This is a photo of the National Register of Historic Places listing with reference number 7000063
Thursday, August 15, 2013
STOCK PROMOTERS CHARGED BY SEC IN MARKET MANIPULATION CASE
FROM: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SEC Charges Stock Promoters with Market Manipulation
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it filed a civil injunctive action against Cort Poyner ("Poyner") and Mohammad Dolah ("Dolah"), alleging that they engaged in a fraudulent broker bribery scheme designed to manipulate the market for the common stock of Resource Group International, Inc. ("Resource Group") and Gold Rock Resources Inc. ("Gold Rock").
The complaint, filed on July 31, 2013 in federal court in Brooklyn, New York, alleges that Poyner, a recidivist securities violator, and Dolah engaged in an undisclosed kickback arrangement with an individual ("Individual A") whom they believed represented a group of registered representatives that solicited customer purchases of stock in exchange for undisclosed kickbacks. Poyner and Dolah promised to pay between 25% - 35% in kickbacks to Individual A and the registered representatives he represented in exchange for the purchase of up to $2 million of Resource Group stock and $1 million in Gold Rock stock through the customers' accounts.
The complaint further alleges that between December 11, 2008 and May 11, 2009, Poyner and Dolah instructed Individual A to purchase 800,000 shares of Resource Group stock for a total of $50,000, and Dolah instructed Individual A to purchase 20,000 shares of Gold Rock stock for a total of $20,400. Thereafter, Poyner and Dolah paid Individual A cash bribes totaling $14,000 for those purchases.
The complaint charges Poyner and Dolah with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. The Commission seeks permanent injunctive relief, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, if any, plus pre-judgment interest, and civil penalties from Poyner and Dolah, a judgment prohibiting Dolah from participating in any offering of penny stock, and an order prohibiting Poyner from acquiring, disposing or promoting any penny stock.
SEC Charges Stock Promoters with Market Manipulation
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it filed a civil injunctive action against Cort Poyner ("Poyner") and Mohammad Dolah ("Dolah"), alleging that they engaged in a fraudulent broker bribery scheme designed to manipulate the market for the common stock of Resource Group International, Inc. ("Resource Group") and Gold Rock Resources Inc. ("Gold Rock").
The complaint, filed on July 31, 2013 in federal court in Brooklyn, New York, alleges that Poyner, a recidivist securities violator, and Dolah engaged in an undisclosed kickback arrangement with an individual ("Individual A") whom they believed represented a group of registered representatives that solicited customer purchases of stock in exchange for undisclosed kickbacks. Poyner and Dolah promised to pay between 25% - 35% in kickbacks to Individual A and the registered representatives he represented in exchange for the purchase of up to $2 million of Resource Group stock and $1 million in Gold Rock stock through the customers' accounts.
The complaint further alleges that between December 11, 2008 and May 11, 2009, Poyner and Dolah instructed Individual A to purchase 800,000 shares of Resource Group stock for a total of $50,000, and Dolah instructed Individual A to purchase 20,000 shares of Gold Rock stock for a total of $20,400. Thereafter, Poyner and Dolah paid Individual A cash bribes totaling $14,000 for those purchases.
The complaint charges Poyner and Dolah with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. The Commission seeks permanent injunctive relief, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, if any, plus pre-judgment interest, and civil penalties from Poyner and Dolah, a judgment prohibiting Dolah from participating in any offering of penny stock, and an order prohibiting Poyner from acquiring, disposing or promoting any penny stock.
Tuesday, August 13, 2013
SEC OBTAINS EMERGENCY COURT ORDER TO STOP HEDGE FUND FROM DEFRAUDING MILITARY PERSONNEL
FROM: U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SEC Halts Ex-Marine’s Hedge Fund Fraud Targeting Fellow Military
Washington D.C., Aug. 6, 2013
The Securities and Exchange Commission obtained an emergency court order to halt a hedge fund investment scheme by a former Marine living in the Chicago area who has been masquerading as a successful trader to defraud fellow veterans, current military, and other investors.
The SEC alleges that Clayton A. Cohn and his hedge fund management firm Market Action Advisors raised nearly $1.8 million from investors through a hedge fund he managed. Cohn lied to investors about his success as a trader, the performance of the hedge fund, his use of investor proceeds, and his personal stake in the hedge fund. Cohn only invested less than half of the money raised from investors and instead used more than $400,000 for such personal expenses as a Hollywood mansion, luxury automobile, and extravagant tabs at high-end nightclubs. He used his lavish lifestyle to carefully contrive the image of a successful trader and investor, when in reality he lost nearly all of the money invested through the hedge fund. In order to cover up his fraud and continue raising money from investors, Cohn generated phony hedge fund account statements showing annual returns exceeding 200 percent.
“Cohn lured fellow military and other investors into his hedge fund by portraying himself as a successful trader who generated massive returns for his investors,” said Timothy L. Warren, Acting Director of the Chicago Regional Office. “But Cohn’s hedge fund investors didn’t have a chance to make a profit since he never invested most of their money and promptly lost the portion he did invest.”
According to the SEC’s complaint filed in federal court in Chicago, Cohn targets mostly unsophisticated investors and has solicited friends, family members, and fellow veterans to invest in his hedge fund. Cohn controls a so-called charity called the Veterans Financial Education Network (VFEN) that purports to teach veterans how to understand and manage their money. Cohn has touted his Marine Corps pedigree in VFEN press releases and encourages veterans to find “a money-manager who is both trustworthy and knows what he is doing.” VFEN’s website identifies Cohn as a money manager who “manages millions of dollars.”
According to the SEC’s complaint, Cohn managed his hedge fund Market Action Capital Management through his investment advisory firm Market Action Advisors, which is registered with the state of Illinois. Cohn solicited investments by falsely claiming that he had major success as a personal trader and invested $1.5 million of his own money in the hedge fund. He also misrepresented that an accounting firm would audit the hedge fund’s financial statements.
The SEC alleges that Cohn had a record of trading losses, invested no more than $4,000 of his own money, and absconded with far more money for his personal expenses. The audit firm named by Cohn never agreed to audit the fund’s financial statements. Cohn continued to deceive investors after their initial investment by issuing account statements that showed annual returns of more than 200 percent for 2012 when the hedge fund actually lost money.
The SEC’s complaint charges Cohn and Market Action Advisors with violating the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws. The court granted the SEC’s request for emergency relief including a temporary restraining order and asset freeze. The SEC further seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, and financial penalties from Cohn and Market Action Advisors.
The SEC’s investigation was conducted by John J. Sikora, Jr. and Jason A. Howard, and the litigation will be led by Jonathan S. Polish.
SEC Halts Ex-Marine’s Hedge Fund Fraud Targeting Fellow Military
Washington D.C., Aug. 6, 2013
The Securities and Exchange Commission obtained an emergency court order to halt a hedge fund investment scheme by a former Marine living in the Chicago area who has been masquerading as a successful trader to defraud fellow veterans, current military, and other investors.
The SEC alleges that Clayton A. Cohn and his hedge fund management firm Market Action Advisors raised nearly $1.8 million from investors through a hedge fund he managed. Cohn lied to investors about his success as a trader, the performance of the hedge fund, his use of investor proceeds, and his personal stake in the hedge fund. Cohn only invested less than half of the money raised from investors and instead used more than $400,000 for such personal expenses as a Hollywood mansion, luxury automobile, and extravagant tabs at high-end nightclubs. He used his lavish lifestyle to carefully contrive the image of a successful trader and investor, when in reality he lost nearly all of the money invested through the hedge fund. In order to cover up his fraud and continue raising money from investors, Cohn generated phony hedge fund account statements showing annual returns exceeding 200 percent.
“Cohn lured fellow military and other investors into his hedge fund by portraying himself as a successful trader who generated massive returns for his investors,” said Timothy L. Warren, Acting Director of the Chicago Regional Office. “But Cohn’s hedge fund investors didn’t have a chance to make a profit since he never invested most of their money and promptly lost the portion he did invest.”
According to the SEC’s complaint filed in federal court in Chicago, Cohn targets mostly unsophisticated investors and has solicited friends, family members, and fellow veterans to invest in his hedge fund. Cohn controls a so-called charity called the Veterans Financial Education Network (VFEN) that purports to teach veterans how to understand and manage their money. Cohn has touted his Marine Corps pedigree in VFEN press releases and encourages veterans to find “a money-manager who is both trustworthy and knows what he is doing.” VFEN’s website identifies Cohn as a money manager who “manages millions of dollars.”
According to the SEC’s complaint, Cohn managed his hedge fund Market Action Capital Management through his investment advisory firm Market Action Advisors, which is registered with the state of Illinois. Cohn solicited investments by falsely claiming that he had major success as a personal trader and invested $1.5 million of his own money in the hedge fund. He also misrepresented that an accounting firm would audit the hedge fund’s financial statements.
The SEC alleges that Cohn had a record of trading losses, invested no more than $4,000 of his own money, and absconded with far more money for his personal expenses. The audit firm named by Cohn never agreed to audit the fund’s financial statements. Cohn continued to deceive investors after their initial investment by issuing account statements that showed annual returns of more than 200 percent for 2012 when the hedge fund actually lost money.
The SEC’s complaint charges Cohn and Market Action Advisors with violating the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws. The court granted the SEC’s request for emergency relief including a temporary restraining order and asset freeze. The SEC further seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, and financial penalties from Cohn and Market Action Advisors.
The SEC’s investigation was conducted by John J. Sikora, Jr. and Jason A. Howard, and the litigation will be led by Jonathan S. Polish.
Monday, August 12, 2013
SEC CAUTIONS EXCHANGES TO MONITOR FOR COMPLIANCE COMPOSITION OF INDICES USED IN OFFERING FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
FROM: U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
2013-150
Washington D.C., Aug. 8, 2013 —
The Securities and Exchange Commission today issued a report cautioning exchanges and investment professionals to monitor the composition of indices used in offering financial instruments to determine if they are security futures products and ensure they are complying with the federal securities laws.
The SEC’s report of investigation stems from an inquiry into a foreign derivatives exchange that was offering and selling futures to U.S. customers on what was initially a broad-based index not subject to the registration requirements of the federal securities laws. The index later transitioned to a narrow-based security index, leaving it without a valid exemption from the securities laws. The SEC’s report reminds exchanges and investment professionals to establish policies and procedures to consistently monitor the composition of indices on which futures are based to establish whether or not they are offering security futures products.
“As the compositions of exchange indices fluctuate, it is critically important for exchanges to have policies and procedures in place to effectively monitor the composition of their indices and ensure that they are appropriately offering securities based on those indices to U.S. investors,” said Daniel M. Hawke, Chief of the SEC Enforcement Division’s Market Abuse Unit. “It is equally important for investment professionals to be mindful of the highly analogous situation involving security-based swaps, and the failure to appropriately monitor the characteristics of such financial instruments risks violating the federal securities laws.”
The SEC’s investigation into Eurex Deutschland revealed that the exchange began offering and selling futures on its Euro STOXX Banks Index to U.S. customers more than 10 years ago pursuant to a Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) no-action letter obtained in part through Eurex’s representation that it was a broad-based index subject to the CFTC’s exclusive jurisdiction. In October 2011, Eurex reviewed the index for the first time in response to a request by the CFTC to confirm it was still broad-based. During the review, Eurex discovered and self-reported to the SEC and CFTC that the index had transitioned in April 2010 from a broad-based to a narrow-based security index as defined by Section 3(a)(55)(B) of the Securites Exchange Act of 1934. From April 2010 to October 2011, Eurex sold 6 million contracts on the index through approximately 79 foreign-based broker-dealers, some of which offered direct market access to the index through trading terminals in the U.S. Other orders were facilitated through omnibus customer accounts carried by foreign-based intermediaries on behalf U.S. investors.
According to the SEC’s report, Eurex did not comply with Section 6(h)(1) of the Exchange Act by effecting transactions in security futures that were not listed on a national securities exchange or national securities association for U.S. investors. Eurex also failed to comply with Section 5 of the Exchange Act by not registering as a national securities exchange, and by offering and selling security futures in the U.S without registering the transactions or having a valid exemption from registration. The Commission has decided to issue this report and forego an enforcement action against Eurex in part because of its substantial and timely cooperation with the investigation and its prompt remediation efforts. After self-reporting the findings of its review, Eurex extensively cooperated with the SEC staff and voluntarily provided updates and documents. Eurex has since implemented comprehensive policies and procedures that now require monthly, and in some instances daily, compliance monitoring of indices on which it offers futures contracts in the U.S.
The SEC’s report notes that in analogous situations involving security-based swaps, investment professionals who engage in swap transactions are responsible for ascertaining the swap’s characteristics. When the swaps are securities-based, they must ensure that they are following the registration requirements of the federal securities laws and appropriately offering these financial instruments to U.S. investors.
The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Kay B. Lee of the Enforcement Division’s Market Abuse Unit in Philadelphia, and was supervised by Mr. Hawke.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
2013-150
Washington D.C., Aug. 8, 2013 —
The Securities and Exchange Commission today issued a report cautioning exchanges and investment professionals to monitor the composition of indices used in offering financial instruments to determine if they are security futures products and ensure they are complying with the federal securities laws.
The SEC’s report of investigation stems from an inquiry into a foreign derivatives exchange that was offering and selling futures to U.S. customers on what was initially a broad-based index not subject to the registration requirements of the federal securities laws. The index later transitioned to a narrow-based security index, leaving it without a valid exemption from the securities laws. The SEC’s report reminds exchanges and investment professionals to establish policies and procedures to consistently monitor the composition of indices on which futures are based to establish whether or not they are offering security futures products.
“As the compositions of exchange indices fluctuate, it is critically important for exchanges to have policies and procedures in place to effectively monitor the composition of their indices and ensure that they are appropriately offering securities based on those indices to U.S. investors,” said Daniel M. Hawke, Chief of the SEC Enforcement Division’s Market Abuse Unit. “It is equally important for investment professionals to be mindful of the highly analogous situation involving security-based swaps, and the failure to appropriately monitor the characteristics of such financial instruments risks violating the federal securities laws.”
The SEC’s investigation into Eurex Deutschland revealed that the exchange began offering and selling futures on its Euro STOXX Banks Index to U.S. customers more than 10 years ago pursuant to a Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) no-action letter obtained in part through Eurex’s representation that it was a broad-based index subject to the CFTC’s exclusive jurisdiction. In October 2011, Eurex reviewed the index for the first time in response to a request by the CFTC to confirm it was still broad-based. During the review, Eurex discovered and self-reported to the SEC and CFTC that the index had transitioned in April 2010 from a broad-based to a narrow-based security index as defined by Section 3(a)(55)(B) of the Securites Exchange Act of 1934. From April 2010 to October 2011, Eurex sold 6 million contracts on the index through approximately 79 foreign-based broker-dealers, some of which offered direct market access to the index through trading terminals in the U.S. Other orders were facilitated through omnibus customer accounts carried by foreign-based intermediaries on behalf U.S. investors.
According to the SEC’s report, Eurex did not comply with Section 6(h)(1) of the Exchange Act by effecting transactions in security futures that were not listed on a national securities exchange or national securities association for U.S. investors. Eurex also failed to comply with Section 5 of the Exchange Act by not registering as a national securities exchange, and by offering and selling security futures in the U.S without registering the transactions or having a valid exemption from registration. The Commission has decided to issue this report and forego an enforcement action against Eurex in part because of its substantial and timely cooperation with the investigation and its prompt remediation efforts. After self-reporting the findings of its review, Eurex extensively cooperated with the SEC staff and voluntarily provided updates and documents. Eurex has since implemented comprehensive policies and procedures that now require monthly, and in some instances daily, compliance monitoring of indices on which it offers futures contracts in the U.S.
The SEC’s report notes that in analogous situations involving security-based swaps, investment professionals who engage in swap transactions are responsible for ascertaining the swap’s characteristics. When the swaps are securities-based, they must ensure that they are following the registration requirements of the federal securities laws and appropriately offering these financial instruments to U.S. investors.
The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Kay B. Lee of the Enforcement Division’s Market Abuse Unit in Philadelphia, and was supervised by Mr. Hawke.
SEC ANNOUNCES FINAL JUDGEMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT IN "U TURN" PRICING INFORMATION SCHEME
FROM: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SEC Obtains Final Judgment Against Edward O'connor
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that on July 30, 2013, the Honorable George B. Daniels of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entered a final judgment against defendant Edward O'Connor. The final judgment permanently bars O'Connor from service as an officer or director of a public company, orders him to pay disgorgement of $550,000 and a civil penalty of $150,000, and imposes permanent injunctions against future violations of the antifraud, corporate reporting, books and records, and internal accounting controls provisions of the federal securities laws cited in the Commission's complaint.
In its Complaint, as amended, the Commission alleged that O'Connor, a former director and executive officer of publicly traded commodities brokerage firm Optionable, Inc., took part in a scheme to "u turn" pricing information from defendant David Lee, a natural gas options trader at Bank of Montreal ("BMO"), back to reviewers at BMO as if the information had been independently verified. As a result of this scheme, the Commission alleged, BMO's financial results for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006 and for the first quarter of fiscal year 2007 were materially overstated. The Commission also alleged that O'Connor and another defendant made misrepresentations in Optionable's periodic reports about the firm's valuation services, among other things, and deceived the operator of the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) through misrepresentations, in a stock purchase agreement, about the truthfulness of Optionable's SEC filings and its compliance with law. O'Connor consented to the entry of the final judgment without admitting or denying the Commission's allegations.
The litigation was handled by Joe Boryshansky, Jess Velona, and Daniel Walfish.
SEC Obtains Final Judgment Against Edward O'connor
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that on July 30, 2013, the Honorable George B. Daniels of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entered a final judgment against defendant Edward O'Connor. The final judgment permanently bars O'Connor from service as an officer or director of a public company, orders him to pay disgorgement of $550,000 and a civil penalty of $150,000, and imposes permanent injunctions against future violations of the antifraud, corporate reporting, books and records, and internal accounting controls provisions of the federal securities laws cited in the Commission's complaint.
In its Complaint, as amended, the Commission alleged that O'Connor, a former director and executive officer of publicly traded commodities brokerage firm Optionable, Inc., took part in a scheme to "u turn" pricing information from defendant David Lee, a natural gas options trader at Bank of Montreal ("BMO"), back to reviewers at BMO as if the information had been independently verified. As a result of this scheme, the Commission alleged, BMO's financial results for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006 and for the first quarter of fiscal year 2007 were materially overstated. The Commission also alleged that O'Connor and another defendant made misrepresentations in Optionable's periodic reports about the firm's valuation services, among other things, and deceived the operator of the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) through misrepresentations, in a stock purchase agreement, about the truthfulness of Optionable's SEC filings and its compliance with law. O'Connor consented to the entry of the final judgment without admitting or denying the Commission's allegations.
The litigation was handled by Joe Boryshansky, Jess Velona, and Daniel Walfish.
Sunday, August 11, 2013
TWO FORMER OFFICERS OF DEFUNCT COMPANY CHARGED FOR PARTICIPATING IN FRAUDULENT PENNY STOCK SCHEME
FROM: U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SEC Charges Former Officers and Investor in Houston Company in Fraudulent Penny Stock Scheme
The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged two former officers of now-defunct PGI Energy, Inc., as well as an investor in the company, for their roles in a fraudulent penny stock scheme to issue purportedly unrestricted PGI Energy shares in the public markets.
The SEC's complaint, filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, alleges that starting in 2011, PGI Energy's former Chief Investment Officer Robert Gandy and former CEO and Chairman Marcellous McZeal engaged in a scheme that included creating false promissory notes, signing misleading certifications, and altering the company's balance sheet to cause its transfer agent to issue millions of PGI Energy common stock shares without restrictive legends. The SEC also charged investor Alvin Ausbon for his role in the scheme, which included signing false promissory notes and diverting proceeds from the sale of PGI Energy stock back to the company and Gandy.
Gandy is also the CEO of Houston-based Pythagoras Group, which purports to be an "investment banking firm." McZeal is an attorney licensed in Texas. The complaint alleges that Gandy and McZeal made material misstatements and provided false documents to attorneys and a transfer agent who relied on them to conclude that PGI Energy shares could be issued without restrictive legends. The SEC alleges that Gandy and McZeal backdated promissory notes that purported to memorialize debt supposedly owed by PGI Energy and a prior business venture. They also are alleged to have added false debt to PGI Energy's balance sheet, and signed bogus "gift" letters and certifications of non-shell status, all in an effort to get unrestricted, free-trading PGI Energy shares unlawfully released into the market. Ausbon is charged with furthering the scheme by signing bogus promissory notes and remitting proceeds from the sale of PGI Energy shares back to the company and Gandy.
According to the complaint, the scheme collapsed in February 2012 when the SEC ordered a temporary suspension of trading in PGI Energy's securities, due to questions regarding the accuracy and adequacy of the company's representations in press releases and other public statements.
The SEC's complaint charges all defendants with violating Sections 5 and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The complaint seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement plus prejudgment interest, a financial penalty, and penny stock bars against all three defendants and officer and director bars against Gandy and McZeal.
Without admitting or denying the allegations in the SEC's complaint, McZeal has consented to the entry of a final judgment enjoining him from future violations of Sections 5 and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. He has also agreed to pay disgorgement plus prejudgment interest thereon of $19,919.37 and a civil penalty of $70,000. In addition, McZeal has agreed to permanent officer and director and penny stock bars. This settlement is subject to court approval. Subject to final settlement of the district court proceeding, McZeal has also agreed to the institution of a settled administrative proceeding pursuant to Rule 102(e) of the SEC's Rules of Practice, pursuant to which he would be barred from appearing before the SEC as an attorney.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Subscribe To WALL STREET FRAUDSTERS
Posts
All Comments