NY INVESTOR RELATIONS FIRM PARTNERY CHARGED WITH INSIDER TRADING

FROM:  U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged a partner at a New York-based investor relations firm with insider trading on confidential information he learned about two clients while he helped prepare their press releases. 

The SEC alleges that Kevin McGrath sold his shares in Misonix Inc. upon learning that the company was set to announce disappointing financial results.  The SEC further alleges that McGrath bought stock in Clean Diesel Technologies Inc. when he learned about the company’s impending announcement of positive news, and he profited when its stock price nearly doubled.  McGrath’s illicit profits and avoided losses from insider trading in both companies totaled $11,776. 

McGrath, who lives in Brooklyn, N.Y., and works at Cameron Associates, agreed to settle the charges by paying disgorgement of $11,776, prejudgment interest of $1,492, and a penalty of $11,776, for a total of $25,044. 

“Investor relations firms owe their clients a duty to maintain in strict confidence the important and sensitive information that clients impart for the sole purpose of obtaining help and advice on how best to communicate forthcoming news to investors,” said Andrew M. Calamari, director of the SEC’s New York Regional Office.  “McGrath’s self-centered misconduct betrayed both his own firm and his firm’s clients whose confidential information he exploited for personal gain.”

The settlement also includes a “conduct-based injunction” that permanently requires McGrath to abstain from trading in the stock of any issuer for which he or his firm has performed any investor relations services within a one-year period.  His present or any future firm is required to provide written notice to a client upon any intent to sell shares received as compensation for services performed, and must receive written authorization for the sale from the management of that company.

“McGrath used one hand to help clients draft their press releases while using the other to trade illegally in their stock,” said Sanjay Wadhwa, senior associate director of the SEC’s New York Regional Office.  “This settlement imposes additional trading limitations on McGrath in the form of a conduct-based injunction to ensure that he doesn’t commit the same transgression again.”

According to the SEC’s complaint filed in federal court in Manhattan, McGrath purchased Misonix shares in April 2009.  He later performed work on a press release in which Misonix was set to announce disappointing quarterly results.  McGrath ascertained the company’s target date to release the negative news, and sold all of his Misonix shares shortly before the press release was issued on May 11, 2009.  By doing so, McGrath avoided losses of $5,400 when Misonix’s share price subsequently dropped 22 percent.

The SEC alleges that McGrath also performed work on a press release in which Clean Diesel was announcing approximately $2 million in orders it received for certain products.  Merely minutes after finding out on May 24, 2011, that the press release was bound for issuance the following day, McGrath purchased 1,000 shares of Clean Diesel stock.  The stock price rose 95 percent upon the positive news, and McGrath sold all of his Clean Diesel shares on May 27 for illicit profits of $6,376.

The SEC’s complaint charges McGrath with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5.  Without admitting or denying the allegations, McGrath agreed to be permanently enjoined from future violations of these provisions of the federal securities laws.  The settlement is subject to court approval. 

The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Dina Levy, Daniel Marcus, and George O’Kane.  The case was supervised by Mr. Wadhwa and Sharon Binger.  The SEC appreciates the assistance of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

ALLEGED TIPPER CHARGED IN S.A.C. CAPITAL PORTFOLIO MANAGER INSIDER TRADING CASE

FROM:  SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
SEC Charges Tipper of Confidential Information to S.A.C. Capital Portfolio Manager

On July 30, 2013, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged the tipper of confidential information to a S.A.C. Capital portfolio manager who has been charged with insider trading.

The SEC amended its complaint against Richard Lee, who was charged last week, to additionally charge Sandeep Aggarwal, a sell-side analyst who tipped Lee in advance of a July 2009 public announcement about an Internet search engine partnership between Microsoft and Yahoo. Lee purchased large amounts of Yahoo stock in the S.A.C. Capital hedge fund that he managed as well as in his personal trading account on the basis of the inside information.

In a parallel action, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York today announced criminal charges against Aggarwal, who lives in India but recently returned to the U.S.

The SEC alleges that Aggarwal learned confidential details about the significant progress of the Microsoft-Yahoo negotiations from his close friend at Microsoft on July 9, 2009, and he tipped Lee with the information during a telephone call the following day. When the information was reported in the media almost a week later, Yahoo's stock price rose approximately 4 percent. S.A.C. Capital and Lee reaped substantial profits from the Yahoo shares that he purchased after speaking to Aggarwal.

According to the SEC's amended complaint filed in federal court in Manhattan, Aggarwal covered both Microsoft and Yahoo for his research firm and regularly received periodic updates from his inside source at Microsoft. Upon learning that Microsoft and Yahoo were potentially within two weeks of finalizing a deal, Aggarwal shared very specific details with Lee. Aggarwal assured him that the information came from a close friend at Microsoft who was reliable and accurate.

The SEC's amended complaint charges Aggarwal and Lee with violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. The amended complaint seeks a final judgment ordering Aggarwal and Lee to pay disgorgement of ill-gotten gains plus prejudgment interest and financial penalties, and permanently enjoining them from future violations of these provisions of the federal securities laws.

FORMER BMY EXECUTIVE SETTLES CHARGES OF INSIDER TRADING WITH SEC

FROM:  U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Former Bristol-Myers Executive Agrees to Settle Insider Trading Charges

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that the Honorable Susan D. Wigenton of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey entered a judgment approving a $324,777 settlement between the Commission and Robert D. Ramnarine, a former executive at Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., in a case that arose from allegations of insider trading in the securities of three companies that Bristol had targeted for acquisitions between 2010 and 2012.

In its action against Ramnarine, SEC v. Robert D. Ramnarine, 2:12-cv-04837 (D.N.J.), filed on August 2, 2012, the Commission alleged that Ramnarine, a former executive in Bristol's treasury department, misappropriated material nonpublic information relating to Bristol's involvement in evaluating possible acquisitions of ZymoGenetics, Inc., Pharmasset, Inc. and Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and then traded in stock options of these potential target companies' securities in personal brokerage accounts. Prior to buying Pharmasset call options, the Commission alleged that Ramnarine sought to conceal his unlawful conduct by conducting internet research, using his Bristol computer, to determine whether his option trading would be detected by regulators. In particular, the Commission alleged that Ramnarine ran internet searches using Bristol's computer network for phrases including "can stock option be traced to purchaser," "how to detect can stock option be traced to purchase inside trading," and "illegal insider trading options trace." According to the Commission's complaint, Ramnarine realized ill-gotten gains of at least $311,361 by trading stock options of ZymoGenetics, Pharmasset and Amylin in advance of announcements that those companies would be acquired.

The judgment entered in the Commission's action permanently enjoins Ramnarine from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b) and (14)(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rules 10b-5 and 14e-3 thereunder, and permanently enjoins Ramnarine from acting as an officer or director of any issuer that has any class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act. The judgment also requires Ramnarine to disgorge $311,361, plus prejudgment interest of $13,061, and requires that funds in a brokerage account controlled by Ramnarine that were frozen by previous order of the Court be transferred to the Commission. Pursuant to the judgment, the Commission may later move the Court to impose a civil penalty against Ramnarine.

The U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of New Jersey filed a parallel criminal action against Ramnarine on August 1, 2012 based on the same facts, U.S. v. Ramnarine, 3:13-cr-00387 (D.N.J.), and on June 10, 2013, Ramnarine pleaded guilty to securities fraud before the Honorable Anne E. Thompson of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. Sentencing is scheduled for September 26, 2013.

The Commission acknowledges the assistance of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of New Jersey, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Options Regulatory Surveillance Authority.

The Commission's investigation was conducted by Market Abuse Unit staff Paul T. Chryssikos, Senior Counsel, and John S. Rymas, Investigator, in the Philadelphia Regional Office. Daniel M. Hawke, Chief of the Market Abuse Unit, supervised the investigation. Regional Trial Counsel, G. Jeffrey Boujoukos and Senior Trial Counsel, John V. Donnelly, handled the litigation.

THREE CHARGED WITH INSIDER TRADING ON DOW CHEMICAL ROHM & HASS ACQUISITION

FROM: U.S. SECURITES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SEC Charges Three with Insider Trading On Confidential Acquisition Negotiations Between Rohm & Haas and Dow


On July 1, 2013, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it charged a former officer of The Dow Chemical Company (Dow), his long-time friend, and a broker with insider trading that generated more than $1 million in illicit profits based on confidential information ahead of Dow's acquisition of Rohm & Haas Co. (Rohm).


The SEC's complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, charges Mack D. Murrell, of Saginaw, Michigan, David A. Teekell, of Tomball, Texas, and Charles W. Adams, of Conroe, Texas with violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The complaint also names as a relief defendant Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. (Raymond James) for the purpose of recovering illegal profits in its firm account. Teekell has agreed to settle the SEC's charges and pay approximately $1.1 million in disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and a civil penalty.

The SEC's complaint alleges that Murrell, who was the Vice President of Information Systems for Dow, obtained confidential details about the acquisition of Rohm from his then live-in girlfriend, now wife, who was the administrative assistant to Dow's Chief Financial Officer at the time. Murrell's girlfriend knew about and worked on the pending acquisition. The complaint alleges that the day after learning from his girlfriend of a special Board meeting at which the Rohm acquisition was discussed, Murrell tipped his long-time friend Teekell during a telephone call. Immediately following the telephone call, Teekell called Adams, his broker at Raymond James, and tipped him.

The complaint further alleges that the next business day after learning of the pending acquisition, Teekell and Adams began purchasing common stock and call options in Rohm. In addition to purchasing call options in his own account, Adams purchased stock in two discretionary customer accounts. Teekell's and Adams' purchases continued until the day before the acquisition announcement on July 10, 2008, when the price of Rohm stock jumped 64 percent. Teekell made an illicit profit of $534,526 and Adams and his discretionary customers made illicit profits of $107,043 through the insider trading. Raymond James made illicit profits of $373,497 when Teekell and Adams decided not to keep certain Rohm options that Adams had purchased in Teekell's account.

A call option is a security that derives its value from the underlying common stock of the issuer and gives the purchaser the right to buy the underlying stock at a specific price within a specified period of time. Typically, investors will purchase call options when they believe the price of the stock of the underlying securities is going up. Teekell and Adams invested so heavily in two series of Rohm call options on July 9, 2008 that their investments accounted for over 86 percent and 64 percent of the total options volume for these series on that day.

The complaint seeks a final judgment ordering disgorgement of ill-gotten gains together with prejudgment interest from the defendants and the relief defendant, and permanent injunctions and penalties against the defendants.

Teekell has consented, without admitting or denying the SEC's allegations, to the entry of a final judgment permanently enjoining him from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. Teekell has agreed to pay $534,526 in disgorgement, $105,346 in prejudgment interest, and a penalty of $534,526. The settlement is subject to court approval.

The SEC's investigation was conducted by Philadelphia Regional Office enforcement staff Kingdon Kase and Suzanne C. Abt. The SEC's litigation will be led by John V. Donnelly and G. Jeffrey Boujoukos






 

WEALTH MANAGEMENT COMPANY CHARGED WITH INSIDER TRADING

FROM: U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SEC Files Insider Trading Charges Against Whittier Trust and Fund Manager


On June 7, 2013, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged a South Pasadena, Calif.-based wealth management company and a former fund manager with insider trading on non-public information about technology companies. The charges arise from the agency's ongoing investigation into expert networks and hedge fund trading.


The SEC alleges that Whittier Trust Company and fund manager Victor Dosti of San Marino, California, participated in an insider trading scheme involving the securities of Dell, Nvidia Corporation, and Wind River Systems. Dosti generated profits and avoided losses for funds he managed at Whittier Trust by trading on confidential information that he obtained from Danny Kuo, a Whittier Trust fund manager who Dosti supervised. Kuo was charged by the SEC in January 2012 and is currently cooperating with the investigation.

Whittier Trust and Dosti agreed to pay nearly $1.7 million to settle the charges.

According to the SEC's complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, Dosti used non-public information obtained from employees at Dell and Nvidia to trade in advance of five quarterly earnings announcements in 2008, 2009 and 2010. Dosti reaped profits and avoided losses of more than $475,000 for Whittier Trust funds. Dosti also made $247,000 in illicit profits for Whittier Trust funds by trading Wind River stock based upon detailed information that Kuo obtained from an Intel employee about Intel's confidential negotiations to acquire Wind River in 2009.

The SEC's complaint charges Whittier Trust and Dosti with violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5, and Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933. Whittier Trust agreed to pay disgorgement of $724,051.62 plus prejudgment interest of $75,296.00 and a penalty of $724,051.62. Dosti agreed to pay disgorgement of $77,900.00 plus prejudgment interest of $2,951.43, and a penalty of $77,900.00. The settlements are subject to court approval and would permanently enjoin Whittier Trust and Dosti from future violations of the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws. Whittier Trust and Dosti neither admit nor deny the SEC's charges. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

SEC CHARGES TORONTO INVESTMENT BANKER WITH INSIDER TRADING

FROM: U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C., April 16, 2013 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged an investment banker in Toronto with insider trading by using information that he obtained through his job of pitching investment ideas to the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB).

The SEC alleges that Richard Bruce Moore, who worked at the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC), was attempting to obtain a role in a pending acquisition when he learned facts that allowed him to conclude that U.K.-based engineering and manufacturing company Tomkins plc was the CPPIB’s target. Moore misappropriated the information by purchasing Tomkins American Depositary Receipts (ADRs), which trade on the New York Stock Exchange, during the weeks leading up to the acquisition. After the acquisition offer was announced, the closing price of Tomkins ADRs rose 27 percent, and Moore made more than $163,000 in illicit profits.

Moore has agreed to settle the SEC’s charges by paying more than $340,000. The Ontario Securities Commission today announced a related action against Moore for insider trading in Tomkins common stock.

"Moore spent approximately one-third of his total net worth on purchases of Tomkins securities based on information he learned in the course of his employment," said Scott W. Friestad, Associate Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement. "In today’s interconnected markets, the cooperative relationships among securities regulators mean that those who choose to engage in international insider trading should expect to face consequences across the globe."

According to the SEC’s complaint filed in federal court in Manhattan, the CPPIB was one of Moore’s top clients at CIBC in 2010. His primary contact was a CPPIB managing director who was responsible for taking public companies private. Through Moore’s interactions with the CPPIB, he learned that the Board was working on a large transaction in the United Kingdom. He pieced together nonpublic information to conclude that the Board was going to make an offer to acquire Tomkins.

The SEC alleges that Moore used an account in the Channel Islands to purchase 51,350 Tomkins ADRs on the New York Stock Exchange on June 28, 2010. He also purchased a large number of Tomkins common shares on the London Stock Exchange. The CPPIB and a Canadian private equity firm announced the acquisition offer for Tomkins on July 19, 2010.

The SEC’s complaint charges Moore with violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. In the settlement, which is subject to court approval, Moore agreed to pay $163,293 in disgorgement, $14,905 in prejudgment interest, and a $163,293 penalty. Moore also agreed to an SEC order that will bar him from the securities industry or participating in a penny stock offering.

The SEC’s investigation was conducted by David Frohlich and Matthew L. Skidmore. The SEC appreciates the cooperation and assistance of the Ontario Securities Commission, Jersey Financial Services Commission, and Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

SEC CHARGES MAN WITH INSIDER TRADING WHILE MANAGING HEDGE FUNDS

FROM: U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C., March 21, 2013 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged Rajarengan "Rengan" Rajaratnam for his role in the massive insider trading scheme spearheaded by his older brother Raj Rajaratnam and hedge fund advisory firm Galleon Management.

The SEC alleges that from 2006 to 2008, Rengan Rajaratnam repeatedly received inside information from his brother and reaped more than $3 million in illicit gains for himself and hedge funds that he managed at Galleon and Sedna Capital Management, a hedge fund advisory firm that he co-founded. In addition to illegally trading on inside tips, Rengan Rajaratnam was an active participant in his brother’s scheme to cultivate highly placed sources and extract confidential information for an unfair advantage over other traders.

"Our complaint against Rengan Rajaratnam tells a sad tale of a man who followed his brother down an illegal path of greed to its inevitable conclusion," said George S. Canellos, Acting Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement.

Sanjay Wadhwa, Senior Associate Director of the SEC’s New York Regional Office, added, "Rengan Rajaratnam profited handsomely from his brother’s insider trading activities, and he may have believed he wouldn’t have to pay a price for his involvement. But now he is learning the true cost of his participation in the most expansive insider trading scheme ever perpetrated."

In a parallel action, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York today announced criminal charges against Rengan Rajaratnam.

According to the SEC’s complaint filed in federal court in Manhattan, Rengan Rajaratnam repeatedly received valuable insider tips from his brother that he used for illegal trading in the securities of Polycom, Hilton Hotels, Clearwire Corporation, Akamai Technologies, and AMD. For example, in July 2007, he made substantial profits trading Hilton stock in his personal account based on a timely insider trading tip from Raj Rajaratnam that Hilton was about to be taken private. Rengan Rajaratnam quickly loaded up on Hilton stock, and the price of Hilton shares jumped more than 25 percent after the news became public. Rengan Rajaratnam cashed in his recently acquired position for an illicit profit of more than $675,000.

According to the SEC’s complaint, after Raj Rajaratnam tipped him about an upcoming transaction involving Clearwire Corporation in March 2008, Rengan Rajaratnam complained to his brother that certain nonpublic information they had used to begin accumulating a position in Clearwire stock was about to be reported by the media before they could establish a larger position. Rengan Rajaratnam nevertheless profited by more than $100,000 in his personal brokerage account and more than $230,000 for Galleon hedge funds based on trades in Clearwire securities.

The SEC’s complaint charges Rengan Rajaratnam with violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. The complaint seeks a final judgment permanently enjoining Rajaratnam from future violations of these provisions of the federal securities laws, ordering him to disgorge his ill-gotten gains plus prejudgment interest, and ordering him to pay financial penalties.

The SEC’s investigation, which is continuing, has been conducted by John Henderson and Joseph Sansone — members of the SEC’s Market Abuse Unit in New York — and Matthew Watkins, Diego Brucculeri, and James D’Avino of the New York Regional Office. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

The SEC has now charged 33 defendants in its Galleon-related enforcement actions, which have exposed widespread and repeated insider trading at numerous hedge funds and by other traders, investment professionals, and corporate insiders located throughout the country. The insider trading occurred in the securities of more than 15 companies for illicit gains totaling more than $96 million.

ASSET FREEZE ANNOUNCED BECAUSE OF SUSPICIOUS TRADING AHEAD OF H.J. HEINZ ACQUISITION

FROM: U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C., Feb. 15, 2013 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today obtained an emergency court order to freeze assets in a Zurich, Switzerland-based trading account that was used to reap more than $1.7 million from trading in advance of yesterday’s public announcement about the acquisition of H.J. Heinz Company.

The SEC’s immediate action ensures that potentially illegal profits cannot be siphoned out of this account while the agency’s investigation of the suspicious trading continues.

In a complaint filed in federal court in Manhattan, the SEC alleges that prior to any public awareness that Berkshire Hathaway and 3G Capital had agreed to acquire H.J. Heinz Company in a deal valued at $28 billion, unknown traders took risky bets that Heinz’s stock price would increase. The traders purchased call options the very day before the public announcement. After the announcement, Heinz’s stock rose nearly 20 percent and trading volume increased more than 1,700 percent from the prior day, placing these traders in a position to profit substantially.

"Irregular and highly suspicious options trading immediately in front of a merger or acquisition announcement is a serious red flag that traders may be improperly acting on confidential nonpublic information," said Daniel M. Hawke, Chief of the Division of Enforcement’s Market Abuse Unit.

Sanjay Wadhwa, Senior Associate Director of the SEC’s New York Regional Office, added, "Despite the obvious logistical challenges of investigating trades involving offshore accounts, we moved swiftly to locate and freeze the assets of these suspicious traders, who now have to make an appearance in court to explain their trading if they want their assets unfrozen."

The SEC alleges that the unknown traders were in possession of material nonpublic information about the impending acquisition when they purchased out-of-the-money Heinz call options the day before the announcement. The timing and size of the trades were highly suspicious because the account through which the traders purchased the options had no history of trading Heinz securities in the last six months. Overall trading activity in Heinz call options several days before the announcement had been minimal.

The emergency court order obtained by the SEC freezes the traders’ assets and prohibits them from destroying any evidence. The SEC’s complaint charges the unknown traders with violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. In addition to the emergency relief, the SEC is seeking a final judgment ordering the traders to disgorge their ill-gotten gains with interest, pay financial penalties, and be permanently barred from future violations.

The SEC’s expedited investigation is being conducted by Market Abuse Unit members Megan Bergstrom, David S. Brown, and Diana Tani in the Los Angeles Regional Office with substantial assistance from Charles Riely, Market Abuse Unit member in the New York Regional Office who will handle the SEC’s litigation. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the Options Regulatory Surveillance Authority (ORSA).

ALLEGED INSIDER TRADING VIA INFORMATION GAINED FROM LAWYER WIFE

FROM: U.S. SECURITEIS AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged a Houston man with insider trading ahead of the acquisition of Santa Clara-based National Semiconductor Corporation based on confidential details that he gleaned from his wife, a partner at a large law firm that was consulted on the deal.

The SEC alleges that James Balchan immediately bought shares of National Semiconductor stock after his wife informed him that a social event for the company's general counsel had been cancelled because he was busy working on an imminent merger. Balchan and his wife were among the invitees to the event. Balchan made nearly $30,000 in illicit profits when he sold his shares after Texas Instruments publicly announced its acquisition of National Semiconductor and the stock price jumped more than 75 percent.

Balchan agreed to pay nearly $60,000 to settle the SEC's charges.

According to the SEC's complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, another partner at the firm where Balchan's wife worked began organizing informal client "wine and dine" events for the first weekend of April 2011 in honor of National Semiconductor's general counsel. The partner was close to Balchan's wife and socially acquainted with Balchan. The partner invited both of them to the weekend events and told them that National Semiconductor's general counsel would be in attendance.

According to the SEC's complaint, the partner called National Semiconductor's general counsel a few days before the weekend and was informed that he was working on the company's impending acquisition. The general counsel sought the law firm's advice in dealing with certain regulatory issues arising from the deal. He also informed the partner that, in light of the acquisition, he would be unable to attend the event that coming weekend. When the law partner advised Balchan's wife that National Semiconductor's general counsel cancelled the client weekend because of the imminent acquisition, she shared the information with Balchan in confidence later that night in the context of discussing their weekend plans.

The SEC alleges that the very next morning, Balchan misappropriated the confidential information he learned about the acquisition and purchased 2,000 National Semiconductor shares. A few days later, Balchan purchased 1,000 shares. Texas Instruments issued a press release on April 4 announcing its acquisition of National Semiconductor. Each of Balchan's National Semiconductor trades was based on inside information in violation of duties of trust and confidence that he owed to his wife. Balchan was aware that his wife owed a duty of trust or confidence to her law firm and its clients.

The SEC's complaint charges Balchan with violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. Balchan has settled the SEC's charges without admitting or denying the allegations. He has agreed to the entry of a judgment enjoining him from future violations of relevant provisions of the Exchange Act, and to pay disgorgement and prejudgment interest of $30,615.18, and an additional penalty equal to his profits of $29,052.39.

The SEC's investigation was conducted by Jennifer J. Lee and Jina L. Choi of the San Francisco Regional Office. The SEC acknowledges the assistance of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) in this matter.

ADDITIONAL CHARGES BROUGHT AGAINST TWO BROKERS IN INSIDER TRADING CASE INVOLVING IBM ACQUISITION OF SPSSI NC..

FROM: U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C., Dec. 26, 2012 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced additional charges in an insider trading case against two brokers who traded on nonpublic information ahead of IBM Corporation’s acquisition of SPSS Inc.

In an amended complaint filed in federal court in Manhattan, the SEC is now charging research analyst Trent Martin, who was the brokers’ source of confidential information in an insider trading scheme that yielded more than $1 million in illicit profits. Martin worked at a brokerage firm in Connecticut and specialized in Australian equity investments, and he learned nonpublic information about the impending IBM-SPSS transaction from an attorney friend who was working on the deal. Rather than maintaining the confidence of the information, Martin used the information for his own benefit, purchasing SPSS securities and subsequently tipping his roommate Thomas C. Conradt, who traded and tipped his friend and fellow retail broker David J. Weishaus. Martin was specifically named as their source in instant messages between Conradt and Weishaus about their illegal trading.

The SEC charged Conradt and Weishaus with insider trading on November 29. Martin, who fled the U.S. to Australia soon after learning about the SEC’s investigation, currently lives in Hong Kong.

"Martin is a licensed professional who knowingly disregarded insider trading laws to enrich himself, and then fled the United States when he learned of our investigation," said Daniel M. Hawke, Director of the SEC’s Philadelphia Regional Office. "Martin could run but he could not hide, as the long arm of the SEC will extend to those who flee the United States hoping to avoid the consequences of their unlawful conduct."

The SEC alleges that Martin’s attorney friend expected him to maintain information in confidence and refrain from illegal trading or disclosing it to others. The attorney sought moral support, reassurance, and advice when he privately told Martin about his new assignment working on the IBM-SPSS acquisition. The lawyer disclosed to Martin such details as the anticipated transaction price and the identities of the acquiring and target companies while he was describing the magnitude of the assignment.

According to the SEC’s complaint, Martin attempted to purchase SPSS common stock on the very first business day after learning the nonpublic information from his friend. His first three orders were cancelled because he did not have sufficient funds in the account to make the purchases, but he later wired $50,000 from his checking account into his brokerage account to purchase SPSS shares.

The SEC’s complaint alleges that Martin, Conradt and Weishaus violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. The SEC is seeking disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest and financial penalties, and a permanent injunction against the brokers.

The SEC’s investigation, which is continuing, is being conducted by Mary P. Hansen, A. Kristina Littman, and John S. Rymas in the SEC’s Philadelphia Regional Office. G. Jeffrey Boujoukos and Catherine E. Pappas in the Philadelphia office are handling the litigation.

The SEC acknowledges the assistance of the Options Regulatory Surveillance Authority (ORSA), the New Zealand Securities Commission, and the Australia Securities and Investments Commission. The SEC also acknowledges the assistance of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

INSURANCE COMPANY CEO CHARGED WITH INSIDER TRADING

FROM: U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SEC Charges Denver-Based Insurance Executive With Insider Trading
On October 26, 2012, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged an insurance company CEO with insider trading based on confidential information he obtained in advance of a private investment firm acquiring a significant stake in a Denver-based oil and gas company.

The SEC alleges that Michael Van Gilder learned from a Delta Petroleum Corporation insider that Beverly Hills-based Tracinda – which has previously owned large portions of companies such as MGM Resorts International, General Motors, and Ford Motor Company – was planning to acquire a 35 percent stake in Delta Petroleum for $684 million. Van Gilder subsequently purchased Delta Petroleum stock and highly speculative options contracts. He tipped several others, encouraging them to do the same, including a pair of relatives via an e-mail with the subject line "Xmas present." After Tracinda's investment was publicly announced, Delta Petroleum's stock price shot up by almost 20 percent. Van Gilder and his tippees made more than $161,000 in illegal trading profits.

The U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Colorado today announced a parallel criminal action against Van Gilder.

According to the SEC's complaint filed in federal court in Denver, Van Gilder is the CEO of Van Gilder Insurance Company. He obtained the confidential information about Tracinda's proposed investment and loaded up on Delta Petroleum stock and options in November and December 2007. He then tipped his broker, a co-worker, and relatives.

The SEC alleges that a mere two minutes after speaking to his source at Delta Petroleum on December 22, Van Gilder e-mailed two relatives with the "Xmas present" subject line and stated, "my present (just kidding) is that I can't stress enough the opportunity right now to buy Delta Petroleum." That same day, Van Gilder contacted his broker and arranged to purchase more Delta stock and options for himself. Following the public announcement, Van Gilder reaped approximately $109,000 in illegal profits and his broker, co-worker, and a relative made approximately $52,000.

The SEC's complaint charges Van Gilder with violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5, and seeks a final judgment ordering him to disgorge his and his tippees' ill-gotten gains and pay prejudgment interest and a financial penalty, and permanently enjoining him from future violations of these provisions of the federal securities laws.

BROKER GETS ASSETS FROZEN IN BK INSIDER TRADING CASE

FROM: U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C., Sept. 20, 2012 – The Securities and Exchange Commission today obtained an emergency court order to freeze the assets of a stockbroker who used nonpublic information from a customer and engaged in insider trading ahead of Burger King’s announcement that it was being acquired by a New York private equity firm.

The SEC alleges that Waldyr Da Silva Prado Neto, a citizen of Brazil who was working for Wells Fargo in Miami, learned about the impending acquisition from a brokerage customer who invested at least $50 million in a fund managed by private equity firm 3G Capital Partners Ltd. and used to acquire Burger King in 2010. Prado misused the confidential information to illegally trade in Burger King stock for $175,000 in illicit profits, and he tipped others living in Brazil and elsewhere who also traded on the nonpublic information.

The SEC obtained the asset freeze in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The agency took the emergency action to prevent Prado from transferring his assets outside of U.S. jurisdiction. Prado recently abandoned his most current job at Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, put his Miami home up for sale, and began transferring all of his assets out of the country.

"Prado’s e-mails and other communications may have been sent from Brazil and may have been in Portuguese, but our commitment to prosecute illegal insider trading in U.S. markets knows no geographic or language barrier," said Sanjay Wadhwa, Deputy Chief of the SEC Enforcement Division’s Market Abuse Unit and Associate Director of the New York Regional Office.

According to the SEC’s complaint, Prado’s insider trading in Burger King stock occurred from May 17 to Sept. 1, 2010. At the time, Prado was the representative on the account used by the customer to transfer his investment to 3G Capital. The customer had been with Prado for more than 10 years and often shared his confidential financial information with the understanding that it was to remain confidential. Prado had repeated contact with the customer by phone and e-mail as well as in person in Brazil during the time period that Prado traded Burger King securities.

The SEC alleges that Prado began his illegal trading while on a business trip to Brazil, during which he sent an e-mail to a friend that – translated from Portuguese – read, "I’m in Brazil with information that cannot be sent by email. You can’t miss it…." Prado later told his friend on a phone call that night that he heard 3G Capital was going to take Burger King private. The friend, a hedge fund manager in Miami, warned Prado that he should not trade on this information and should not encourage any of his customers to trade either.

According to the SEC’s complaint, Prado went on to tip at least four of his customers who eventually traded in Burger King stock based on nonpublic information about the impending acquisition. For example, just minutes after Prado sent the May 17 e-mail to his friend in Miami, he sent an e-mail to one of those customers which, again translated from Portuguese, read, " … if you are around call me at the hotel … I have some info…You have to hear this." A 10-minute phone conversation followed, and the customer purchased out-of-the-money Burger King call options during the next two days. In August 2010 Prado was on another business trip to Brazil, the same customer sent Prado an e-mail which translated to, "[i]s the sandwich deal going to happen?" Prado replied, "Vai sim," which means, "Yes it’s going to happen." He continued, "[e]verything is 100% under control. I was embarrassed to ask about timing. The last ‘vol’ got in the way." Following these e-mails, the customer – identified as Tippee A in the SEC’s complaint – made additional purchases in Burger King call options. The customer’s total insider trading profits amounted to more than $1.68 million.

The SEC’s complaint against Prado seeks a permanent injunction from violations of Sections 10(b) and 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5 and 14e-3 thereunder, disgorgement with prejudgment interest and monetary penalties.

The SEC’s investigation, which is continuing, has been conducted by Megan Bergstrom, David Brown, and Diana Tani in Los Angeles, and Charles D. Riely in New York, who are members of the SEC Enforcement Division’s Market Abuse Unit. The investigation was supervised by Unit Chief Daniel M. Hawke and Deputy Chief Sanjay Wadhwa. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the Comissão de Valores Mobliliários (Securities and Exchange Commission of Brazil), Options Regulatory Surveillance Authority, and Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).

SEC CHARGES 8 INDIVIDUALS WITH INSIDER TRADING BASED ON ACCOUNTANTS TIP

FROM:  U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C., Aug. 28, 2012 – The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged eight individuals living in the Griffin, Ga., area for participating in an insider trading ring that generated more than $500,000 in illegal profits based on nonpublic information about an upcoming company merger.

The SEC alleges that local accountant Thomas D. Melvin, Jr. exploited confidential information from a client who was on the board of directors at Chattem Inc., a Tennessee-based pharmaceutical company known for such over-the-counter products as Allegra, Gold Bond, and Icy Hot. In late 2009, after Chattem’s board was informed that French pharmaceutical manufacturer Sanofi-Aventis Inc. made a tender offer to purchase the company, Melvin’s client sought his professional advice on the financial impact of his Chattem stock options being involuntarily exercised due to a change in control of the company. Melvin breached his duty of confidentiality to the client and proceeded to tip four of his friends and associates about the likely increase in the company’s stock price as a result of the impending transaction. Those individuals then knowingly traded on the confidential information ahead of the public announcement of the merger, and some even tipped others who traded illegally as well.

Four of the eight men agreed to settle the SEC’s charges and pay back all of their ill-gotten gains plus interest and penalties for a combined total of approximately $155,000.

“It is particularly troubling when professionals like Melvin violate their professional obligations and breach a client’s trust by misusing confidential information,” said William P. Hicks, Associate Director for Enforcement in the SEC’s Atlanta Regional Office. “These traders similarly jeopardized their reputations or careers by trading on information that was off-limits.”

According to the SEC’s complaint filed in federal court in Atlanta, the Chattem board member made clear to Melvin during their private conversations and meetings that the topic of discussion was confidential. The board member shared the likely increase in stock price ($20 to $25 per share) from the pending transaction as well as its potential timing. Nevertheless, Melvin illegally tipped three friends and a partner at his accounting firm Melvin, Rooks, and Howell PC. Each of the four tippees traded on the nonpublic information:

• C. Roan Berry – Melvin’s friend who lives in Jackson, Ga.
• Michael S. Cain – Melvin’s friend who lives in Griffin, Ga.
• Joel C. Jinks – Melvin’s friend who lives in Griffin, Ga., and was a one-time candidate for local sheriff.
• R. Jeffrey Rooks – Melvin’s longtime accounting partner who lives in Griffin, Ga.

The SEC alleges that Berry tipped his friend and neighbor in Jackson, Ashley J. Coots, who in turn tipped his friend and former co-worker Casey D. Jackson, who lives in Atlanta.

The SEC alleges that Cain, who works at a brokerage firm, tipped his friend Peter C. Doffing, who lives Milner, Ga. and purchased out-of-the-money call options based on the nonpublic information.

The four traders settling the SEC’s charges agreed to pay back all of their ill-gotten gains plus interest and penalties:

• Berry agreed to pay disgorgement of $55,091.51, prejudgment interest of $4,860.37, and a penalty of $55,091.51.
• Coots agreed to pay disgorgement of $17,360.43, prejudgment interest of $1,565.48, and a penalty of $13,231.80.
• Jackson agreed to pay disgorgement of $2,369.78, prejudgment interest of $221.93, and a penalty of $1,184.89.
• Rooks agreed to pay disgorgement of $18,482.14, prejudgment interest of $1,432.68, and a penalty of $4,620.54. Rooks also will be prohibited from appearing or practicing before the SEC as an accountant under SEC Rule of Practice 102(e). The terms of Rooks’ settlement reflect credit given to him for his cooperation and substantial assistance to the investigation.

Berry, Coots, Rooks agreed to be permanently enjoined from violating Sections 10(b) and 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5 and 14e-3. Jackson agreed to be permanently enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. All four neither admit nor deny the allegations, and their settlements are subject to court approval.

The SEC will proceed with its litigation against Melvin, Cain, Doffing, and Jinks.

The SEC’s investigation was conducted in its Atlanta Regional Office by Staff Attorney William S. Dixon and Senior Trial Counsel Kristin Wilhelm under the supervision of Assistant Regional Director Aaron W. Lipson. Ms. Wilhelm will lead the ongoing litigation.

The SEC thanks the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) for their assistance provided in this matter.

ALLEGED INSIDER TRADING USING NONPUBLIC INFORMATION

FROM:  U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
SEC Charges Eric Martin, former Vice President of Investor Relations of Carter’s Inc. with Insider Trading
On August 23, 2012, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a civil injunctive action against Eric Martin, a 42 year old resident of Roswell, Georgia. The Commission alleges that Martin, who served from 2003 through March 2009 as the Director and, later, Vice President of Investor Relations for Carter’s Inc., repeatedly traded Carter’s shares during blackout periods while in possession of material, nonpublic information regarding the company’s financial results. According to the complaint, Martin obtained Carter’s preliminary financial results while preparing Carter’s senior management for Carter’s quarterly earnings calls, and then bought or sold Carter’s stock depending on whether the preliminary information here received was positive or negative. As the result of his illegal trading, Martin realized profits and avoided losses in excess of $170,000.

The Commission’s complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, charges Martin with violating the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws during at least 8 quarters between January 2007 and April 2009 in advance of the company’s quarterly earnings releases. The Commission seeks a permanent injunction, disgorgement with prejudgment interest and civil monetary penalties Act against Defendant Martin and seeks disgorgement with prejudgment interest from his wife, Relief Defendant Robin Martin, for trading Martin did through her accounts.

SEC CHARGES EQUITY RESEARCHER WITH INSIDER TRADING

FROM:  U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C., June 26, 2012 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged Tai Nguyen, the owner of the California-based equity research firm Insight Research, with insider trading. The charges stem from the SEC’s ongoing investigation of insider trading involving so-called “expert networks” that provide specialized information to investment firms.

The SEC alleges that from 2006 through 2009, Nguyen frequently traded in the securities of Abaxis, Inc. based on inside information he received from a close relative employed at Abaxis. Nguyen repeatedly traded for himself in advance of the company’s quarterly earnings announcements while in possession of key data in those announcements, reaping tens of thousands of dollars in illicit profits. Nguyen also passed that same information to hedge fund clients of Insight Research, who used the inside information to make millions of dollars in profits from trading Abaxis securities.

“Nguyen claimed expertise in researching and analyzing technology companies, but his special edge was his willingness to break the law,” said Sanjay Wadhwa, Associate Director of the SEC’s New York Regional Office and Deputy Chief of the Market Abuse Unit. “Like many other so-called ‘experts’ who trafficked in inside information, Nguyen now finds himself the subject of an enforcement action.”

The SEC has charged 23 defendants in enforcement actions arising out of its expert networks investigation, which has uncovered widespread insider trading at several hedge funds and other investment advisory firms. The insider trading alleged by the SEC has yielded illicit gains of more than $117 million, chiefly in shares of technology companies, including Apple, Dell, Fairchild Semiconductor, and Marvell Technology.

According to the SEC’s complaint, filed in federal court in Manhattan, Nguyen regularly obtained material nonpublic information about Abaxis Inc.’s quarterly earnings — including revenues, gross profit margins and earnings per share — from a relative who worked in Abaxis’s finance department. Nguyen used the information to trade Abaxis securities in his own account and reaped approximately $145,000 in illicit trading profits from 2006 through 2009.

In addition to trading in his own account, the SEC alleges that Nguyen passed the inside information to New York-based Barai Capital Management and Boston-based Sonar Capital Management, both of which were clients of Nguyen’s firm, Insight Research. The two hedge fund managers — who collectively were paying Insight Research tens of thousands of dollars each month — traded Abaxis securities based on the inside information that Nguyen provided and reaped more than $7.2 million in illicit gains for their hedge funds.

The SEC’s complaint charges Nguyen with violating the anti-fraud provisions of U.S. securities laws and seeks a final judgment ordering him to disgorge his ill-gotten gains, with interest, and pay financial penalties, and permanently barring him from future violations.

The SEC’s investigation is continuing. Daniel Marcus and Joseph Sansone, members of the SEC’s Market Abuse Unit in New York, conducted the investigation, along with Matthew Watkins, Neil Hendelman, Diego Brucculeri, and James D’Avino of the New York Regional Office. The SEC thanks the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York and the Federal Bureau of Investigation for their assistance in the matter.

SEC CHARGES THREE FORMER CONSOL ENERGY, INC. EMPLOYEES WITH ILLEGAL TRADING IN ADVANCE OF AN ACQUISITION ANNOUNCEMENT

FROM:  U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
June 1, 2012
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that on June 1, 2012, it filed a civil action against three former employees of CONSOL Energy, Inc. (“CONSOL”) for illegal insider trading in CONSOL securities in advance of the company’s public announcement, on March 15, 2010, that it entered into an agreement to acquire the Appalachian Exploration and Production business of Dominion Resources, Inc. (“Dominion”). The Commission alleges that on March 9, 2010, both Charles E. Mazur Jr., CONSOL’s former Director of Corporate Strategy, and Joseph A. Cerenzia, CONSOL’s former Director of Public Relations, received a confidential email stating that the acquisition of Dominion was going to be announced prior to the opening of the market on March 15, 2010. Both individuals traded CONSOL securities after learning of the pending acquisition announcement. James S. Poland, CONSOL’s former General Manager of Engineering, conducted an environmental survey in connection with the of the Dominion acquisition. Poland also traded CONSOL stock after receiving nonpublic information about the acquisition and when it would be announced.

The Commission’s complaint alleges that Mazur violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Rules 10b-5(a) and (c) thereunder, and alleges that Poland and Cerenzia violated of Sections 17(a)(1) and (3) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”), Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5(a) and (c) thereunder, and seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement, prejudgment interest and civil penalties.

The defendants agreed to settle the Commission’s charges, without admitting or denying the allegations in the Commission’s complaint. Under the settlements, the defendants consented to Final Judgments that will permanently enjoin Mazur from violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder; and permanently enjoin Poland and Cerenzia from violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. Mazur agreed to pay approximately $97,171 in disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil penalties. Poland agreed to pay approximately $19,600 in disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil penalties. Cerenzia agreed to pay approximately $15,453 in disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil penalties. The settlements are subject to court approval.

SEC CHARGES MOVIE PRODUCER AND RING OF RELATIVES AND BUSINESS PARTNERS WITH INSIDER TRADING

FROM:  SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
May 8, 2012
The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged a Hollywood movie producer along with his brother, cousin, and three others in his circle of friends and business partners with insider trading in the stock of a company for which he served on the board of directors.

The SEC alleges that Mohammed Mark Amin, prior to a company board meeting, learned confidential information about expanding business opportunities for DuPont Fabros Technology Inc., which develops and manages highly-specialized and secure facilities that maintain large computer servers for technology companies through long-term leases with them. The SEC alleges that Amin tipped his brother Robert Reza Amin, cousin Michael Mahmood Amin, and long-time friend and business manager Sam Saeed Pirnazar with nonpublic details about three new leases that DuPont Fabros was negotiating and three loans it was obtaining to develop new facilities.  The SEC also alleges that the three illegally traded on the basis of that inside information.  Reza Amin went on to tip his friends and business associates Mary Coley and Ali Tashakori, who also illegally traded.  Together they made more than $618,000 in insider trading profits when DuPont Fabros stock rose 36 percent after the company issued an earnings release highlighting the development of these new facilities.
Mark Amin and the five others agreed to settle the SEC’s charges by collectively paying nearly $2 million.

According to the SEC’s complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Mark Amin is a motion picture executive with his own production company.  He lives in Los Angeles and is credited as the producer or executive producer for more than 75 Hollywood movies including Frida,Eve’s Bayou, and four movies in the Leprechaun series.  In 2007, Amin began serving on the board of directors at DuPont Fabros, a real estate investment trust (REIT) whose common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange.  DuPont Fabros develops and operates wholesale data centers that maintain computer servers for such companies as Microsoft, Facebook, and Google. Amin resigned from the board in February 2011.

The SEC alleges that Mark Amin first learned nonpublic information about new leases and loans pending for DuPont Fabros during a board meeting in December 2008, and he further discussed their status in a phone conversation with the company’s CEO on Jan. 7, 2009.  According to the SEC’s complaint, that same day, Mark Amin tipped his cousin Michael Amin of Los Angeles and his friend and business manager Pirnazar of Manhattan Beach, Calif.  The SEC alleges that in fact, Mark Amin initially asked Michael to lend him money and discussed Michael’s purchasing DuPont Fabros stock for both of them in Michael’s name.

On February 4, Mark Amin received materials for a special board meeting to approve the three new loans.  The SEC alleges that the next morning, he tipped this inside information to his brother Reza Amin of Los Angeles, who began buying DuPont Fabros stock just 17 minutes after receiving the tip.  The board approved the three new loans later that day.
According to the SEC’s complaint, Reza Amin tipped Coley, a British citizen who lives in Los Angeles with whom he has a daughter.  They are also business partners in a small chain of video stores.  On February 6, he brought Coley into the local E*Trade branch office where he maintained a brokerage account so she could open a new brokerage account to purchase DuPont Fabros shares.  The SEC alleges that Reza Amin also tipped his friend Tashakori, who lives in Rolling Hills, Calif. and as a self-employed licensed general contractor was engaged in various construction projects for both Mark and Reza Amin.  The SEC also alleges that Tashakori purchased DuPont Fabros stock based on Reza Amin’s tip.

According to the SEC’s complaint, DuPont Fabros issued its 2008 earnings release after the market closed on February 11, 2009, and highlighted that it had obtained the three new loans and entered into the three new leases.  The SEC alleges that from January 8 to February 10, Michael Amin had purchased 145,000 DuPont Fabros shares that yielded him $318,646 in insider trading profits when the stock price soared upon news of the earnings release.  The SEC also alleges that Pirnazar purchased 10,500 shares and made $19,915 in illicit profits.  From February 5 to February 11, Reza Amin purchased 214,600 DuPont Fabros shares for an eventual illegal profit of $241,767.  Coley purchased 20,050 shares and realized insider trading profits of $23,690.  Tashakori purchased 15,000 shares and profited $14,479.

The SEC’s complaint charges the Amins, Pirnazar, Coley, and Tashakori with violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5(a) and (c) thereunder.  They have agreed to collectively pay disgorgement of $618,497, prejudgment interest of $78,000, and penalties totaling $1,236,994.  They also have agreed to the entry of a final judgment permanently enjoining them from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5.  Mark Amin has additionally agreed to a bar from serving as an officer or director of a public company for 10 years.  The settlement is subject to court approval.

The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Los Angeles Regional Office enforcement attorney John Britt.  The SEC thanks the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) for its assistance in this matter.

PARALEGAL AND DAD CHARGED WITH INSIDER TRADING

FROM:  U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SEC Charges Montana-Based Paralegal and Her Father in Insider Trading Scheme
Washington, D.C., May 7, 2012 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged a former paralegal at a Kalispell, Mont.-based semiconductor company and her father with insider trading on confidential information about the 2009 acquisition of the company.

The SEC alleges that Angela Milliard wired money to her boyfriend’s brokerage account so she could illegally trade on nonpublic details she learned while working as a legal assistant on Semitool Inc.’s then-secret deal with a Silicon Valley company. She also tipped her father Kenneth Milliard with the confidential information. He then traded on the nonpublic information and tipped his sons, who also made trades. The morning the acquisition was announced, the Milliards sold their shares for illicit profits of more than $67,000.

Angela and Kenneth Milliard have agreed to settle the SEC’s charges by paying more than $175,000.  “Angela Milliard exploited her access to confidential merger and acquisition information to illicitly enrich herself and her family,” said Marc Fagel, Director of the SEC’s San Francisco Regional Office. “As a member of a legal department entrusted with sensitive deal documents, she had a duty to safeguard that information, not trade on it.”

According to the SEC’s complaint filed in federal court in Montana, Angela Milliard first gained access to confidential deal information in October 2009, when she learned that Semitool and the acquiring company – Applied Materials Inc. – had entered into advanced merger negotiations. After learning that the tender offer was to happen in mid-November at a nearly 30 percent premium over Semitool’s then-trading price, she wired money to her boyfriend’s brokerage account and used it to surreptitiously buy shares of Semitool.
The SEC alleges that Angela Milliard tipped her father, who also purchased Semitool shares and encouraged his sons to do the same, which they did. They reaped their illegal insider trading profits following the public announcement of the merger on Nov. 17, 2009.

The Milliards settled the SEC’s charges without admitting or denying the allegations. Angela Milliard agreed to pay full disgorgement of her trading profits totaling $20,355 plus prejudgment interest of $1,614.60 and a penalty of $54,022.11. Kenneth Milliard agreed to pay full disgorgement of his and his sons’ trading profits totaling $47,805 plus prejudgment interest of $3,765.19 and a penalty of $47,805.11.
The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Jennifer J. Lee and Jina L. Choi of the San Francisco Regional Office.

SEC CHARGES FIVE WITH INSIDER TRADING ON CONFIDENTIAL MERGER NEGOTIATIONS

The excerpt below is from the SEC website:
March 14, 2012
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that, on March 13, 2012, it charged two financial advisors and three others in their circle of family and friends with insider trading for more than $1.8 million in illicit profits based on confidential information about a Philadelphia-based insurance holding company’s merger negotiations with a Japanese firm.

The SEC’s complaint, filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, charges Timothy J. McGee, of Malvern, Pa., Michael W. Zirinsky, of Schwenksville, Pa., Robert Zirinsky, of Quakertown, Pa. and Hong Kong residents Paulo Lam and Marianna sze wan Ho with violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The complaint also names as relief defendants Michael Zirinsky’s wife Kellie F. Zirinsky, sister Jillynn Zirinsky, mother Geraldine A. Zirinsky, and grandmother Mary L. Zirinsky for the purpose of recovering illegal profits in their trading accounts. Lam and Ho have each agreed to settle the SEC’s charges and pay approximately $1.2 million and $140,000 respectively.

The SEC’s complaint alleges that McGee and Michael Zirinsky, who are registered representatives at Ameriprise Financial Services, illegally traded in the stock of Philadelphia Consolidated Holding Corp. (PHLY) based on nonpublic information about the company’s impending merger with Tokio Marine Holdings. The complaint alleges that McGee misappropriated the inside information from a PHLY senior executive who was confiding in him through their relationship at Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) about pressures he was confronting at work. McGee then purchased PHLY stock in advance of the merger announcement on July 23, 2008, and made a $292,128 profit when the stock price jumped 64 percent that day.

The complaint further alleges that McGee tipped Michael Zirinsky, who purchased PHLY stock in his own trading account as well as those of his wife, sister, mother, and grandmother. Zirinsky tipped his father Robert Zirinsky and his friend Paulo Lam, who in turn tipped another friend whose wife Marianna sze wan Ho also traded on the nonpublic information. The complaint alleges that the Zirinsky family collectively obtained illegal profits of $562,673 through their insider trading. Lam made an illicit profit of $837,975 and Ho profited by $110,580.

The complaint seeks a final judgment ordering disgorgement of ill-gotten gains together with prejudgment interest from the defendants and relief defendants, and permanent injunctions and penalties against the defendants.

Lam and Ho have each consented, without admitting or denying the SEC’s allegations, to the entry of a final judgment permanently enjoining them from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5. Lam agreed to pay $837,975 in disgorgement, $123,649 in prejudgment interest, and a penalty of $251,392. Ho has agreed to pay $110,580 in disgorgement, $16,317 in prejudgment interest, and a penalty of $16,587. The settlements are subject to court approval.

The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Philadelphia Regional Office enforcement staff Brendan P. McGlynn, Patricia A. Paw and Daniel L. Koster. The SEC’s litigation will be led by Scott A. Thompson, Nuriye C. Uygur, and G. Jeffrey Boujoukos.

SEC CHARGES CHICAGO BROKER WITH INSIDER TRADING IN NBTY STOCK

The following excerpt is from the SEC website:
Washington, D.C., March 15, 2012 – The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged a Chicago-based management consultant with insider trading based on confidential information about his client’s impending takeover of a Long Island-based vitamin company.

The SEC alleges that Sherif Mityas and others at his global management consulting firm were retained by Washington, D.C.-based private equity firm The Carlyle Group to provide strategic advice related to the acquisition of NBTY Inc. That same month, Mityas purchased NBTY stock and subsequently tipped a relative who also bought NBTY shares. After Carlyle publicly announced its acquisition of NBTY, Mityas and his relative sold their NBTY stock for a combined profit of nearly $38,000.

Mityas, who is a partner and vice president at the firm, has agreed to pay more than $78,000 to settle the SEC’s charges. In a parallel action, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York today announced the unsealing of criminal charges against Mityas.

“Mityas was entrusted with highly confidential information but, driven by greed, he violated that trust and jeopardized a successful consulting career for the chance to make a quick buck,” said Sanjay Wadhwa, Deputy Chief of the SEC’s Market Abuse Unit and Associate Director of the New York Regional Office. “Corporate transactions such as mergers and acquisitions demand confidentiality until they become public, and not just from company employees but also from the lawyers, accountants, consultants, and others who work on the deals.”

According to the SEC’s complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Mityas’s firm was retained by Carlyle in May 2010. Only five days after being told during a May 17 conference call that NBTY was Carlyle’s acquisition target, Mityas moved $50,000 from a bank account he shared with a relative into a brokerage account they shared. On May 27, he transferred $49,000 from that brokerage account to a different relative’s brokerage account that he controlled as custodian, and then used those funds to purchase 1,300 shares of NBTY at a cost of more than $44,000. On July 7, based on a tip from Mityas, yet another relative bought 440 shares of NBTY stock. That same relative bought an additional 210 shares on July 14. Carlyle’s acquisition of NBTY was publicly announced the following day. Mityas sold all of his shares only three hours after the announcement was made, for an illegal profit of $25,896. The relative held the shares purchased on July 7 and 14 through the completion of the merger, and sold all of the shares on October 1 for an illicit profit of $12,035.

The SEC’s complaint charges Mityas with violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. The settlement, which is subject to court approval, would require Mityas to pay disgorgement of his and his relative’s ill-gotten gains totaling $37,931, plus prejudgment interest of $2,375.39, and a penalty of $37,931. The settlement also would bar Mityas from serving as an officer or director of a public company and permanently enjoin him from future violations of these provisions of the federal securities laws.

The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Daniel R. Marcus and Amelia A. Cottrell – members of the SEC’s Market Abuse Unit in New York – and Layla Mayer of the SEC’s New York Regional Office. The SEC acknowledges the assistance of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).