SEC CHARGES SALES EXEC. FOR ROLE IN FINANCIAL FRAUD INVOLVING CANADIAN ENERGY SERVICES BUSINESS

FROM:  U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Litigation Release No. 23191 / February 6, 2015

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Joseph A. Kostelecky, Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-00017-CSM (D.N.D.)

SEC Charges Sales Executive in North Dakota for Enabling Financial Fraud

The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged a former senior sales executive living in North Dakota for his role in a financial fraud that occurred at a Canadian oil-and-gas services company Poseidon Concepts Corp.

The SEC alleges that Joseph A. Kostelecky, who was the company's only senior executive in the U.S., was among those responsible for Poseidon's fraudulent reporting of approximately $100 million in revenues for contracts that were either non-existent or uncollectable. Poseidon's business in the U.S. was focused on renting above-ground fluid storage tanks for oil-and-gas hydraulic fracturing operations. According to the SEC's complaint filed in federal court in North Dakota, Kostelecky directed Poseidon's accounting staff to record revenues for inadequately documented transactions and made false assurances to several members of Poseidon's management in Canada that transactions with U.S. customers were valid and collectible. Poseidon consequently issued three quarterly financial statements from January to November 2012 with materially inflated revenues while its stock was trading in the U.S. and Canada. The magnitude of the overstatements was substantial, comprising approximately 64 to 72 percent of total revenues reported over the first three fiscal quarters of 2012.

When Poseidon later announced publicly that it would need to restate its financials due to the inflated revenues, its stock price collapsed and the company eventually filed for bankruptcy. Poseidon was based in Calgary and operated a subsidiary with offices in Denver and Dickinson, N.D., where Kostelecky still resides.

Kostelecky agreed to settle the SEC's charges by paying a $75,000 penalty and being barred from serving as an officer or director of a U.S. publicly-traded company. Without admitting or denying the SEC's allegations, Kostelecky consented to a final judgment enjoining him from violations of Sections 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. The SEC's action against Kostelecky was filed in conjunction with an enforcement proceeding by the Alberta Securities Commission against Poseidon's senior management, including Kostelecky.

The SEC's investigation was conducted by Lee Robinson, Donna Walker, and Ian Karpel in the Denver Regional Office. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the Alberta Securities Commission.

# # #

ALLEGED FRAUD BY KOHL'S MERCHANDISE EXECUTIVE

FROM: U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 
On October 24, 2012, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged Michael Johnson, a divisional merchandise manager at Kohl's, which is a national department store. The complaint alleged that Johnson assisted the financial fraud at Carter's, Inc, an Atlanta-based manufacturer of children's clothing. Specifically, the SEC alleges that Johnson assisted Joseph Elles, a former Executive Vice President of Sales at Carter's, in concealing his financial fraud from senior Carter's management. That scheme caused Carter's to materially misstate its net income and expenses in several financial reporting periods between 2004 and 2009.

The SEC's complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, alleges that between 2004 and 2009, Elles fraudulently manipulated the amount of discounts that Carter's granted to Kohl's, Carter's largest wholesale customer in order to induce Kohl's to purchase greater quantities of Carter's clothing for resale. In an effort to conceal the scheme, Elles persuaded Kohl's to defer subtracting the discounts from payments until later periods. Elles also persuaded Johnson, who handled the Carter's account at Kohl's to sign a false confirmation that misrepresented to Carter's accounting personnel the timing and amount of those discounts. By concealing the amount of discounts that had been promised to Kohl's, Elles and Johnson caused Carter's to materially understate it expenses in certain quarters and materially overstate its earnings in those quarters.

After conducting its own internal investigation, Carter's was required to issue restated financial results for the affected periods.

The SEC's complaint alleges that Johnson violated Rule 13b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"), which prohibits any person from directly or indirectly falsifying or causing to be falsified an issuer's accounting records. The complaint also alleges that Johnson aided and abetted Elles' violations of Section 13b(5) of the Exchange Act, which among other things, prohibits any person from knowingly falsifying the books, records and/or accounts of an issuer, and Rule 13b2-1 thereunder. The SEC is seeking permanent injunctive relief and financial penalties against Johnson.

This is the third case that the SEC has filed in this continuing investigation. The Commission previously charged Joseph Elles (see SEC v. Joseph Elles, Litigation Release No. 21784 / December 20, 2010) and Joseph Pacifico (see Litigation Release No. 22517 / October 19, 2012). When the Commission announced the first case, the Commission also announced that it had entered into a non-prosecution agreement with Carter's, based in part on Carter's prompt and complete self-reporting of the misconduct to the SEC, its exemplary and extensive cooperation in the investigation, including undertaking a thorough and comprehensive internal investigation, and Carter's extensive and substantial remedial actions. See Release No. 2010-252 / December 20, 2010. Pursuant to that agreement, Carter's has continued to cooperate during the Commission's continuing investigation.

BILLION DOLLAR HEDGE FUND ADVISORY FIRM CHARGED WITH THE OVERVALUE OF ASSETS

FROM: U.S SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C., Oct. 17, 2012 – The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged a former $1 billion hedge fund advisory firm and two executives with scheming to overvalue assets under management and exaggerate the reported returns of hedge funds they managed in order to hide losses and increase the fees collected from investors.

The SEC alleges that New Jersey-based Yorkville Advisors LLC, founder and president Mark Angelo, and chief financial officer Edward Schinik enticed pension funds and other investors to invest in their hedge funds by falsely portraying Yorkville as a firm that managed a highly-collateralized investment portfolio and employed a robust valuation procedure. They misrepresented the safety and liquidity of the investments made by the hedge funds, and charged excessive fees to the funds based on the fraudulently inflated values of the investments.

This is the seventh case arising from the SEC’s Aberrational Performance Inquiry, an initiative by the Enforcement Division’s Asset Management Unit that uses proprietary risk analytics to identify hedge funds with suspicious returns. Performance that is flagged as inconsistent with a fund’s investment strategy or other benchmarks forms a basis for further investigation and scrutiny.

"The analytics put Yorkville front and center on our radar screen," said Bruce Karpati, Chief of the SEC Enforcement Division’s Asset Management Unit. "When we looked further we found lies to investors and the firm’s auditors as well as a scheme to inflate fees by grossly overvaluing fund assets. We will continue to pursue hedge fund managers whose success is based on fiction rather than fact."

According to the SEC’s complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, Yorkville, Angelo, and Schinik defrauded investors in the YA Global Investments (U.S.) LP and YA Offshore Global Investments Ltd hedge funds.

The SEC alleges that Yorkville and the two executives:
Failed to adhere to Yorkville’s stated valuation policies.
Ignored negative information about certain investments by the funds.
Withheld adverse information about fund investments from Yorkville’s auditor, which enabled Yorkville to carry some of its largest investments at inflated values.
Misled investors about the liquidity of the funds, collateral underlying the investments, and Yorkville’s use of a third-party valuation firm.
The SEC alleges that by fraudulently making Yorkville’s funds more attractive to potential investors, Angelo and Schinik enticed more than $280 million in investments from pension funds and funds of funds. This enabled Yorkville to charge the funds at least $10 million in excess fees based on the inflated values of Yorkville’s assets under management.

The SEC’s complaint charges Yorkville with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5. Yorkville also is charged with violating Sections 206(1), (2) and (4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Rule 206(4)-8. Angelo is charged with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5, and Sections 206(1), (2) and (4) of the Advisers Act and Rule 206(4)-8. He also is charged with aiding and abetting Yorkville’s violations of the Exchange Act and Advisers Act. Schinik is charged with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5, and with aiding and abetting Yorkville’s violations of the Exchange Act and Advisers Act.

The SEC’s Aberrational Performance Inquiry is a joint effort among staff in its Division of Enforcement, Office of Compliance, Inspections and Examinations, and Division of Risk, Strategy and Financial Innovation. The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Stephen B. Holden, Brian Fitzpatrick, and Kenneth Gottlieb with the support of Frank Milewski under the supervision of Valerie A. Szczepanik and Ken Joseph. The SEC’s litigation is being led by Todd Brody.

SEC AGREES TO A SETTLEMENT IN ALLEGED BOOK-COOKING CASE AGAINST BRITISH BASED FIRM

The following excerpt is from the SEC website:

January 30, 2012
“The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced four enforcement actions arising from an alleged financial fraud spanning several years at a British subsidiary of the NYSE-listed Symmetry Medical, Inc. (“Symmetry”).

First, the Commission announced today that it has filed and, subject to Court approval, simultaneously settled charges against Richard J. Senior, Matthew Bell, Lynne Norman and Shaun P. Whiteley arising from the alleged financial fraud. According to the Commission’s Complaint, the fraud was orchestrated and carried out by senior executives and accounting staff of the Sheffield, England-based Symmetry Medical Sheffield LTD, f/k/a Thornton Precision Components, Limited (hereinafter “TPC”), particularly by Senior, Bell, Norman and Whiteley, who were, respectively, Symmetry’s VP for European Operations, TPC’s Finance Director, TPC’s Controller and a TPC Management Accountant. According to the Complaint, the fraud involved the systematic understatement of expenses and overstatement of assets and revenues, and materially distorted the financial statements of the Indiana-headquartered Symmetry, into which TPC’s financials were consolidated, for a period running from Symmetry’s December 2004 initial public offering through its second fiscal quarter of 2007. The Complaint further alleges that during the fraud, Senior, Bell and Norman made false certifications as to the accuracy of the financial information reported to Symmetry by TPC, and lied to TPC’s outside auditors. Finally, the Complaint alleges that Senior and Bell sold Symmetry stock during the fraud, at prices each knew or recklessly disregarded were inflated by the fraud at TPC.

According to the Complaint, by their conduct, Senior, Bell, Norman and Whiteley violated Sections 10(b) and 13(b)(5) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Rules 10b-5 and 13b2-1 thereunder, and aided and abetted Symmetry’s violation of Exchange Act Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B), and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder; Senior and Bell also violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933; and Senior, Bell and Norman also violated Exchange Act Rule 13b2-2. The four defendants’ signed Consents—which are subject to approval by the Court—provide that, without admitting or denying the Commission’s allegations, defendants Senior, Bell and Norman would be barred from serving as an officer or director of any public company. (Additionally, Bell, Norman and Whiteley each consented to be permanently barred, in follow-on administrative proceedings, from appearing or practicing before the Commission as accountants.) The final judgment to which Bell consented further orders that he is liable for disgorgement of $136,209 together with $50,728 in prejudgment interest thereon, but, based on his sworn financial statements and supporting documentation, waives payment of disgorgement and prejudgment interest; and the judgment to which Senior consented defers resolution of the monetary portion of his case pending the completion of asset discovery, with which Senior would be ordered to cooperate. Each defendant would also be permanently enjoined against future violations of the statutes and rules each is alleged to have violated.

The Commission also announced that it has filed, and, subject to Court approval, simultaneously settled, a civil action against Symmetry’s former CEO, Brian S. Moore, seeking reimbursement for bonuses and other incentive-based and equity-based compensation pursuant Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Commission’s Complaint alleges that Symmetry was required to restate its annual financial statements for 2005 and 2006, as well as other reporting periods, as a result of misconduct in the reporting of TPC’s financials. The Complaint further alleges that Moore received from Symmetry bonuses and incentive-based and equity-based compensation, and realized profits from the sale of Symmetry stock, during the 12-month periods following the restated financials, but has made no reimbursement thereof. The Complaint does not allege that Moore engaged in the fraud. Moore’s signed Consent—which is subject to approval by the Court—provides that, without admitting or denying the Commission’s allegations, Moore would agree to issuance of a Final Judgment ordering him make reimbursement of $450,000 to Symmetry.

The Commission further announced that, separately, it has instituted and simultaneously settled administrative proceedings against two Associate Chartered Accountants in the United Kingdom, Christopher J. Kelly and Margaret Hebb née Whyte, who were the former audit partner and audit manager, respectively, on Ernst & Young UK LLP’s audits of TPC for the 2004 through 2006 fiscal years (in the case of Kelly) and for the 2005 and 2006 fiscal years (in the case of Hebb). Kelly and Hebb consented to issuance of the Commission’s Order and the sanctions it imposed, without admitting or denying the Order’s findings. The Order found that both Kelly and Hebb engaged in improper professional conduct by, among other things, failing to properly audit TPC’s accounts receivable balances and inventory. Based on these findings, the Order suspended both Kelly and Hebb from appearing or practicing before the Commission as accountants, with the opportunity to seek reinstatement after two years. See Matter of Christopher J. Kelly, ACA and Margaret Hebb, ACA, Admin. Proc. File No. 3-____ (Jan. 30, 2012)

Finally, the Commission further announced that, separately, it has instituted and simultaneously settled administrative proceedings against Symmetry and its CFO, Fred L. Hite. Symmetry and Hite consented to issuance of the Commission’s Order and the sanctions it imposed, without admitting or denying the Order’s findings. With respect to Symmetry, the Order found that, as a result of the fraud at TPC, Symmetry (i) filed periodic reports with the Commission that included materially false and misleading financial statements in violation of Exchange Act Section 13(a) and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13 and (ii) maintained materially inaccurate books, records and accounts in violation of Exchange Act Section 13(b)(2)(a); and that Symmetry also failed to devise and maintain effective internal accounting controls in violation of Exchange Act Section 13(b)(2)(B). With respect to Hite, the Order found that by failing to provide an internal audit status report concerning TPC to Symmetry’s Audit Committee in July 2006, Hite violated Exchange Act Section 13(b)(5) and was a cause of Symmetry’s violation of Exchange Act Section 13(b)(2)(B); and that by failing to reimburse Symmetry for bonuses, incentive- and equity-based compensation, and Symmetry stock-sale proceeds he received during periods embraced by Symmetry’s restatement, Hite violated Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Based on the foregoing findings, the Commission ordered Symmetry and Hite to cease-and-desist from committing or causing future violations of the relevant provisions, and ordered Hite to pay a $25,000 penalty and make reimbursement of $185,000 to Symmetry. “