FORMER EXECUTIVE AT CKE RESTAURANTS CHARGED WITH INSIDER TRADING

The following excerpt is from the SEC website:
March 16, 2012
SEC CHARGES FORMER EXECUTIVE AT CKE RESTAURANTS WITH INSIDER TRADING
On March 15, 2012, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged a former executive at the parent company of Carl’s Jr. and Hardee’s fast food restaurants with insider trading in the company’s securities based on confidential information he learned on the job.

The SEC alleges that Noah J. Griggs, Jr., who was executive vice president of training and leadership development at CKE Restaurants Inc., made two purchases totaling 50,000 shares of CKE stock after attending an executive meeting during which he learned that the company was in discussions with private equity investors about a possible acquisition. Griggs made a potential profit of $145,430 after the stock price soared when the merger was announced publicly. Griggs has agreed to pay $268,000 to settle the SEC’s charges without admitting or denying the allegations.

According to the SEC’s complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Griggs attended a monthly strategic planning meeting on Friday, Nov. 20, 2009. CKE’s CEO cautioned the executives that information about the potential merger was confidential and nonpublic, and that no one should act on it. Nonetheless, on Monday morning November 23, Griggs bought 30,000 shares of CKE. He bought an additional 20,000 shares on Jan. 8, 2010. CKE and Thomas H. Lee Partners (THL) publicly announced a definitive merger on February 26 in which THL would acquire CKE. On news of the announcement, the value of Griggs’s shares increased significantly as CKE stock closed at $11.37 per share, up more than 27 percent from the previous day’s closing price of $8.91.

CKE Restaurants, Inc. is based in Carpinteria, California, and is the parent company of Carl Karcher Enterprises, which owns the fast-food restaurant brands of Carl’s Jr. and Hardee’s. Its common stock was listed on the NYSE under the ticker symbol CKR until July 13, 2010, when the NYSE suspended trading of the stock following the company’s acquisition by Columbia Lake Acquisition Holdings, Inc.

The SEC’s complaint charges Griggs with violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5(a) and (c). Griggs agreed to pay disgorgement of $145,430, prejudgment interest of $11,035.74, and a penalty of $111,730. He also agreed to the entry of a final judgment permanently enjoining him from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 and barring him from serving as an officer or director of a public company for 10 years. The settlement is subject to court approval.

The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Los Angeles Regional Office enforcement staff Lorraine Echavarria and Carol Lally. The SEC acknowledges the assistance of NYSE Regulation, Inc. in this matter.

SEC ALLEGES A FORMER EMPLOYEE OF TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS TRADED ON INSIDE INFORMATION

The following excerpt is from the Securities and Exchange Commission website:

“On February 9, 2012, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged that a former employee of Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. traded on inside information about the Japanese firm’s business alliances and corporate acquisitions.

Brent Bankosky, a former Senior Director in Takeda’s U.S.-based business development group, has agreed to pay more than $136,000 to settle the SEC’s charges. The proposed settlement is subject to the approval of Judge Harold Baer, Jr. of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Under the proposed settlement, the Court, upon motion by the Commission, will determine whether to impose an officer-and-director bar against Bankosky.

The SEC’s complaint, filed in federal court in Manhattan, alleges that Bankosky reaped more than $63,000 of profits, achieving a 169% rate of return, by trading on non-public information about two business transactions in 2008. Takeda’s business development group worked on the transactions, a strategic alliance with Cell Genesys, Inc., and the acquisition of Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., which were referred to internally by their code names, Project Ceres and Project Mercury. Bankosky’s trading violated U.S. securities laws and Takeda’s policies, which forbade employees from disclosing or trading based on inside information.

“Brent Bankosky was entrusted with highly confidential information of Takeda and betrayed that trust to line his own pocket,” said George S. Canellos, Director of the SEC’s New York Regional Office.  “His is another cautionary tale of an employee who succumbed to greed and the delusion that he wouldn’t get caught.”

Sanjay Wadhwa, Associate Director of the SEC’s New York Regional Office and Deputy Chief of the Market Abuse Unit, added, “We are determined to rid the U.S. marketplace of illegal insider trading, and we will pursue it wherever we find it, irrespective of whether it’s a hedge fund reaping millions of dollars in illicit gains or an individual investor hoping to fly under the radar by making relatively small insider trading profits.”

According to the SEC’s complaint, almost immediately after Bankosky joined Takeda in January 2008 as a Director in its business development group, he began to misuse confidential corporate information for his personal benefit. In February 2008, Bankosky began placing trades in his personal brokerage account based on non-public information about Takeda’s proposed strategic alliance with Cell Genesys, which was announced in March. Starting in March 2008, Bankosky made additional trades for his own account based on non-public information about Takeda’s plan to acquire Millennium, which was announced in April. Bankosky also traded on other confidential information in 2009 and 2010, purchasing call options in the securities of Arena Pharmaceutical, Inc., and AMAG Pharmaceutical, Inc., respectively, when the firms were engaged in confidential discussions on business transactions with Takeda. Bankosky, who was promoted to Senior Director of Takeda’s business development group in September 2010, resigned from Takeda in May 2011.

The SEC’s complaint charges Bankosky with violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5, as well as Section 14(e) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14e-3.  The complaint seeks a final judgment ordering Bankosky to pay a financial penalty and disgorge his ill-gotten gains plus prejudgment interest, preventing him from serving as an officer or director of a public company, and permanently enjoining him from future violations of those provisions of the federal securities laws.” 

SEC AMENDS COMPLAINT AGAINST THREE SWISS BUSINESSES IN ARCH CHEMICALS INC., INSIDER TRADING CASE

The following excerpt is from the SEC website:

“The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that it has filed an amended complaint in a pending action against three Swiss-based entities previously charged with insider trading. On July 15, 2011, the Commission filed a complaint charging defendants Compania International Financiera S.A. (Compania”), Coudree Capital Gestion S.A. (“Coudree”), and Chartwell Asset Management Services (“Chartwell”) with insider trading in violation of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, alleging that the defendants traded ahead of a July 11, 2011 public announcement that Swiss-based Lonza Group Ltd. would acquire Connecticut-based Arch Chemicals, Inc.
Today the Commission filed an amended complaint adding an additional claim for relief under the tender offer antifraud provisions of the Exchange Act, specifically Section 14(e) and Rule 14e-3 thereunder. The Commission amended its complaint because the Lonza acquisition of Arch Chemicals was in the form of a tender offer. The Commission’s amended complaint now charges the defendants with violating Sections 10(b) and 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5 and Rule 14e-3. The amended complaint seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement of illegal trading profits plus prejudgment interest, and civil monetary penalties.
The Commission’s action remains pending.”

SEC FREEZES ASSETS OF FOUR CHINESE CITIZENS CHARGED WITH INSIDER TRADING

The following excerpt is from the SEC website: “On December 5, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged four Chinese citizens and a Chinese-based entity with insider trading and obtained an emergency court order to freeze their assets after they reaped more than $2.7 million in profits by trading in advance of a recent public announcement of a merger agreement between London-based Pearson plc and Beijing-based Global Education and Technology Group, Ltd. The SEC’s complaint names Sha Chen, Song Li, Lili Wang, Zhi Yao, All Know Holdings Ltd., and one or more unknown purchasers of Global Education stock as defendants. The SEC alleges that they purchased American Depository Shares (ADS) of Global Education in the two weeks leading up to a November 21 public announcement of a planned merger between the two education companies. Some of the defendants’ brokerage accounts were dormant until they bet heavily on Global Education shares, and some of the purchases made either equaled or exceeded the stated annual income of that trader. After the agreement was announced, they immediately began selling some of their Global Education shares. Their illicit gains totaled more than $2.7 million. According to the SEC’s complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court in Chicago, Pearson and Global Education each announced before trading began on November 21 that Pearson agreed to acquire all of Global Education’s outstanding stock for $294 million ($11.006 per share traded in the U.S.). Global Education’s stock price increased 97 percent that day, from $5.37 to $10.60. The SEC alleges that the defendants made their purchases of Global Education’s shares while in possession of material, non-public information about the merger. A Global Education co-founder apparently tipped Wang and possibly others about the potential acquisition. Wang then transferred new funds into her previously dormant brokerage account and bought 28,000 Global Education shares. The others also engaged in similarly suspicious trading in Global Education stock, which was typically thin. On November 18, the last trading day before the acquisition announcement, their purchases accounted for more than 35 percent of the entire day’s trading volume for the company’s shares, which trade on the NASDAQ. The SEC alleges that the defendants each violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. In addition to the emergency relief, the SEC seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest, and financial penalties. The emergency court order that the SEC obtained on December 5 on an ex parte basis freezes approximately $2.7 million of defendants’ assets held in U.S. brokerage accounts and, among other things, grants expedited discovery and prohibits the defendants from destroying evidence. The investigation is continuing.

SEC ALLEGED CPA INSIDE TRADER WILL GIVES BACK GAINS PLUS TO PAY FINE

The following excerpt is from the SEC website: November 18, 2011 “The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that it has filed and, subject to Court approval, simultaneously settled charges against Mark A. Konyndyk, CPA, for insider trading in advance of a tender offer. The Commission’s complaint alleges that Konyndyk, a former manager in the Transaction Advisory Services Group of Ernst & Young (“E&Y”), learned through his work at E&Y that Activision, Inc. was the target of highly confidential acquisition talks, code-named “Project Sego,” in which Vivendi S.A. was the potential acquirer. In particular, Konyndyk performed due-diligence work on Project Sego for E&Y’s client, Vivendi, billing 36 hours to the engagement. Both before and shortly after his departure from E&Y’s employ on November 2, 2007, including just days before the December 2, 2007, public announcement of the Vivendi-Activision merger, Konyndyk bought Activision out-of-the-money call options with near-term expirations. He sold the options shortly after the public announcement, earning gross profits of $9,725. Without admitting or denying the allegations, Konyndyk has agreed to settle the Commission’s allegations against him, and the complaint and settlement papers were submitted simultaneously to the Court for its consideration. In particular, Konyndyk signed a consent that provides—subject to approval by the Court—for the entry of a final judgment permanently enjoining him against future violations of the Section 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 14e-3 thereunder. The final judgment to which Konyndyk consented would further order that he is liable for disgorgement of $9,725 (comprising all the profits flowing from his own illegal trading) plus $1,789.28 in prejudgment interest thereon as well as a $9,725 civil penalty, but allow him one year to pay the foregoing sums. Additionally, Konyndyk consented, in related administrative proceedings, to the entry of a Commission order that would suspend him, pursuant to Commission Rule of Practice 102(e), from appearing or practicing before the Commission as an accountant, with a right to seek reinstatement after two years. If approved by the Court, this settlement would fully resolve this case. The Commission acknowledges the assistance of the Options Regulatory Surveillance Authority.”

SEC SETTLES INSIDER TRADING CHARGES AGAINST CALIFORNIA WOMAN

The following excerpt is from the SEC website: October 25, 2011 “The United States District Court for the Northern District of California approved a proposed settlement of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s insider trading claims against Annabel McClellan. The Commission alleged that Ms. McClellan obtained confidential information about pending mergers and acquisitions from her husband, a former partner in the San Francisco offices of Deloitte Tax LLP, to tip her sister and brother-in-law in London. As alleged by the Commission, Ms. McClellan’s relatives used the information to place trades in advance of the public announcements of the transaction, making millions of dollars in illicit profits. Without admitting or denying the Commission’s allegations, Ms. McClellan consented to pay a $1 million civil money penalty. Ms. McClellan also consented to the entry of a final judgment that will enjoin her permanently from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The court entered the final judgment against Ms. McClellan on October 25, 2011. Ms. McClellan previously pleaded guilty to one count of obstructing the Commission’s investigation into the insider trading scheme. The United Kingdom Financial Services Authority filed insider trading charges against Ms. McClellan’s relatives and three others in November 2010. In a related action, the Commission requested the dismissal of the insider trading claims against Ms. McClellan’s husband, Arnold A. McClellan.”

MARINER INSIDE TRADING CASE EXPANDS

The following excerpt is from the SEC website: October 24, 2011 "SEC v. H. Clayton Peterson, Drew Clayton Peterson, Drew K. Brownstein, and Big 5 Asset Management, LLC, Civil Action No. 11-CV-5448 (SDNY) (RPP) On October 21, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed an amended complaint in the case of SEC v. Clayton Peterson et al. (SDNY) adding charges against hedge fund manager Drew K. Brownstein and his hedge fund Big 5 Asset Management LLC for trading on confidential information in the securities of Mariner Energy Inc. ahead of the oil and gas company’s $3.9 billion takeover by Apache Corporation in April 2010. In its initial complaint filed on Aug. 5, 2011, the SEC alleged that Mariner Energy board member H. Clayton Peterson tipped his son with confidential details about Mariner Energy’s upcoming acquisition. Drew Clayton Peterson, who was a managing director at a Denver-based investment adviser, then used the inside information to purchase Mariner Energy stock for himself and others. The SEC now alleges that hedge fund manager Drew K. Brownstein who is a longtime friend of Drew Peterson, and the hedge fund advisory firm Brownstein controls, Big 5 Asset Management LLC traded Mariner Energy securities on the basis of inside information Brownstein received from Drew Peterson. Brownstein reaped illicit profits of more than $5 million combined in his own account, the accounts of his relatives, and the accounts of two hedge funds managed by Big 5. According to the SEC’s amended complaint, Drew Peterson repeatedly tipped Brownstein about the impending acquisition of Mariner Energy as he learned the information from his father. Brownstein caused two Big 5 hedge funds – the Lion Global Fund LLLP and the Lion Global Master Fund Ltd. – to purchase large quantities of Mariner Energy stock and call option contracts on the basis of the inside information. This was the first time that the Big 5 hedge funds had ever traded Mariner Energy stock or options. Brownstein also purchased thousands of shares of Mariner Energy stock and call option contracts for the accounts of his relatives and for his personal brokerage account. In the days following the announcement of the deal, Brownstein liquidated the positions he had accumulated in Mariner Energy securities. The SEC’s amended complaint charges each of the defendants with violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The complaint seeks a final judgment permanently enjoining them from future violations of the above provisions of the federal securities laws, ordering them to disgorge their ill-gotten gains plus prejudgment interest, and ordering them to pay financial penalties. The SEC also seeks to permanently prohibit Clayton Peterson from acting as an officer or director of any publicly registered company."

TWO ATTORNEYS SETTLE SEC CHARGES OF INSIDER TRADING

The following excerpt is from the SEC website: “The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that on October 17, 2011, the Honorable Richard J. Sullivan of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entered final judgments against Arthur J. Cutillo and Jason C. Goldfarb in SEC v. Cutillo et al., 09-CV-9208, an insider trading case the Commission filed on November 5, 2009. The Commission charged Cutillo and Goldfarb, practicing attorneys at the time of their illicit conduct, with violations of antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws. The Commission alleged that Cutillo misappropriated from his law firm, Ropes & Gray LLP, material, nonpublic information concerning upcoming corporate acquisitions, including the 2007 announced acquisitions of 3Com Corp. and Axcan Pharma Inc. The Commission further alleged that Cutillo, through his friend Goldfarb, tipped the information to Zvi Goffer, a former proprietary trader at the broker-dealer Schottenfeld Group, LLC., in exchange for kickbacks. As alleged in the complaint, Zvi Goffer traded on this inside information and had numerous downstream tippees who also traded on the information, including other Wall Street traders and hedge funds. To settle the Commission’s charges, Cutillo and Goldfarb each consented to the entry of a final judgment that: (i) permanently enjoins each from future violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder; and (ii) orders each to pay disgorgement of $32,500, plus $4,204 in prejudgment interest. In related administrative proceedings, the Commission suspended Cutillo and Goldfarb from appearing or practicing before the Commission pursuant to Rule 102(e)(2) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice. Cutillo and Goldfarb each previously pled guilty to charges of securities fraud and conspiracy to commit securities fraud in related criminal cases, United States v. Arthur Cutillo, 10-CR-0056 and United States v. Jason Goldfarb, 10-CR-0056 (S.D.N.Y.). Cutillo was sentenced to a 30 month prison term and ordered to pay a criminal forfeiture of $378,608. Goldfarb was sentenced to a three year prison term and ordered to pay a $32,500 fine and criminal forfeiture of $1,103,131“.

INSIDER TRADER CHARGED IN ACQUISITIONS OF MILLENNIUM PHARMACEUTICALS INC. AND SEPRACOR INC.

INSIDER TRADING: GETTING BY WITH A LITTLE HELP FROM YOUR FRIEND The following is an excerpt from the SEC website: “Washington, D.C., Sept. 15, 2011 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged a former global consulting firm executive and his friend who once worked on Wall Street with insider trading on confidential information about impending takeovers of two biotechnology companies. The SEC alleges that Scott Allen learned confidential information in advance of the acquisitions of Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Sepracor Inc. through his work at a global consulting firm that was advising the acquiring Japanese companies as they made cash tender offers. Allen allegedly tipped his longtime friend John Michael Bennett, an independent filmmaker who had previously worked at a Wall Street investment bank, as each acquisition took shape. On the basis of the nonpublic information, Bennett purchased thousands of dollars in call options in the companies and also tipped his business partner at the independent film company they co-own. The insider trading by Bennett and his tippee generated more than $2.6 million in illicit profits. Allen received cash from Bennett in exchange for the tips. In a parallel action, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York today announced the unsealing of criminal charges against Allen and Bennett. "Allen sold his clients' secret information to a dear friend for easy cash, thinking they wouldn't get caught," said George S. Canellos, Director of the SEC's New York Regional Office. "We will continue pursue every angle of investigation to uncover and punish this type of betrayal of trust." According to the SEC's complaint filed in federal court in Manhattan, Allen and Bennett have been close friends for more than 15 years. Their scheme allegedly began in February 2008 as Allen first learned about the Millennium transaction through his work at the consulting firm, where he is no longer employed. Allen communicated with Bennett about the Millennium and Sepracor transactions through either phone calls or in-person meetings, some of which are tracked through their simultaneous use of Metrocards at subway stations in New York City and ATM withdrawals of cash made by Bennett prior to those meetings. The SEC alleges that Allen first obtained nonpublic information about the Millennium transaction in mid-February 2008 when his firm began advising Japan-based Takeda Pharmaceutical Company during its negotiations with Millennium. Allen tipped Bennett with inside information concerning Takeda's impending cash tender offer to acquire Millennium's shares. For instance, after Allen received an evening e-mail on February 27 from a Takeda representative stating that the contemplated offer was for "23, potentially 24 per share," he called Bennett just minutes later and then twice again that evening. Bennett then called his business partner. More calls took place the following day, and then on February 29 and continuing up until the week prior to the April 10 public announcement of the acquisition, Bennett and his business partner began amassing Millennium call options. The price of Millennium shares increased more than 48 percent after the public announcement, and beginning that afternoon Bennett and his business partner sold their entire positions of Millennium call options for ill-gotten gains of more than $602,000 and $1.12 million respectively. According to the SEC's complaint, Allen later was participating in his employer's due diligence work in May 2009 for Japanese firm Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma Co. Ltd. (DSP) in connection with its impending acquisition of Sepracor. Allen again tipped Bennett with inside information about the upcoming transaction. In the months leading up to the September 3 public announcement that DSP had agreed to acquire Sepracor through a cash tender offer, Bennett purchased thousands of dollars worth of call options in Sepracor and again tipped his business partner who did the same. Following the public announcement, Sepracor's stock price rose more than 26 percent. Both Bennett and his business partner then liquidated their Sepracor holdings for ill-gotten profits of more than $516,000 and $388,000 respectively. The SEC's complaint names Bennett's wife as a relief defendant for the purposes of seeking disgorgement of unlawful profits in brokerage accounts that Bennett held jointly with her. The SEC's complaint charges Scott Allen and John Michael Bennett with violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Section 14(e) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14e-3 thereunder. The complaint seeks a final judgment permanently enjoining the defendants from future violations of these provisions of the federal securities laws and ordering them to disgorge their ill-gotten gains plus prejudgment interest and pay financial penalties. The SEC's investigation was conducted by Charles D. Riely and Amelia A. Cottrell of the SEC's Market Abuse Unit in New York and Layla Mayer of the SEC's New York Regional Office. The SEC acknowledges the assistance of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, Federal Bureau of Investigation, and Options Regulatory Surveillance Authority. The SEC's investigation is continuing.”

ALLEGED INSIDE TRADERS AT TRIVIUM CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC, AGREE TO SETTLEMENT WITH SEC

“The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that, on July 18, 2011, the Honorable Jed S. Rakoff of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entered a consent judgment against Defendant Robert Feinblatt in SEC v. Feinblatt, 11-CV-0170, an insider trading case the SEC filed on January 10, 2011. Feinblatt was a co-founder and former principal of Trivium Capital Management LLC, a New York-based hedge fund investment adviser that has since wound down its investment management business. Previously, on July 11, 2011, the Court entered a consent judgment against Defendant Jeffrey Yokuty, formerly an analyst who reported to Feinblatt at Trivium. The Complaint alleged that Feinblatt and Yokuty engaged in insider trading in the securities of Polycom, Hilton, Google and Kronos. The complaint further alleged that a senior executive at Polycom and an employee at Market Street Partners, an investor relations firm that did work for Google, tipped Roomy Khan, an individual investor, to inside information that Khan passed on to Feinblatt and Yokuty. The Complaint alleged that Feinblatt and Yokuty then traded on the basis of this and other inside information given to them by Khan on behalf of Trivium’s hedge funds, reaping illicit profits for the funds of more than $15 million. To settle the SEC’s charges, Feinblatt consented to the entry of a judgment that: (i) permanently enjoins him from future violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder; and (ii) orders him to pay disgorgement of $829,765, plus $186,023 in prejudgment interest, plus a civil penalty of $1,659,530. Yokuty consented to the entry of a judgment that: (i) permanently enjoins him from future violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder; and (ii) orders him to pay disgorgement of $127,595.10, plus $34,935.12 in prejudgment interest, plus a civil penalty of $127,595.10. In separate administrative proceedings, instituted against Feinblatt on September 2, 2011, and Yokuty on July 22, 2011, Feinblatt and Yokuty each consented to be barred from association with any broker, dealer, investment adviser, municipal securities dealer, or transfer agent. Feinblatt may apply for reentry after 5 years and Yokuty may apply for reentry after 3 years.”

ALLEGED INSIDER TRADER GETS FINAL JUDGMENT

The following is an excerpt from the SEC website: "The SEC announced that the Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, entered a Final Judgment as to Daniel L. DeVore on July 12, 2011, in the SEC’s insider trading case, SEC v. Mark Anthony Longoria, et al., 11-CV-0753 (SDNY) (JSR). The SEC filed its Complaint on February 3, 2011, charging two expert network employees and four consultants with insider trading for illegally tipping hedge funds and other investors. On February 8, 2011, the SEC filed an Amended Complaint, charging a New York-based hedge fund and four hedge fund portfolio managers and analysts who illegally traded on confidential information obtained from technology company employees moonlighting as expert network consultants. The scheme netted more than $30 million from trades based on material, nonpublic information about such companies as AMD, Seagate Technology, Western Digital, Fairchild Semiconductor, and Marvell. The charges were the first against traders in the SEC's ongoing investigation of insider trading involving expert networks.
The SEC alleged that DeVore, a Global Supply Manager at Dell, was privy to confidential information about Dell’s internal sales forecasts as well as information about the pricing and volume of Dell’s purchases from its suppliers. DeVore regularly provided Primary Global Research LLC (“PGR”) and PGR clients with this inside information so it could be used to trade securities. From 2008 to 2010, DeVore received approximately $145,000 for talking to PGR and its clients.
The Final Judgment entered against DeVore: (1) permanently enjoins him from violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), Exchange Act Rule 10b-5, and Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933; (2) orders him liable for disgorgement of ill-gotten gains of $145,750, together with prejudgment interest of $6,098.50, for a total of $151,848.50; and (3) permanently bars him from acting as an officer or director of a public company. Based on DeVore’s agreement to cooperate with the SEC, the Court is not ordering Defendant to pay a civil penalty.”

SEC ALLEGES GIRLFRIEND’S INFO NETS CALIFORNIA MAN 3000 PROFIT IN DISNEY-MARVEL DEAL

The following excerpt is from the SEC website: Washington, D.C., Aug. 11, 2011 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged a California man with insider trading for a 3000 percent profit based on confidential information that he learned from his girlfriend prior to Walt Disney Company’s acquisition of Marvel Entertainment. The SEC alleges that Toby G. Scammell, who worked at an investment fund at the time, purchased highly speculative Marvel call options beginning in mid-August 2009. He secretly used money in his brother’s accounts over which he had been given control when his brother was deployed to serve in Iraq a few years earlier. Just before Scammell purchased many of the Marvel securities, he searched the Internet for such terms as “insider trading,” “material, non-public information,” and “Rule 10b-5.” According to the SEC’s complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Scammell’s girlfriend worked on the Marvel acquisition as an extern in Disney’s corporate strategy department, and she possessed confidential details about the pricing and timing of the deal. Scammell illegally traded on this non-public information in breach of his duty of trust and confidence to his girlfriend. Marvel’s stock price jumped more than 25 percent after the Aug. 31, 2009, public announcement, and Scammell then sold all of his Marvel options. He didn’t reveal his trades or profits to his brother or his girlfriend. “Scammell exploited his romantic relationship for a financial windfall. His misuse of confidential information gave him an unfair and illegal edge over other traders in the markets,” said Rosalind R. Tyson, Director of the SEC’s Los Angeles Regional Office.‬‪ According to the SEC’s complaint, Scammell and his girlfriend often discussed her work projects at Disney. Scammell lived with his girlfriend in her Los Angeles apartment in late July 2009 when the Marvel deal heated up at Disney and his girlfriend was assigned to work on it. She explained to Scammell in an e-mail that she could not tell him the name of the company involved because of “confidentiality,” but she noted that “it’s very recognizable and nothing I’ve mentioned before.” According to the SEC’s complaint, Scammell and his girlfriend had multiple discussions about whether she should delay her business school applications so that she could write about the high-profile acquisition she was working on at Disney as part of her business school applications. She worked long hours on the Marvel acquisition — sometimes from home — in the five weeks leading up to the deal. She received detailed information about the anticipated acquisition including the $50 per share acquisition price. Scammell had access and the password to his girlfriend’s Blackberry on occasion. The SEC alleges that Scammell obtained the identity of the acquisition target from his girlfriend by overhearing one or more of her Marvel-related conversations, seeing electronic or paper documents in her possession related to the Marvel acquisition, or through his own work-related conversations with her. For instance, when Scammell’s girlfriend learned that the acquisition would be announced by Labor Day, she informed him the timing of the announcement would allow them to attend her friend’s wedding. It was around this time that Scammell began searching the Internet regarding call options. According to the SEC’s complaint, Scammell had never before traded in Marvel securities, and had only one previous experience trading call options that was unsuccessful. In the weeks leading up to the Disney-Marvel announcement, Scammell made several purchases totaling more than $5,400 in Marvel call options with remarkable strike prices of $50 and $45 even though Marvel had never traded above $41.74. Most of the Marvel options that Scammell purchased were set to expire on September 19, just weeks after the announcement. Scammell’s trades were so unusual that his purchase of options represented 100 percent of the market in many instances. After the public announcement that Marvel would be acquired by Disney, Scammell sold his Marvel options for a profit of more than $192,000 — a 3000 percent return in less than a month. The SEC’s complaint alleges that Scammell had limited personal funds at the time, so he secretly used his older brother’s money to buy the majority of the Marvel call options. Scammell had obtained trading authority over his brother’s account when he was deployed to serve in Iraq with the U.S. Army. Scammell never told his brother that he had invested his money in Marvel or that his brother’s account had increased by more than $100,000 in less than one month as a result of the Marvel trades. The SEC’s complaint alleges that Scammell, who now lives in Greenbrae, Calif., violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The SEC seeks a permanent injunction, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest, and financial penalties. The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Teri M. Melson in the Los Angeles Regional Office, and the litigation effort will be led by Spencer E. Bendell. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the Options Regulatory Surveillance Authority. The SEC’s investigation is ongoing.‬‪ ‬‪‬‪

SEC ALLEGES INSIDER TRADING BY A COMPANY BOARD MEMBER

The following excerpt is from the SEC website: On August 5, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a civil injunctive action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York charging a former member of Mariner Energy Inc.’s board of directors, and his son, a securities industry professional, with illegally tipping and trading on the basis of inside information about the impending acquisition of Mariner Energy. The SEC’s complaint alleges that H. Clayton Peterson, who served on Mariner Energy, Inc.’s board of directors from 2006 through 2010, provided his son, Drew Clayton Peterson, with confidential information, learned during various board meetings, about Apache Corporation’s upcoming acquisition of Mariner Energy. According to the allegations, in the week leading up to the April 15, 2010 announcement, Clayton Peterson tipped his son on multiple telephone calls and at in-person meetings about the impending takeover. Drew Peterson, a managing director at a Denver-based investment adviser, then traded on the illegally obtained inside information and purchased Mariner Energy stock for himself, his relatives, his clients, and for a close friend. Drew Peterson also tipped other close friends as to the impending acquisition of Mariner Energy who also traded on the illegally obtained information. The insider trading by the Petersons and others generated more than $5.2 million in illicit profits. According to the SEC’s complaint, Clayton Peterson explicitly instructed his son, Drew Peterson, to purchase Mariner Energy stock for a family member based on positive news that the company was about to announce. As the announcement date neared, Clayton Peterson was even clearer in his discussions with his son, telling him that the company was going to be acquired and would no longer be a public company within a few days. Based on the inside information Drew Peterson learned from his father, Drew Peterson purchased Mariner Energy stock for his own accounts, as well as for his relatives, his clients, and for a close friend. In addition, Drew Peterson used the nonpublic information provided by his father to tip several close friends. One of those friends, a portfolio manager at a hedge fund, reaped approximately $5 million in illegal profits for himself, his hedge funds and his relatives. The SEC’s complaint charges Clayton Peterson and Drew Peterson with violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The complaint seeks a final judgment permanently enjoining the defendants from future violations of the above provisions of the federal securities laws, ordering them to disgorge their ill-gotten gains plus prejudgment interest on a joint and several basis, and ordering them to pay financial penalties. The SEC also seeks to permanently prohibit Clayton Peterson from acting as an officer or director of any registered public company.”

SEC ANNOUNCES A CONTINUED FREEZE ON ALLEGED INSIDER TRADER FUNDS

The following is an excerpt from the SEC website: August 1, 2011 The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that it has obtained court orders continuing asset freezes on more than $32 million in assets controlled by three Swiss entities charged with insider trading ahead of a July 11, 2011 public announcement that Swiss-based Lonza Group Ltd. will acquire Connecticut-based Arch Chemicals, Inc. The Commission filed its action on July 15, 2011, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, and the court issued a temporary asset freeze that day against defendants Compania International Financiera S.A. (Compania”), Coudree Capital Gestion S.A. (“Coudree”), and Chartwell Asset Management Services (“Chartwell”). The District Court has now entered orders continuing those asset freezes in specific amounts based on the size of the defendants’ profits plus potential penalty amounts. The Court entered an asset freeze order by consent as to defendants Compania and Coudree on July 26, 2011, freezing approximately $14.7 million of their assets. After a hearing as to defendant Chartwell on July 28, 2011, the court entered an order on July 29, 2011, freezing over $18 million of its assets. The Commission’s complaint was filed within days of the alleged insider trading. According to the Commission’s filings, Compania and Coudree purchased more than 687,000 common shares of Arch Chemicals between July 5 and July 8, mostly in accounts based in London, England. During the same time period, Chartwell purchased contracts for difference (“CFDs”) equivalent to 425,300 Arch Chemicals common shares through a brokerage account in London. The Court noted in its opinion and order that CFDs constitute securities as defined by the federal securities laws. Immediately after the acquisition announcement on July 11, the firms began selling the recently-purchased Arch Chemicals common stock and CFDs for millions of dollars in profits. The Commission’s complaint alleges that, at the time the defendants purchased the securities, they are believed to have been in possession of material, non-public information about Lonza’s proposed acquisition of Arch Chemicals. After a hearing on July 28, 2011, before the Honorable Denise L. Cote in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, the District Court on July 29, 2011, ordered an asset freeze against Chartwell in the amount of the trading profits ($4,651,995) plus a potential civil penalty of three times that amount ($13,955,985), totaling $18,607,980. The Court further ordered Chartwell to repatriate all assets obtained from the activities described in the Complaint to the United States, and to refrain from destroying any potentially discoverable materials related to the Complaint. In the Court’s Opinion and Order issued on July 29, Judge Cote found that “the discovery collected by the [Commission] … reveals a pattern of trading [by Chartwell] in the context of a tip that is not just consistent with, but also suggestive of, insider trading,” and concluded that the relief sought by the Commission was thus warranted because “there is a likelihood that the [Commission] will succeed on the merits in establishing a 10(b) violation” by Chartwell. Previously, on July 26, 2011, the District Court issued an asset freeze order by consent as to defendants Compania and Coudree. Those defendants have deposited $14,784,006 into a court-controlled bank account pending the outcome of the Commission’s action, including more than $7 million in trading profits, after agreeing to the entry of the asset freeze. The Commission’s complaint charges the defendants with violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. In addition to a preliminary injunction, asset freeze and other equitable relief, the complaint seeks a permanent injunction, disgorgement of illegal trading profits plus prejudgment interest, and civil monetary penalties. The Commission’s investigation is continuing. The Commission acknowledges the assistance of the FINRA Office of Fraud Detection and Market Intelligence in its investigation.”