, Li, Wang, and Yao made their purchases of Global Education’s ADS shares while in possession of material, non-public information about the merger. A Global Education co-founder and Chairman of the Board apparently tipped Wang and possibly others about the potential acquisition. Wang then transferred new funds into her previously dormant brokerage account and bought 28,000 Global Education shares. The others also engaged in similarly suspicious trading in Global Education stock, which was typically thin. On November 18, the last trading day before the acquisition announcement, their purchases accounted for more than 35 percent of the entire day’s trading volume for the company’s shares, which trade on the NASDAQ. The SEC alleges that the defendants each violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. In addition to the emergency relief, the SEC seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest, and financial penalties. The emergency court order that the SEC obtained on December 5 on an ex parte basis freezes more than $2.7 million of defendants’ assets held in U.S. brokerage accounts and, among other things, grants expedited discovery and prohibits the defendants from destroying evidence. The SEC’s investigation, which is continuing, has been conducted by Allison M. Fakhoury, Brian N. Hoffman, Steven L. Klawans, Delia L. Helpingstine, John E. Kustusch, Felisha K. Clay and Terri Y. Roberts in the Chicago Regional Office. The SEC’s litigation effort will be led by Benjamin J. Hanauer and Daniel J. Hayes. The Commission thanks the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority for its assistance in this matter.”

SEC SETTLES WITH PARIDON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS

SEC RESOLVES FRAUD-BASED LAWSUIT AGAINST CHICAGO-AREA HEDGE FUND ADVISER AND ITS OWNER The following excerpt is from the SEC website: “The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that on November 17 Judge John F. Grady of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois entered a final judgment against Jeffrey R. Neufeld (Neufeld) and Paridon Capital Management LLC (Paridon) of Elgin, Illinois for defrauding the TCM Global Strategy Fund (TCM Fund or the fund), a hedge fund, and its investors. Without admitting or denying the Commission’s allegations, Neufeld and Paridon consented to the entry of the final judgment which imposed a $75,000 civil penalty against Neufeld. Previously, on April 27, 2011, the Court permanently enjoined Neufeld and Paridon from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Sections 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Sections 206(1), 206(2), 206(3), and 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Rule 206(4)-8 thereunder. Neufeld and Paridon also consented to pay disgorgement and prejudgment interest of $53,182.33 to an injured investor. According to the Commission’s complaint, Paridon, an investment adviser, and its owner, Neufeld, fraudulently operated the TCM Fund since 2006. Neufeld and Paridon allegedly lied about the fund’s assets under management and reported inflated returns that were not based on actual trading. They also used fictitious returns to lure investors into the TCM Fund. The complaint also alleges that Neufeld and Paridon caused the fund to use a significant portion of its investor money to buy “debt securities” issued by Paridon. Although called debt securities, this investment was in reality a loan from the fund to Paridon. The debt securities were also not permitted investments for the fund, were not disclosed and consented to by the fund, and were improperly marked up by Neufeld and Paridon to offset and hide significant trading losses.”