Search This Blog


This is a photo of the National Register of Historic Places listing with reference number 7000063

Sunday, June 15, 2014

SEC CHARGES TIPPER IN FRIENDS INSIDER TRADING CASE

FROM:  U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
SEC Charges Tipper in Insider Trading Ring Involving High School Friends

The Securities and Exchange Commission today filed an enforcement action against Michael J. Baron for participating in an insider trading ring that involved a group of high school friends and others trading in the securities of health care companies. The SEC previously charged seven others involved.

The SEC's complaint alleges that Baron, a former senior editor at a financial publication, received material nonpublic information from his high school friend John Lazorchak, a Celgene Corporation insider, about Celgene's acquisition of Pharmion Corp., which was publicly announced on November 19, 2007. The SEC further alleges that Baron received material nonpublic information from a second high school friend Mark D. Foldy, an insider at Stryker Corporation, about Stryker Corp.'s tender offer to acquire Orthovita, Inc., which was publicly announced on May 16, 2011. In each instance, Baron illegally tipped the information to a relative, who traded on the basis of the tipped information.

The complaint charges Baron with violating Sections 10(b) and 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5 and 14e-3 thereunder. The SEC is seeking a final judgment ordering Baron to disgorge the ill-gotten gains of his tippee plus prejudgment interest, and to pay a civil penalty. Subject to approval by the court, Baron has agreed to settle the action by consenting to a final judgment enjoining him from an injunction against future violations and ordering him to pay disgorgement of $6,825 plus prejudgment interest and a penalty of $3,400.

The SEC's investigation was conducted by David W. Snyder and John S. Rymas and supervised by Kelly L. Gibson, who are members of the Market Abuse Unit in the Philadelphia Regional Office. Catherine E. Pappas is the trial counsel on the litigation.

Friday, June 13, 2014

GUILTY PLEA COMES IN YEN LIBOR MANIPULATION CASE

FROM:  U.S. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT 
FORMER RABOBANK TRADER PLEADS GUILTY
FOR SCHEME TO MANIPULATE YEN LIBOR

WASHINGTON — A former Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. (Rabobank) Japanese Yen derivatives trader pleaded guilty today for his role in a conspiracy to commit wire and bank fraud by manipulating Rabobank’s Yen London InterBank Offered Rate (LIBOR) submissions to benefit his trading positions.

Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Assistant Attorney General Leslie R. Caldwell of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brent Snyder of the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division and Assistant Director in Charge Valerie Parlave of the FBI’s Washington Field Office made the announcement.

Today, a criminal information was filed in the Southern District of New York charging Takayuki Yagami, a Japanese national, with one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and bank fraud.  Yagami pleaded guilty to the information before United States District Judge Jed S. Rakoff in the Southern District of New York.

“With this guilty plea, we take another significant step to hold accountable those who fraudulently manipulated the world’s cornerstone benchmark interest rate for financial gain,” said Attorney General Eric Holder.  “This conduct distorted transactions and financial products around the world.  Manipulating LIBOR effectively rigs the global financial system, compromising the fairness of world markets.  This plea demonstrates that the Justice Department will never waver, and we will never rest, in our determination to ensure the integrity of the marketplace and protect it from fraud.”

“Today, a former Rabobank trader has pleaded guilty to participating in a scheme to manipulate the global benchmark interest rate LIBOR to benefit Rabobank’s trading positions,” said Assistant Attorney General Caldwell.  “This was the ultimate inside job.  As alleged, traders illegally influenced the very interest rate on which their trades were based, using fraud to gain an unfair advantage.  Takayuki Yagami is the ninth person charged by the Justice Department in connection with the industry-wide LIBOR investigation, and we are determined to pursue other individuals and institutions who engaged in this crime.”

“Today’s guilty plea is a significant step forward in the LIBOR investigation and demonstrates the Department’s firm commitment to individual accountability,” said Deputy Assistant Attorney General Snyder.  “We will continue to pursue aggressively other individuals involved in this or other illegal schemes that undermine free and fair financial markets.”

“Manipulating financial trading markets to create an unfair advantage is against the law,” said Assistant Director in Charge Parlave.  “Today’s guilty plea further underscores the FBI’s ability to investigate complex international financial crimes and bring the perpetrators to justice.  The Washington Field Office has committed significant time and resources including the expertise of Special Agents, forensic accountants and analysts to investigate this case along with our Department of Justice colleagues.  Their efforts send a clear message to anyone contemplating financial crimes: think twice or you will face the consequences.”

According to court documents, LIBOR is an average interest rate, calculated based on submissions from leading banks around the world, reflecting the rates those banks believe they would be charged if borrowing from other banks.  LIBOR serves as the primary benchmark for short-term interest rates globally and is used as a reference rate for many interest rate contracts, mortgages, credit cards, student loans and other consumer lending products.  The Bank of International Settlements estimated that as of the second half of 2009, outstanding interest rate contracts were valued at approximately $450 trillion.

At the time relevant to the charges, LIBOR was published by the British Bankers’ Association (BBA), a trade association based in London.  LIBOR was calculated for 10 currencies at 15 borrowing periods, known as maturities, ranging from overnight to one year.  The published LIBOR “fix” for Yen LIBOR at a specific maturity is the result of a calculation based upon submissions from a panel of 16 banks, including Rabobank.

Yagami admitted to conspiring with Paul Robson, of the United Kingdom, Paul Thompson, of Australia, and Tetsuya Motomura, of Japan.  Robson, Thompson and Motomura were charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and bank fraud as well as substantive counts of wire fraud in a fifteen-count indictment returned by a federal grand jury in the Southern District of New York on April 28, 2014.  All four are former employees of Rabobank.

Rabobank entered into a deferred prosecution agreement with the Department of Justice on Oct. 29, 2013 and agreed to pay a $325 million penalty to resolve violations arising from Rabobank’s LIBOR submissions.

According to allegations in the information and indictment, the four defendants traded in derivative products that referenced Yen LIBOR.  Robson worked as a senior trader at Rabobank’s Money Markets and Short Term Forwards desk in London; Thompson was Rabobank’s head of Money Market and Derivatives Trading Northeast Asia and worked in Singapore; Motomura was a senior trader at Rabobank’s Tokyo desk who supervised money market and derivative traders; and Yagami worked as a senior trader at Rabobank’s Money Market/FX Forwards desks in Tokyo and elsewhere in Asia.  In addition to trading derivative products that referenced Yen LIBOR, Robson also served as Rabobank’s primary submitter of Yen LIBOR to the BBA.

Robson, Thompson, Motomura and Yagami each entered into derivatives contracts containing Yen LIBOR as a price component.  The profit and loss that flowed from those contracts was directly affected by the relevant Yen LIBOR on certain dates.  If the relevant Yen LIBOR moved in the direction favorable to the defendants’ positions, Rabobank and the defendants benefitted at the expense of the counterparties.  When LIBOR moved in the opposite direction, the defendants and Rabobank stood to lose money to their counterparties.

As alleged in court filings, from about May 2006 to at least January 2011, the four defendants and others agreed to make false and fraudulent Yen LIBOR submissions for the benefit of their trading positions.  According to the allegations, sometimes Robson submitted rates at a specific level requested by a co-defendant, including Yagami, and consistent with the co-defendant’s trading positions.  Other times, Robson made a higher or lower Yen LIBOR submission consistent with the direction requested by a co-defendant and consistent with the co-defendant’s trading positions.  On those occasions, Robson’s manipulated Yen LIBOR submissions were to the detriment of, among others, Rabobank’s counterparties to derivative contracts.  Thompson, Motomura and Yagami (described in the indictment as Trader-R) made requests of Robson for Yen LIBOR submissions through electronic chats and email exchanges.  

For example, according to court filings, on Sept. 21, 2007, Yagami asked Robson by email, “wehre do you think today’s libors are?  If you can I would like 1mth higher today.”  Robson responded, “bookies reckon .85,” to which Yagami replied, “I have some fixings in 1mth so would appreciate if you can put it higher mate.”  Robson answered, “no prob mate let me know your level.”  After Yagami asked for “0.90% for 1mth,” Robson confirmed, “sure no prob[ ] I’ll probably get a few phone calls but no worries mate… there’s bigger crooks in the market than us guys!”

The indictment alleges that Robson accommodated the requests of his co-defendants.  For example, on Sept. 21, 2007, after Robson allegedly received a request from Yagami for a high 1-month Yen LIBOR, Rabobank submitted a 1-month Yen LIBOR rate of 0.90, which was 7 basis points higher than the previous day and 5 basis points above where Robson said that “bookies” predicted it, and which moved Rabobank’s submission from the middle to the highest of the panel.

According to court documents, the defendants were also aware that they were making false or fraudulent Yen LIBOR submissions.  For example, on May 10, 2006, Robson admitted in an email to Yagami that “it must be pretty embarrasing to set such a low libor.  I was very embarrased to set my 6 mth – but wanted to help thomo [Thompson].  Tomorrow it will be more like 33 from me.”  At times, Robson referred to the submissions that he submitted on behalf of his co-defendants as “ridiculously high” and “obscenely high,” and acknowledged that his submissions would be so out of line with the other Yen LIBOR panel banks that he might receive a phone call about them from the BBA or Thomson Reuters.

The charges in the indictment are merely accusations, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

The investigation is being conducted by special agents, forensic accountants, and intelligence analysts in the FBI’s Washington Field Office.  The prosecution is being handled by Senior Litigation Counsel Carol L. Sipperly and Trial Attorney Brian R. Young of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section, and Trial Attorney Michael T. Koenig of the Antitrust Division.  The Criminal Division’s Office of International Affairs has provided assistance in this matter.

The Justice Department expresses its appreciation for the assistance provided by various enforcement agencies in the United States and abroad.  The Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s Division of Enforcement referred this matter to the department and, along with the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority, has played a major role in the LIBOR investigation.  The Securities and Exchange Commission also has played a significant role in the LIBOR series of investigations, and the department expresses its appreciation to the United Kingdom’s Serious Fraud Office for its assistance and ongoing cooperation.   The department has worked closely with the Dutch Public Prosecution Service and the Dutch Central Bank in the investigation of Rabobank.  Various agencies and enforcement authorities from other nations are also participating in different aspects of the broader investigation relating to LIBOR and other benchmark rates, and the department is grateful for their cooperation and assistance.

This prosecution is part of efforts underway by President Barack Obama’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force.  President Obama established the interagency Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force to wage an aggressive, coordinated and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes.  The task force includes representatives from a broad range of federal agencies, regulatory authorities, inspectors general and state and local law enforcement who, working together, bring to bear a powerful array of criminal and civil enforcement resources.  The task force is working to improve efforts across the federal executive branch, and with state and local partners, to investigate and prosecute significant financial crimes, ensure just and effective punishment for those who perpetrate financial crimes, combat discrimination in the lending and financial markets and recover proceeds for victims of financial crimes.

Monday, June 9, 2014

SEC AWARDS $875,000 IN WHISTLEBLOWER MONEY TO BE SPLIT BETWEEN TWO TIPSTERS

FROM:  U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE  COMMISSION 

The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced a whistleblower award of more than $875,000 to be split evenly between two individuals who provided tips and assistance to help the agency bring an enforcement action.

The SEC’s whistleblower program authorized by the Dodd-Frank Act rewards high-quality, original information that results in an SEC enforcement action with sanctions exceeding $1 million.  Whistleblower awards can range from 10 percent to 30 percent of the money collected in a case.

By law, the SEC must protect the confidentiality of whistleblowers and cannot disclose any information that might directly or indirectly reveal a whistleblower’s identity.

“These whistleblowers provided original information and assistance that enabled us to investigate and bring a successful enforcement action in a complex area of the securities market,” said Sean McKessy, chief of the SEC’s Office of the Whistleblower.  “Whistleblowers who report their concerns to the SEC perform a great service to investors and help us combat fraud.”

A total of eight whistleblowers have been awarded through the SEC’s whistleblower program since it began in late 2011.

Sunday, June 8, 2014

SEC CHARGES WEB-BUSH SECURITIES INC., WITH VIOLATING AGENCY'S MARKET ACCESS RULE

FROM:  U.S. SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced charges against a Los Angeles-based market access provider and two officials accused of violating the agency’s market access rule that requires firms to have adequate risk controls in place before providing customers with access to the market.

The SEC’s Enforcement Division alleges that Wedbush Securities Inc., which has consistently ranked as one of the five largest firms by trading volume on NASDAQ, failed to maintain direct and exclusive control over settings in trading platforms used by its customers to send orders to the markets.  Wedbush did not have the required pre-trade controls, failed to restrict trading access to people whom the firm preapproved and authorized, and did not conduct an adequate annual review of its market access risk management controls.  The Enforcement Division alleges that the firm’s violations of the market access rule were caused by Jeffrey Bell, the former executive vice president in charge of Wedbush’s market access business, and Christina Fillhart, a senior vice president in the market access division.

“Wedbush provided market access to overseas traders without preapproval and without ensuring that they complied with U.S. law,” said Andrew J. Ceresney, director of the SEC Enforcement Division.  “We will hold Wedbush accountable for reaping substantial profits while failing to protect U.S. markets from the risks posed by these traders.”

Daniel M. Hawke, chief of the SEC Enforcement Division’s Market Abuse Unit, added, “The market access rule was adopted out of concerns that some broker-dealers did not have effective controls in place for their market access.  This enforcement action against Wedbush is a cornerstone of our ongoing efforts to hold accountable any broker-dealers who fail to effectively implement market access controls and procedures.”

According to the SEC’s order instituting administrative proceedings, the violations began in July 2011 and continued into 2013.  Wedbush allowed the majority of its market access customers to send orders directly to U.S. trading venues by using trading platforms over which Wedbush did not have direct and exclusive control.  Bell was aware of the requirements of the market access rule and should have known that the firm’s risk management controls and supervisory procedures related to market access did not comply with the market access rule.  Fillhart also had responsibility for overseeing Wedbush’s market access business and received inquiries by exchanges about potential violations by Wedbush and its customers.  Despite these red flags, Fillhart did not take adequate steps to prompt the firm to adopt reasonably designed risk management controls.

According to the SEC’s order, in addition to violating the market access rule (Securities Exchange Act Rule 15c3-5), Wedbush violated other regulatory requirements as a result of trading by its market access customers.  These violations include Rule 203(b)(1) of Regulation SHO relating to short sales, Rule 611(c) of Regulation NMS related to intermarket sweep orders, Rule 17a-8 concerning anti-money laundering requirements, and Rule 17a-4(b)(4) concerning the preservation of records.

The proceeding before an administrative law judge will determine whether Wedbush willfully violated these provisions of the federal securities laws, and whether Bell and Fillhart were causes of the firm’s violations of the market access rule.  The judge also will decide what sanctions, if any, are appropriate.

The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Steven Buchholz of the Market Abuse Unit and San Francisco Regional Office as well as Jina Choi, who formerly worked in the Market Abuse Unit and is now director of the San Francisco office.  The case was supervised by Mr. Hawke and Robert Cohen, co-deputy chief of the Market Abuse Unit.  The Enforcement Division’s litigation will be led by Lloyd Farnham and John Yun of the San Francisco office.  The SEC appreciates the assistance of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

Remarks at SEC Historical Society 2014 Annual Meeting: On the 80th Anniversary of the SEC

Remarks at SEC Historical Society 2014 Annual Meeting: On the 80th Anniversary of the SEC

SEC CHARGES MAN FOR AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUDULENT FOREX TRADING SCHEME

FROM:  U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
SEC Charges Accomplice in Forex Trading Scheme

The Securities and Exchange Commission  filed charges against Steven M. McCraw for aiding and abetting a fraudulent foreign currency exchange (“forex”) trading scheme. The SEC’s case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

The SEC alleges that McCraw knowingly or recklessly provided substantial assistance to Kevin G. White and his company, KGW Capital Management, LLC, in perpetrating a fraudulent scheme that raised approximately $7.4 million between September 2011 and July 2013. The SEC’s complaint alleges that White and KGW Capital raised investor funds through Revelation Forex, a purportedly successful “highly specialized hedge fund” that claimed to employ a sophisticated, low-risk, high-return forex trading strategy. McCraw helped White attract potential investors to Revelation Forex by calculating alleged trading returns that were used in various marketing materials and on Revelation Forex’s website. McCraw also took the lead in creating an ostensibly “independent” website that ranked Revelation Forex as one of the best performing forex funds in the world. McCraw also met with potential investors and solicited investments for Revelation Forex.

According to the SEC, Revelation Forex’s actual trading did not generate the positive returns that were represented to investors, but instead lost more than $2 million. Moreover, White used investor funds for various personal expenses and to fund other unrelated and undisclosed investments and businesses, including a propane gas company operated by McCraw. The SEC previously halted White’s fraudulent scheme in SEC v. Kevin G. White, et al., Civil Action No. 4:13-cv-0383 (E.D. Tex. July 9, 2013).

McCraw is charged with violating or aiding and abetting violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. He has agreed to settle the SEC’s charges by consenting to injunctions against future violations of these provisions, injunctions against engaging in certain specific conduct, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains (with prejudgment interest), and civil penalties to be determined by the district court.