CFTC CHARGES MAN AND BUSINESS WITH OPERATION OF ILLEGAL PRECIOUS METALS SCHEME

FROM:  U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

CFTC Charges Florida-Based Southern Trust Metals, Inc. and Robert Escobio, and His BVI-Based Entity Loreley Overseas Corp., with Operating an Illegal Precious Metals Scheme, among other Violations

Defendants Solicited over $3.5 Million from Customers in the Precious Metals Scheme and in a Separate Unlawful Commodity Futures and Options Scheme

Washington, DC – The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) filed a civil enforcement Complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida against Defendants Southern Trust Metals, Inc. (ST Metals) and Robert Escobio, both of Coral Gables, Florida, and Loreley Overseas Corp. (Loreley), a British Virgin Island entity that Escobio incorporated in 2004. The CFTC Complaint charges that, from at least July 16, 2011 to May 1, 2013, the Defendants operated a scheme that defrauded retail customers in connection with illegal, off-exchange, financed precious metals transactions. In operating the precious metals scheme, the Defendants received more than $2.6 million from at least 135 customers, who collectively lost $600,000 of the funds invested with ST Metals, according to the Complaint.

In a separate unlawful scheme, the Defendants, between February 2011 and May 2013, solicited and accepted more than $900,000 from customers for the purchase or sale of commodity futures and options, without registering with the CFTC as a Futures Commission Merchant, according to the Complaint.

ST Metals solicited retail customers to engage in off-exchange leveraged, margined, or financed precious metals transactions. Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank Act), these transactions are illegal unless they result in actual delivery of metal within 28 days. The Complaint alleges that metals were never actually delivered in connection with these precious metals transactions. Instead, the Complaint alleges, ST Metals engaged in a series of transactions that ended with over-the-counter derivative trades in margin trading accounts in the name of Loreley with two U.K.-based trading firms. Additionally, according to the Complaint, ST Metals told customers that it was making loans to purchase precious metals in connection with these transactions, but in fact, no loans were made, no metals were purchased, and the transactions were illegal commodity transactions under the Dodd-Frank Act.

In its continuing litigation against ST Metals, Loreley, and Escobio, the CFTC seeks disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, restitution for the benefit of customers, civil monetary penalties, permanent registration and trading bans, and a permanent injunction from future violations of the Commodity Exchange Act, as charged.

The CFTC thanks the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority for its assistance in this matter.

CFTC Division of Enforcement staff members responsible for this action are Carlin Metzger, Heather Johnson, Joseph Konizeski, Scott Williamson, and Rosemary Hollinger.

GEORGIA MINISTER CHARGED WITH FRAUD BY SEC

FROM:  U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

SEC Charges a Self-Proclaimed Ordained Minister in Georgia and His Company with a Fraudulent Offering of Securities.

The Securities and Exchange Commission filed fraud charges and sought emergency relief on July 31, 2014, against Thomas J. Lawler, a resident of Snellville, Georgia and a self-proclaimed minister, and his company, Freedom Foundation USA LLC for fraudulently offering and selling fictitious securities.  

The SEC's complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia alleges that, since as early as 2004, the defendants  Lawler and Freedom Foundation have offered investors the opportunity to eliminate their debts and collect lucrative profits through the purchase of so called “administrative remedies” (“ARs”).  Defendants have told potential investors, according to the complaint, that every individual had funds established for them in an account at birth -- where, by whom, and in what amount the supposed account is established are details Lawler does not provide.  Defendants further told potential investors that the investors therefore did not owe their creditors for mortgage and other debts, and that Freedom Foundation would use its unique and proprietary process to create the ARs, which would eliminate the investors’ debt and provide a lucrative financial return.  The complaint alleges that defendants told potential investors that a $1,000 AR would cancel the investor’s debt and return $325,000 to the investor, while a $10,000 investment would supposedly entitle the investor to receive $1 million when the AR funded.  According to the complaint, Freedom Foundation claimed it would fund the ARs through a mysterious process involving a Papal decree.

The complaint alleges that Lawler has sold approximately 2,000 ARs over ten years to investors throughout the country and that he is actively soliciting additional investors.  Although the defendants continue to tell investors that funding of the ARs is “imminent,” the complaint alleges that not one investor in this scheme has received any of the promised returns. 

In response to the SEC's request for emergency relief, U.S. District Court Judge Amy Totenberg issued a temporary restraining order and imposed an asset freeze to preserve assets, among other things.  A hearing on the SEC's motion for a preliminary injunction has been scheduled for Friday, August 8th.   

The complaint alleges that defendants violated the registration and antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws, Sections 5(a), (c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. 

The SEC's investigation and litigation have been conducted by Gregory F. Smolar, Karaz S. Zaki, Pat Huddleston, M. Graham Loomis and William P. Hicks of the Atlanta Regional Office.   The SEC acknowledges the assistance from the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Georgia. 

INVESTMENT ADVISER RECEIVES 21 YEAR PRISON SENTENCES FOR DEFRAUDING CLIENTS

FROM:  U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Pennsylvania-Based Investment Adviser Charged in SEC and Criminal Actions Receives Prison Sentence

A Pennsylvania-based investment adviser who was charged with fraud in an SEC enforcement action and later by criminal authorities has received a prison sentence of more than 21 years.

Robert G. Bard of Warfordsburg, Pa., was sentenced on July 31 by Sylvia H. Rambo of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. Bard had been found guilty by a jury and convicted of 21 counts of securities fraud, mail fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud, and making false statements for defrauding his investment advisory clients between December 2004 and August 2009. Judge Rambo sentenced Bard to 262 months imprisonment and ordered him to pay $4.2 million in restitution to 66 victims.

The criminal case, filed by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Middle District of Pennsylvania on July 18, 2012, arose out of the same facts that were the subject of a civil injunctive action filed by the SEC on July 30, 2009. The Commission's complaint alleged that defendant Bard, an investment adviser, and his solely-owned company Vision Specialist Group LLC had violated the federal securities laws through fraudulent misrepresentations regarding client investments, account performance and advisory fees, and by Bard's creation of false client account statements, and forgery of client documents. On May 23, 2012, after granting summary judgment for the Commission, the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania entered a final judgment against Bard and Vision Specialist Group finding both violated § 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, § 10(b) of the Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and §§ 206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. In that judgment, the court also entered permanent injunctions for violations of those provisions, and held Bard and Vision Specialist Group jointly and severally liable for disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil penalties totaling $3,003,039.

SEC CHARGES BROKER WITH DEFRAUDING THE ELDERLY AND BLIND

FROM:  THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

The Securities and Exchange Commission charged a broker based in Roanoke, Va., with defrauding elderly customers, including some who are legally blind, by stealing their funds for her personal use and falsifying their account statements to cover up her fraud.

According to the SEC’s complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia, Donna Jessee Tucker siphoned $730,289 from elderly customers and used the money to pay for such personal expenses as vacations, vehicles, clothes, and country club membership.  Tucker ensured that the customers received their monthly account statements electronically, knowing that they were unable or unwilling to access their statements in that format.  The SEC further alleges that Tucker engaged in unauthorized trading and other financial transactions while making misrepresentations to customers about their investment accounts and forging brokerage, banking, and other documents. 

The SEC’s investigation resulted from a broker-dealer examination of the firm where Tucker worked that was conducted by the SEC’s Philadelphia Regional Office.

“Tucker befriended her customers and gained their trust, only to be stealing their money behind their backs and giving them phony documents to hide it,” said Sharon Binger, director of the SEC’s Philadelphia office.

In a parallel action, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Virginia announced criminal charges against Tucker.

Tucker has agreed to settle the SEC’s charges and disgorge the $730,289 in ill-gotten gains either in the criminal case or the civil case.  She consented to the entry of an order permanently enjoining her from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 as well as Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5.  The settlement is subject to court approval.

The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Brendan P. McGlynn, Lisa M. Candera, and Daniel L. Koster of the Philadelphia Regional Office, with assistance from Christopher R. Kelly.  The examination that led to the investigation was conducted by James A. O’Leary, Calvin N. Inge, and William McIntyre under the supervision of Diane J. Hagy.

The SEC appreciates the assistance of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Virginia, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Secret Service, and Internal Revenue Service.

SCE ANNOUNCES FRAUD CHARGES AGAINST CEO OF RENEWABLE ENERGY PENNY STOCK COMPANY

FROM:  U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced fraud charges against a penny stock company and its CEO linked to a scam artist whom the agency separately charged earlier this month.

The SEC alleges that MSGI Technology Solutions and its CEO J. Jeremy Barbera defrauded investors by touting a joint venture to develop and manage solar energy farms across the country on land purportedly owned by an electricity provider operated by Christopher Plummer.  Barbera and Plummer co-authored press releases falsely portraying MSGI as a successful renewable energy company on the brink of profitable solar energy projects.  However, MSGI had no operations, customers, or revenue at the time, and Plummer’s company did not actually possess any of the assets or financing needed to develop the purported solar energy farms. 

The SEC previously charged Plummer and a different penny stock company and CEO that similarly issued false press releases depicting a thriving business that in reality was struggling financially.

Barbera and MSGI agreed to settle the SEC’s charges.

“It is vital that information disseminated by a company into the marketplace be corroborated and truthful,” said Sanjay Wadhwa, senior associate director of the SEC’s New York Regional Office.  “Barbera caused MSGI to issue press releases baselessly touting nonexistent assets and phony business opportunities, which had the harmful effect of misleading investors.”

According to the SEC’s complaint filed in federal court in Manhattan, in addition to co-authoring misleading press releases with Plummer, Barbera himself made other material misstatements about MSGI’s operations.  For example, he described MSGI in press releases and on its website as an operational security company with customers all over the world, despite the fact that MSGI had long lacked the financial means to manufacture any security products on a commercial scale.  Barbera also falsely claimed in press releases that another sham entity operated by Plummer had purchased MSGI’s sizable outstanding debt, and he falsely touted nonexistent solar energy projects with an entity unrelated to Plummer.

The SEC’s complaint charges Barbera and MSGI with violating antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws.  The defendants have consented to the entry of final judgments permanently enjoining them from future violations of the antifraud provisions.  Barbera has agreed to pay a $100,000 penalty and be permanently barred from acting as an officer or director of a public company or from participating in a penny stock offering.  Barbera and MSGI neither admitted nor denied the charges.  The settlement is subject to court approval.

The SEC’s investigation has been conducted by Justin P. Smith and George N. Stepaniuk of the New York office and supervised by Sanjay Wadhwa.  The SEC appreciates the assistance of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Connecticut and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

GUN MAKER CHARGED BY SEC WITH BRIBING FOREIGN OFFICIALS

FROM:  U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation with violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) when employees and representatives of the U.S.-based parent company authorized and made improper payments to foreign officials while trying to win contracts to supply firearm products to military and law enforcement overseas.

Smith & Wesson, which profited by more than $100,000 from the one contract that was completed before the unlawful activity was identified, has agreed to pay $2 million to settle the SEC’s charges.  The company must report to the SEC on its FCPA compliance efforts for a period of two years.

According to the SEC’s order instituting a settled administrative proceeding, the Springfield, Mass.-based firearms manufacturer sought to break into new markets overseas starting in 2007 and continuing into early 2010.  During that period, Smith & Wesson’s international sales staff engaged in a pervasive effort to attract new business by offering, authorizing, or making illegal payments or providing gifts meant for government officials in Pakistan, Indonesia, and other foreign countries.

“This is a wake-up call for small and medium-size businesses that want to enter into high-risk markets and expand their international sales,” said Kara Brockmeyer, chief of the SEC Enforcement Division’s FCPA Unit.  “When a company makes the strategic decision to sell its products overseas, it must ensure that the right internal controls are in place and operating.”  

According to the SEC’s order, Smith & Wesson retained a third-party agent in Pakistan in 2008 to help the company obtain a deal to sell firearms to a Pakistani police department.  Smith & Wesson officials authorized the agent to provide more than $11,000 worth of guns to Pakistani police officials as gifts, and then make additional cash payments.  Smith & Wesson ultimately won a contract to sell 548 pistols to the Pakistani police for a profit of $107,852.

The SEC’s order finds that Smith & Wesson employees made or authorized improper payments related to multiple other pending or contemplated international sales contracts.  For example, in 2009, Smith & Wesson attempted to win a contract to sell firearms to an Indonesian police department by making improper payments to its third-party agent in Indonesia.  The agent indicated he would provide a portion of that money to Indonesian officials under the guise of legitimate firearm lab testing costs.  He said Indonesian police officials expected to be paid additional amounts above the actual cost of testing the guns.  Smith & Wesson officials authorized and made the inflated payment, but a deal was never consummated.

The SEC’s order finds that Smith & Wesson also authorized improper payments to third-party agents who indicated that portions would be provided to foreign officials in Turkey, Nepal, and Bangladesh.  The attempts to secure sales contracts in those countries were ultimately unsuccessful. 

The SEC’s order finds that Smith & Wesson violated the anti-bribery, internal controls and books and records provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  The company agreed to pay $107,852 in disgorgement, $21,040 in prejudgment interest, and a $1.906 million penalty. Smith & Wesson consented to the order without admitting or denying the findings.  The SEC considered Smith & Wesson’s cooperation with the investigation as well as the remedial acts taken after the conduct came to light.  Smith & Wesson halted the impending international sales transactions before they went through, and implemented a series of significant measures to improve its internal controls and compliance process.  The company also terminated its entire international sales staff.

The SEC’s investigation was conducted by FCPA Unit members Mayeti Gametchu and Paul G. Block, who work in the Boston Regional Office.  The SEC appreciates the assistance of the Justice Department’s Fraud Section and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.