SEC ANNOUNCES PRISON SENTENCE FOR JEREMY FISHER FOR MISAPPROPRIATING INVESTOR FUNDS

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Litigation Release No. 23139 / November 24, 2014

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jeremy Fisher, The Good Life Financial Group, Inc., and The Good Life Global, LLC, Civil Action No. 3:13-cv-00683

Jeremy Fisher Sentenced to 30 Months for Offering Fraud

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that on October 27, 2014, the Honorable John E. Steele of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida sentenced Jeremy S. Fisher to 30 months in prison, followed by 3years of supervised release and ordered him to forfeit $500,000. The Court has scheduled a hearing to set the amount of restitution to be ordered on December 15, 2014. Fisher, 44, of La Crescent, Minnesota, had previously pled guilty to two counts of wire fraud for his role in stealing over $1 million from 18 victims in an investment scam. The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Central District of Florida filed criminal charges against Fisher on January 14, 2014. Fisher was ordered to surrender on December 1, 2014, to begin serving his prison sentence.

The criminal charges arose out of the same facts that were the subject of a settled civil enforcement action that the Commission filed against Fisher on September 30, 2013. The Commission's complaint alleges that from at least August 2009 through December 2012, Fisher raised approximately $1.04 million from approximately 18 investors who invested in unregistered securities offerings conducted by Fisher through his two companies. Fisher offered investors the opportunity to invest their money through a "special trading platform" that supposedly generated significant returns. Fisher told investors that their money would be deposited in an overseas bank account and used as collateral for the purchase and sale of collateralized debt obligations and medium term notes on the trading platform. However, Fisher instead fraudulently misappropriated and converted investors' funds for his personal use to pay previous investors, to purchase a house and car and to pay his daughter's tuition and other personal and business expenses. Fisher also provided quarterly statements to investors which falsely represented that investors were earning money on their investments. The Commission's complaint alleged that Fisher and his companies violated Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The complaint also alleged Fisher violated Section 15(a) of the Exchange Act.

On October 16, 2013 the Court in the Commission's case entered orders of permanent injunction and disgorgement, plus prejudgment, totaling $936,226 to be paid jointly and severally among Fisher and his companies and ordered Fisher to pay a civil penalty of $150,000. Fisher and his companies consented to the entry of the Court's orders.

SEC CHARGES EXECUTIVES OF PENNY STOCK COMPANY FOR ISSUING FALSE AND MISLEADING PRESS RELEASES

FROM:  U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged father-and-son executives at a New Jersey-based penny stock company for issuing false and misleading press releases while secretly selling thousands of their own stock shares into the market.  They agreed to pay nearly $325,000 and accept officer-and-director bars to settle the SEC’s charges.

Conolog Corporation’s public filings state that it manufactures communications equipment primarily for use by electric utilities, fiber optic service providers, and the military.  The SEC alleges that Conolog issued three consecutive press releases in early 2010 with distorted information at the behest of chairman and then-CEO Robert Benou with assistance from his son and company president Marc Benou.  Among the company’s mischaracterizations were that Conolog had secured $1.9 million in new equipment orders when, in fact, only $50,000 worth of new orders had been received at the time.  Conolog also created the misimpression that it had developed new fiber optic technology that was fully vetted and ready for commercial use and sale.  Marc Benou was quoted saying it “surpassed our expectations in field tests” when in reality there had been no independent third-party testing as implied in the press release.  The “testing” was merely an in-house demonstration of the product.

“Information released by a company into the marketplace must be truthful and substantiated so investors can make well-informed trading decisions,” said Andrew M. Calamari, Director of the SEC’s New York Regional Office.  “The Benous caused Conolog Corporation to issue press releases with false and misleading information that was used to promote the stock to unwitting investors.”

According to the SEC’s complaint filed in federal court in Newark, N.J., Robert Benou hired a public relations firm to promote Conolog’s stock using the false and misleading statements from the press releases.  The promotional efforts significantly increased the company’s stock price and trading volume, and Robert and Marc Benou made combined profits of more than $81,000 through undisclosed sales of some of their stock holdings at the artificially inflated prices.  They also each violated the federal securities laws requiring company insiders to disclose information about their holdings and transactions in company stock so other investors are aware of their moves.

“Officers and directors of public companies must promptly report their own purchases and sales of company stock so the marketplace has the benefit of knowing what insiders are doing with their shares,” said Sanjay Wadhwa, Senior Associate Director for Enforcement in the SEC’s New York Regional Office.  “Robert and Marc Benou ignored their responsibilities to shareholders as they bought and sold Conolog stock over the years without informing investors about their transactions on a timely basis.”

The SEC’s complaint charges Conolog Corporation and the Benous with violating the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws.  The complaint charges Robert and Marc Benou with violating securities law provisions requiring officers and directors of public companies to report their transactions in the company’s stock within two business days, and requiring all owners of more than 5 percent of a company’s stock to timely report the size of their holdings and any material changes to them.

Robert Benou agreed to settle the charges without admitting or denying the allegations by paying $77,490 in disgorgement of illegal profits made from selling Conolog stock as the misleading press releases were issued.  He also must pay prejudgment interest of $12,400 and a penalty of $177,490, and will be permanently barred from acting as an officer or director of a public company or participating in penny stock offerings.  Marc Benou agreed to settle the charges by paying disgorgement of $4,191 plus prejudgment interest of $671 and a penalty of $51,250.  He will be barred for at least two years from acting as an officer or director of a public company or participating in penny stock offerings.  The settlement is subject to court approval.

The SEC’s investigation has been conducted by Justin P. Smith and George N. Stepaniuk of the New York office and supervised by Mr. Wadhwa.

SEC CHARGED UNREGISTERED BROKER WITH STEALING INVESTOR FUNDS IN DAY TRADING INVESTOR SCHEME

FROM:   U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
11/18/2014 05:30 PM EST

The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged an unregistered broker living outside Tampa, Fla., with stealing investor funds as part of a fraudulent day trading scheme.

The SEC alleges that Albert J. Scipione and his business partner solicited investors to establish accounts at their company called Traders Café for the purposes of day trading, which entails the rapid buying and selling of stocks throughout the day in hope that the stock values continue climbing or falling for the seconds to minutes they own them so they can lock in quick profits.  Scipione touted Traders Café’s software trading platform and made a series of false misrepresentations to investors about low commissions and fees, high trading leverage, and safety of their assets.  More than $500,000 was raised from investors who were assured that funds invested with Traders Café would be segregated and used only for day trading or other specific business purposes.  However, many customers encountered technical service problems that prevented them from trading at all, and Scipione and his business partner squandered nearly all of the money in investor accounts for their personal use.  Meanwhile, Traders Café was never registered with the SEC as a broker-dealer as required under the federal securities laws.

“Scipione portrayed Traders Café as a broker-dealer for customers interested in day trading, but it became merely a depository from which he stole investor funds for himself,” said Eric I. Bustillo, Director of the SEC’s Miami Regional Office.

The SEC previously charged Scipione’s business partner Matthew P. Ionno, who agreed to settle the case and has been barred from the securities industry.  Financial penalties will be decided by the court at a later date.

In a parallel action, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Florida today announced that Scipione has pleaded guilty to criminal charges.  The U.S. Attorney’s Office previously brought a criminal case against Ionno.

According to the SEC’s complaint filed against Scipione in federal court in Tampa, customers across the country deposited approximately $367,000 with Traders Café from December 2012 to October 2013 with the intention of opening day trading accounts.  Traders Café also received approximately $150,000 from an investor who invested directly in Traders Café’s business. Customers encountered problems with Traders Café from the outset, and many of them cancelled their accounts and requested refunds of their remaining account balances.  Scipione and Ionno tried to cover up their fraudulent scheme by offering excuses and delays for why customers could not get refunds.  Eventually less than $1,200 remained in Traders Café’s accounts primarily due to the repeated misuse of investor funds by Scipione and Ionno.

The SEC’s complaint against Scipione alleges that he violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 as well as Section 15(a) and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5.  The SEC seeks disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, financial penalties, and permanent injunctive relief to enjoin Scipione from future violations of the federal securities laws.

The SEC’s investigation was conducted by D. Corey Lawson and Tonya T. Tullis, and the SEC’s litigation is being led by Christopher E. Martin.  The SEC appreciates the assistance of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Florida, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Florida Office of Financial Regulation.

SEC CHARGES CANADIAN CO. IN ALLEGED PUMP-AND-DUMP SCHEME

FROM:  U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PUMP-AND-DUMP, SECURITIES FRAUD
Litigation Release No. 23135 / November 19, 2014

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Forum National Investments Ltd., et al., Civil Action No. 5:14-cv-02376 (C.D. Cal., filed November 18, 2014)

SEC Charges Canadian Life Settlement Company in Pump-And-Dump Scheme

On November 18, 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") charged a Canadian life settlement company, its CEO, and three other individuals for engaging in a pump-and-dump scheme that misled investors and artificially inflated the price of the company's stock. According to the Commission's complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Daniel Clozza, the CEO of Forum National Investments Ltd., and one of his associates, Robert Logan Dunn, hired two penny stock promoters, William Anguka and Alex Ghaznawi, to create and publish promotional materials about Forum during the summer of 2012. These materials, which Anguka and Ghaznawi posted on the internet under fake and assumed names, made false and misleading statements about Forum, fabricated quotes and "buy" recommendations from stock analysts who did not cover the company, and claimed that a fictitious entity named "Welsson Financial Media" funded the promotion. At the same time, the complaint alleges, Clozza caused Forum to issue press releases that made false and misleading statements about the company, including the launch and success of a non-existent bond offering. The defendants' scheme caused significant increases in the trading volume and price of Forum stock - from $0.36 per share on a volume of 15,000 shares to $1.90 on a volume of 254,000 shares - from which Clozza's relatives and associates, including Dunn, profited by selling more than one million shares in the public markets.

The Commission's complaint alleges that Forum, Clozza, Dunn, Anguka, and Ghaznawi violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, that Anguka and Ghaznawi violated Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 and that Dunn aided and abetted those violations, and that Forum violated Section 13(a) of the Securities Act and Rule 13a-1 thereunder. The complaint seeks permanent injunctions and financial penalties against each defendant, disgorgement with prejudgment interest and penny stock bars against the individual defendants, and an officer-and-director bar against Clozza.

Also on November 18, the Commission also instituted public administrative proceedings against Forum pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Exchange Act in order to determine whether to suspend or revoke the registration of the company's securities as a result of its failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the Exchange Act.

SEC SUSPENDS TRADING IN EBOLA RELATED COMPANIES

FROM:  U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
11/20/2014 10:30 AM EST

The Securities and Exchange Commission suspended trading in four companies that claim to be developing products or services in response to the Ebola outbreak, citing a lack of publicly available information about the companies’ operations.

The SEC simultaneously issued an investor alert warning about the potential for fraud in microcap companies purportedly involved in Ebola prevention, testing, or treatment, noting that scam artists often exploit the latest crisis in the news cycle to lure investors into supposedly promising investment opportunities.

The SEC Enforcement Division and its Microcap Fraud Task Force work to proactively identify microcap companies that are publicly disseminating information that appears inadequate or potentially inaccurate.  The SEC has authority to issue trading suspensions against such companies.  The companies whose trading was suspended today are Patchogue, N.Y.-based Bravo Enterprises Ltd., Monrovia, Calif.-based Immunotech Laboratories Inc., Toronto-based Myriad Interactive Media Inc., and Anaheim, Calif.-based Wholehealth Products Inc.

“We move quickly to protect investors when we see thinly-traded stocks being promoted with questionable information that make them ripe for pump-and-dump schemes,” said Elisha Frank, Co-Chair of the SEC Enforcement Division’s Microcap Fraud Task Force.  “Fraudsters are constantly exploiting issues of public concern to tout a penny stock company supposedly in the business of addressing the latest crisis.”

Under the federal securities laws, the SEC can suspend trading in a stock for 10 days and generally prohibit a broker-dealer from soliciting investors to buy or sell the stock again until certain reporting requirements are met.  More information about the trading suspension process is available in an SEC investor bulletin on the topic.

According to the SEC’s investor alert, similar to how natural disasters such as Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Sandy have given rise to investment schemes for companies purportedly involved in cleanup efforts, con artists may perpetrate investment scams related to Ebola prevention or treatment efforts.  The alert suggests that investors be wary about promises or guarantees of high investment returns with little or no risk, avoid solicitations with pressure to “buy RIGHT NOW,” and beware of unsolicited investment offers through social media.

CFTC DMO RULE ENFORCEMENT REVIEWS ISSUED FOR CBOT, COMEX, CME, NYME

FROM:  U.S.COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 
November 24, 2014

CFTC DMO Issues Rule Enforcement Reviews of the Chicago Board of Trade, Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Commodity Exchange, Inc. and New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc.

Washington, DC — The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s Division of Market Oversight (Division) today issued three separate rule enforcement reviews of certain Designated Contract Markets (DCMs).

The Division’s reviews assessed compliance with Commodity Exchange Act Core Principles for DCMs and related regulations with respect to: (1) the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) and Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) audit trail program; (2) the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) and Commodity Exchange (COMEX) trade practice surveillance program; and (3) the CBOT, CME, COMEX, and NYMEX (collectively, the Exchanges) disciplinary program.

Overall, the Division found the Exchanges’ respective programs to be generally in compliance with the assessed DCM core principles and Commission regulations. However, the Division’s reviews identified certain deficiencies – areas where an exchange is not in compliance with a Commission regulation and must take corrective action, and recommendations – areas where an exchange should improve its compliance program. The deficiencies and recommendations identified in the reviews are summarized below.

CBOT and CME Audit Trail Program

Deficiencies:

• As required by Commission regulation § 38.553(a)(1), CBOT and CME must ensure that their program for reviewing front-end audit trail data is effective and the reviews are conducted in a timely manner.

• As required by Commission regulation § 38.553(a)(1), CBOT and CME must develop a program to at least annually review and enforce the assignment process of user IDs to automated trading models, algorithms, programs, and system in order to enforce the CBOT and CME’s user ID (Tag 50) policy.

• As required by Commission regulation § 38.553(b), CBOT and CME must ensure that the minimum summary fine amount for electronic trading audit trail deficiencies on each exchange is “meaningful” and “sufficient to deter recidivist behavior.” This minimum summary fine amount should be published in the Exchanges’ rules.

NYMEX and COMEX Trade Practice Surveillance Program

Deficiency:

• As required by Commission regulation § 38.158(b), NYMEX and COMEX must complete investigations in one year or less, absent mitigating circumstances.

Recommendations:

• NYMEX and COMEX should implement a system which would enable Market Regulation staff to efficiently track connections between related trade practice matters (complaints, research files, and cases) and thereby identify the source of time delays.

• NYMEX and COMEX should continue to develop strategies to detect spoofing.

• NYMEX and COMEX should reduce the time they take to complete pre-investigative trade practice matters (research files and complaints).

CBOT, CME, COMEX, and NYMEX Disciplinary Program

Deficiency:

• As required by Commission regulation § 38.701, the Exchanges must maintain sufficient enforcement staff to promptly prosecute possible rule violations.

Recommendation:

• The Exchanges should take appropriate measures to ensure that internal deliberations do not interfere with the prompt resolution of disciplinary matters.

Copies of the reports are available from the Commission’s Office of Public Affairs, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street N.W., Washington, DC 20581, 202-418-5080, or by accessing the Commission’s website at www.cftc.gov.

Last Updated: November 24, 2014