This is a look at Wall Street fraudsters via excerpts from various U.S. government web sites such as the SEC, FDIC, DOJ, FBI and CFTC.
Search This Blog
Monday, February 9, 2015
SEC IMPOSES SANCTIONS AGAINST 4 CHINA-BASED ACCOUNTING FIRMS RELATING TO NON-COOPERATION IN FRAUD INVESTIGATIONS
FROM: U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
02/05/2015
The Securities and Exchange Commission imposed sanctions against four China-based accounting firms that had refused to turn over documents related to investigations of potential fraud. The China-based firms are members of large international networks associated with the “Big Four” accounting firms and registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB).
As part of the settlement, the Commission censures the firms, which eventually began providing the documents, and requires them to perform specific steps to satisfy SEC requests for similar materials over the next four years. Under the settlement, the firms each agreed to pay $500,000 and admit that they did not produce documents before the proceedings were instituted against them in 2012. They agreed to the settlement without admitting or denying other findings in the order.
“As we repeatedly have stated throughout this litigation, obtaining an audit firm’s workpapers is critical to enforcement staff’s ability adequately to protect investors from the dangers of accounting fraud,” said Andrew Ceresney, Director of the SEC’s Enforcement Division. “This settlement recognizes the SEC’s substantial recent progress in obtaining those documents from registered firms in China. The settlement also holds four of the firms accountable for previously violating U.S. rules, and makes clear that should production of documents cease, the SEC can restart the administrative proceeding.”
In January 2014, after a 12-day hearing the previous summer, an administrative law judge issued an initial decision finding that the four firms – Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants Limited, Ernst & Young Hua Ming LLP, KPMG Huazhen (Special General Partnership), and PricewaterhouseCoopers Zhong Tian CPAs Limited Company – willfully refused to provide the SEC with workpapers and related documents in connection with their audit work for nine China-based companies that had securities registered in the U.S. The initial decision found that the firms willfully violated Section 106 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires foreign public accounting firms to provide such workpapers to the SEC upon request.
After the hearing, the SEC received multiple productions of workpapers from the firms through assistance provided by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC). As these productions were being made, the four firms petitioned the Commission to review the January 2014 initial decision. The SEC’s Enforcement Division also sought review of aspects of that decision.
“The settlement is an important milestone in the SEC’s ability to obtain documents from China. Of course, we hope that it is an enduring milestone,” said Antonia Chion, Associate Director of the Enforcement Division. “The settlement provides a path forward for obtaining productions and enhanced future cooperation from the Big Four firms.”
Under the settlement, if future document productions fail to meet specified criteria, the Commission retains authority to impose a variety of additional remedial measures on the firms depending on the nature of the failure. Remedies for any future noncompliance could include, as appropriate, an automatic six-month bar on a single firm’s performance of certain audit work, commencement of a new proceeding against a firm, or the resumption of the current proceeding against all four firms.
The proceeding continues against a fifth China-based accounting firm, Dahua CPA Ltd.
The Enforcement Division’s litigation has been led by David Mendel and assisted by Jan Folena, Amy Friedman, Marc E. Johnson, and Douglas Gordimer. The litigation has been supervised by Matthew Solomon, Antonia Chion, and Kara Brockmeyer.
Sunday, February 8, 2015
SEC CHARGES MAN WITH TRADING BASED ON NONPUBLIC INFORMATION
FROM: U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 23187 / February 3, 2015
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Joel J. Epstein, Civil Action No. 15-cv-0506
SEC Charges Pennsylvania Man with Insider Trading
The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged Joel J. Epstein of Huntingdon Valley, Pennsylvania with insider trading based on material nonpublic information that Epstein misappropriated from his son regarding Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company's merger with Harleysville Group, Inc. On the morning of September 29, 2011, Nationwide and Harleysville, a Pennsylvania-based insurance provider, announced that Nationwide would acquire all publicly-traded shares of Harleysville for $60 per share. At the end of trading on September 29, Harleysville's stock price closed at $58.96, approximately 87% higher than the previous day's close. Epstein has agreed to settle the matter. The settlement is pending final approval by the court.
According to the SEC's complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Epstein's son learned about the impending Harleysville merger from his long-time girlfriend who was a legal assistant at a law firm that was advising Harleysville on the transaction. On or before September 2, 2011, Epstein's son told him the information he learned from his girlfriend. The complaint further alleges that, between September 2 and September 28, 2011, in breach of a duty of trust and confidence owed to his son, Epstein misappropriated the information that he received from his son and purchased 4,000 shares of Harleysville stock. Epstein sold the shares after the public announcement of the acquisition, realizing ill-gotten gains of $113,503.
The SEC's complaint also alleges that Epstein tipped four people who each purchased 1,000 shares of Harleysville stock between September 21 and September 26, 2011. All four tippees sold their shares on the day of the public announcement, realizing total ill-gotten gains of $123,511.
Epstein has consented to the entry of a final judgment permanently enjoining him from violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder; and requiring him to pay disgorgement of $237,014, the amount of his and his tippees' ill-gotten gains, plus prejudgment interest of $21,599, and a civil penalty of $237,014.
The SEC's investigation, which is continuing, has been conducted by Kelly L. Gibson, Assunta Vivolo and John Rymas of the SEC's Market Abuse Unit along with John V. Donnelly of the Philadelphia Regional Office. The case has been supervised by Daniel M. Hawke, Chief of the Market Abuse Unit, and G. Jeffrey Boujoukos. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).
Saturday, February 7, 2015
CFTC CHARGED HUSBAND, WIFE AND COMPANIES WITH FRAUD
FROM: U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
February 3, 2015
CFTC Charges California Residents Christopher Valois and Cynthia Wong and Their Companies with Fraud and Registration Violations
Husband and wife team allegedly stole more than $300,000 of the $750,000 their customers invested
Federal court enters emergency Order freezing Defendants’ assets and protecting books and records
Washington, DC – The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) today announced that Judge Cormac J. Carney of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California entered an emergency restraining Order freezing assets and prohibiting the destruction or concealment of books and records of Defendants Christopher Valois, Cynthia Wong, and their companies, Bertram Trade LLC (Bertram) and Churchhill Commodities Trading LLC (Churchhill), all of Orange County California. The judge set a hearing date for February 12, 2015.
The court’s Order arises from a CFTC Complaint filed on January 28, 2015, charging the Defendants with precious metals and futures fraud, misappropriation, engaging in illegal off-exchange precious metals transactions, and registration violations, in violation of the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC Regulations from October 2011 to the present.
According to the Complaint, husband and wife Valois and Wong, acting by and through Bertram and Churchhill, fraudulently solicited approximately $450,000 from six customers, some of whom were senior citizens, to purchase precious metals or engage in futures trading. The Complaint states that the precious metals transactions offered by Valois and Wong and their companies were illegal off-exchange instruments and alleges that Valois and Wong misappropriated more than $300,000 of customer money to pay their personal expenses.
The Complaint also alleges that Valois and Wong acted as Commodity Trading Advisors by trading another $300,000 of at least four members of the general public in futures contracts and receiving advisory fees for such futures trading, even though they were not registered with the CFTC, as required. In fact, Valois previously had been banned from the futures industry for cheating and defrauding customers, according to the Complaint.
In its continuing litigation, the CFTC seeks restitution, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, civil monetary penalties, trading and registration bans, and a permanent injunction against further violations of federal commodities laws, as charged.
The CFTC appreciates the cooperation of the National Futures Association in this matter.
CFTC Division of Enforcement staff members responsible for this case are Camille Arnold, Joseph Patrick, Robert Howell, Scott Williamson, and Rosemary Hollinger.
Friday, February 6, 2015
Thursday, February 5, 2015
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)