FLORIDA MAN AND HIS COMPANIES ORDERED TO CEASE FICTITIOUS PRECIOUS METALS SALES

FROM:  COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

CFTC Orders Florida Resident Derek J. Bridges and His Companies, Empire Sterling Metals Corp. and I.P.M. Investments, Inc., to Cease Illegal Fictitious Precious Metals Sales

Order includes restitution award and prohibitions against future activity

Washington, DC - The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) today issued an Order filing and simultaneously settling charges against Derek J. Bridges, a resident of Coral Springs, Florida, and his companies, Empire Sterling Metals Corp. (Empire) and I.P.M. Investments, Inc. (I.P.M.), for engaging in illegal, off-exchange precious metals transactions.

The CFTC Order requires Bridges and Empire jointly to pay restitution totaling $243,456.61 and Bridges and I.P.M. jointly to pay restitution totaling $14,854.41 to their customers. In addition, the Order imposes permanent registration and trading bans on Bridges, Empire, and I.P.M.

As explained in the Order, financed transactions in commodities with retail customers, like those engaged in by Empire and I.P.M., must be executed on or subject to the rules of an exchange approved by the CFTC. The CFTC Order finds that for two years beginning in July 2011, Empire, and subsequently I.P.M., solicited retail customers to engage in financed precious metals transactions, which were executed through Hunter Wise Commodities, LLC (Hunter Wise). Bridges directly solicited customers and supervised other telemarketers involved in solicitation. Bridges and the other telemarketers represented that a customer could purchase precious metals with just a deposit, such as 20 percent, and that the customer would receive a loan for the remaining 80 percent, according to the Order. In addition to interest on the “loan,” the customer also had to pay a commission and a mark-up on the total value of the metal. If the customer agreed to the transaction, the customer sent the deposit, commission, and mark-up to Empire or I.P.M., and the funds were ultimately transferred to Hunter Wise. In return, Hunter Wise paid Empire and I.P.M. a portion of the customer commissions and fees. Neither Empire, I.P.M., nor Hunter Wise bought, sold, loaned, stored, or transferred any physical metals for these transactions. Neither Empire, I.P.M., nor Hunter Wise actually delivered any precious metals to any customer. Notwithstanding the fact that no physical metal was involved, Empire’s and I.P.M.’s transactions were illegal because they were not executed on a registered exchange.

On December 5, 2012, the CFTC sued Hunter Wise in federal court in Florida charging it with engaging in the same type of illegal, off-exchange precious metals transactions engaged in by Empire and I.P.M. through Hunter Wise. In addition, the CFTC charged Hunter Wise with fraud and other violations (see CFTC Press Release 6447-12). On February 25, 2013, the Florida court granted a preliminary injunction against Hunter Wise, froze the firm’s assets, and appointed a corporate monitor to assume control over those assets (see CFTC Press Release 6522-13). On February 19, 2014, the court entered judgment against Hunter Wise for engaging in illegal precious metals transactions.

CFTC Division of Enforcement staff members responsible for this case are Daniel Jordan, Michael Loconte, and Rick Glaser.

COURT ORDERS FLORIDA MAN, COMPANY TO PAY $5.7 MILLION FOR ROLES IN COMMODITY POOL PONZI SCHEME

FROM:  COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 
Federal Court Orders Ward Onsa of Marco Island, Florida and His Company, New Century Investment Management LLC of Southampton, Pennsylvania to Pay $5.7 Million Civil Monetary Penalty for Operating a Commodity Pool Ponzi Scheme

Washington, DC — The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) today announced that on March 20, 2014, Judge Mary A. McLaughlin of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania entered a final judgment Order imposing a civil monetary penalty of almost $6 million against Defendants Ward Onsa of Marco Island, Florida, and his company, New Century Investment Management LLC (New Century), of Southampton, Pennsylvania, in a CFTC enforcement action. The court’s March 20, 2014, Order followed an earlier default judgment Order entered on December 5, 2011, finding that the Defendants had committed fraud and imposing registration and trading bans.

The Orders stem from a CFTC Complaint filed on April 5, 2011, in which the CFTC charged Onsa and New Century with solicitation fraud, misappropriation, and issuing false account statements to commodity pool participants while operating a commodity pool Ponzi scheme (see CFTC Release 6016-11, April 6, 2011).

The court’s partial default judgment Order finds that through Onsa’s fraudulent misrepresentations at least 12 pool participants invested a total of more than $2.2 million with New Century Hedge Fund Partners I, LP to trade commodity futures and options contracts. The Order further finds that the Defendants misappropriated pool participants’ funds and used them to pay personal expenses and to pay earlier participants with newer participants’ funds in the manner of a Ponzi scheme. The Order imposes permanent trading and registration bans on Onsa and New Century, and prohibits them from violating the anti-fraud provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act, as charged.

The court’s final judgment Order concludes that based on the deterrent purposes of a civil monetary penalty (CMP), the egregiousness of the Defendants’ intentional conduct, the length of time of the Defendants’ wrongful trading activity, and the Defendants’ failure to attempt to ameliorate their wrongful conduct, the CFTC’s request for a CMP of triple Defendants’ gain is appropriate and orders Onsa and New Century to jointly pay a CMP of $5.7 million, in addition to post-judgment interest.

The Order provides that all payments made by Onsa pursuant to the Order will be applied first to satisfy Onsa’s criminal restitution obligation in U.S. v. Ward Onsa, Docket No. 10-CR-730 (DLI) (U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York) and, upon satisfaction of that obligation, thereafter will be applied to Defendants’ CMP obligation. In that criminal case, on July 26, 2012, Onsa was sentenced to 78 months imprisonment and on August 21, 2012, was ordered to pay restitution of $3,135,132.22 to 26 victims of various criminal schemes perpetrated by him, including the scheme involving the defrauding of New Century pool participants. Onsa is currently incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institution located in Estill, South Carolina.

The CFTC appreciates the assistance of the Office of the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York.

CFTC Division of Enforcement staff members responsible for this case are Elizabeth Brennan, Philip Rix, Steven Ringer, Lenel Hickson, Jr., and Manal M. Sultan.

CFTC ACTING CHAIRMAN WETJEN STATEMENT ON END-USERS AND DODD-FRANK

FROM:  COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 
Statement of Acting Chairman Mark Wetjen at Roundtable on Dodd-Frank End-User Issues

April 3, 2014

Washington, DC—Commodity Futures Trading Commission Acting Chairman Mark Wetjen made the following statement at the public roundtable on end-users and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank).

“I am pleased the staff has convened today’s roundtable focusing on end-user issues and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Congress was crystal clear that commercial end-users, which make up the overwhelming majority of companies in America, did not cause the crisis. Further, Congress was equally clear that in putting in place the significant derivatives reforms contained in Dodd-Frank, the derivative markets needed to remain accessible to end-users who rely on these markets for hedging and price-discovery needs.

“Looking ahead, the Commission must continue to remain open to revisiting certain rules and making adjustments as necessary. For example, the de minimis exception in the swap dealer definition for Special Entities – defined in the Dodd Frank Act to include federal, state, and municipal entities – was making it difficult for government-owned electric utilities to hedge key operational risks. In response, Commission staff recently issued temporary no-action relief that allows counterparties to exclude utility operations-related swaps from the 25 million dollar threshold.”

“Today, I am pleased to announce that I am putting into circulation a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that would amend the de minimis exception to address this issue. Once the Commission issues the proposal, I look forward to receiving comment from the public and interested parties on this issue. I would like to thank the hardworking staff of the CFTC for convening this roundtable. I am looking forward to hearing the thoughts of everyone participating in the roundtable.”

MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC SETTLES CFTC CHARGES RELATED TO SEGREGATED AND SECURED FUNDS ALLEGED RULE VIOLATIONS

FROM:  COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 
CFTC Orders Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC to Pay $490,000 to Settle Charges Relating to Rules and Regulations Pertaining to Segregated and Secured Amount Funds

Washington, DC — The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) today announced the filing and simultaneous settlement of charges against Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC (MSSB), a registered Futures Commission Merchant (FCM), for violating CFTC rules governing secured funds of foreign futures and option customers, commingling customer and firm funds, failing to prepare accurate daily computations of its segregated and secured funds, failing to properly title account statements for four customer segregated accounts, and failing to diligently supervise its employees handling of matters related to its business as a CFTC registrant. None of the violations resulted in any customer losses, according to the CFTC’s Order. The Order requires MSSB to pay a $490,000 civil monetary penalty and to cease and desist from violating the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC Regulations, as charged.

Specifically, the CFTC’s Order finds that on April 8, 2013, MSSB erroneously transferred approximately $16 million from a customer secured funds bank account resulting in a deficiency in MSSB’s secured funds of approximately $9.27 million. MSSB discovered the error the next day and cured the deficiency, the Order finds. After its secured deficiency in April 2013, MSSB independently engaged KPMG LLP to review its policies and procedures with respect to segregated and secured accounts. KPMG subsequently issued a report recommending changes to MSSB’s policies and procedures, which MSSB has substantially implemented, according to the Order.

The CFTC’s Order also finds that for approximately a six-month period in 2012, MSSB commingled customer segregated and firm funds in a customer segregated bank account.

In addition, for approximately an eight-month period in 2012, MSSB failed to prepare accurate daily computations of its segregated and secured funds, according to the Order. None of the errors caused MSSB to fall below its required segregated or secured funds; however, MSSB was required to refile 120 daily statements as a result of the errors, the Order finds.

Finally, the CFTC’s Order finds that during several months in 2012, account statements for four MSSB segregated accounts were improperly titled as customer secured accounts.

CFTC Division of Enforcement staff responsible for this matter are Allison Passman, David Terrell, Joseph J. Patrick, Ava Gould, Scott R. Williamson, and Rosemary Hollinger. The Division thanks the Commission’s Division of Swaps and Intermediary Oversight and the National Futures Association for their assistance in this matter.

CFTC FILES CHARGES FOR OPERATING PONZI SCHEME AGAINST TWO SOUTH CAROLINA RESIDENTS

FROM:  COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 
CFTC Charges South Carolina Residents Robert S. and Amy L. Leben with Commodity Pool Fraud for the Operation of a Multi-Million Dollar Ponzi Scheme

Federal Court Issues Emergency Order Freezing Defendants’ Assets and Protecting Books and Records

Washington, DC – The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced today that, on March 14, 2014, Judge Terry L. Wooten of the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina issued an emergency Order freezing assets under the control of Robert S. Leben and Amy L. Leben (Lebens) of Columbia, South Carolina, in connection with a commodity pool called Structured Finance Group Corporation (SFG).  The Order also prohibits the Lebens from destroying books and records and allows the CFTC immediate access to those records.

This court’s emergency Order arises out of a CFTC enforcement action filed under seal on March 12, 2014, charging the Lebens with fraudulently soliciting and/or accepting at least $3.2 million from pool participants in connection with their operation of the SFG commodity pool from August 2008 to the present.  The CFTC Complaint also charges the Lebens with misappropriating pool participant funds and failing to register with the CFTC as Commodity Pool Operators in connection with their operation of SFG.  In addition, the complaint charges Amy Leben with improper operation of the pool.

The Lebens allegedly misappropriated at least $1.77 million for their personal use

According to the Complaint, the Lebens misappropriated at least $1.77 million of pool participant funds for their personal use, including to purchase their residence and a swimming pool, among other things.  The Complaint also charges Robert Leben with fraudulently guaranteeing pool participants’ principal investment against risk of loss, guaranteeing annual returns of 14 percent, and bolstering these guarantees by issuing written false statements to pool participants.  In addition, to perpetuate their fraud, the Lebens operated SFG as a Ponzi scheme through which they used pool participant funds to pay other pool participants a total of approximately $1 million as purported profits, according to the Complaint.

In its continuing litigation, the CFTC seeks a permanent injunction from future violations of federal commodities laws, permanent registration and trading bans, full restitution to defrauded pool participants, disgorgement of any ill-gotten gains, and civil monetary penalties.

The CFTC appreciates the cooperation of the South Carolina Attorney General’s Office, the U.S. Marshals Service, and the Office of the U.S. Attorney for the District of South Carolina in this matter.

CFTC Division of Enforcement staff members responsible for this case are Amanda Harding, Elizabeth Davis, Michael Loconte, Erica Bodin, Richard Foelber, and Rick Glaser.

CFTC ORDERS MORGAN STANLEY CAPITAL GROUP TO PAY $200,000 PENALTY

FROM:  COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 
CFTC Orders Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. to Pay $200,000 Penalty for Violating Soybean Meal Futures Speculative Position Limits

Washington, DC — The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) today announced that Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. (MSCGI) agreed to pay a $200,000 civil monetary penalty to settle CFTC charges that it exceeded speculative position limits in soybean meal futures contracts trading on the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT).

The CFTC Order finds that, beginning on January 14, 2013, MSCGI held in its house accounts net long positions in the CBOT soybean meal futures contract in excess of the all-months speculative position limit of 6,500 contracts established by the CFTC. The Order further finds that, on January 15, 2013, MSCGI decreased its net long position in CBOT soybean meal futures, but its position still exceeded the soybean all-months position limit. On January 16, 2013, MSCGI reduced its position below the CBOT soybean meal position limit, according to the CFTC Order.

In addition to imposing the $200,000 civil monetary penalty, the CFTC Order requires MSGCI to cease and desist from further violations of Section 4a(b)(2) of the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC Regulation 150.2, as charged.

CFTC Division of Enforcement staff members responsible for this action are Karin N. Roth, David W. MacGregor, Lenel Hickson, Jr., and Manal M. Sultan.

COURT ORDERS ARIZONA MAN TO PAY OVER $1.2 MILLION STEMMING FROM SOLICITATION FRAUD CASE

FROM:  COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 
Federal Court Orders Arizona Resident Ray Thomas Brown to Pay over $1.2 Million for Solicitation Fraud and Misappropriation in Operating Two Commodity Scams

Washington, DC – The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) today announced that Judge Frederick J. Martone of the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona granted the CFTC’s motion for summary judgment and entered an Order of permanent injunction against Defendant Ray Thomas Brown, of Phoenix, Arizona. The Order imposes permanent trading and registration bans against Brown and requires him to pay restitution and disgorgement totaling $1,131,941.98 and a civil monetary penalty of $140,000.

The Order stems from a CFTC Complaint filed on November 26, 2012 (see CFTC Press Release 6448-12, December 6, 2012), charging Brown with fraud, misappropriation, and registration violations in operating two scams, one involving fraud while acting as a Commodity Pool Operator (CPO) and the other involving fraud while acting as a Commodity Trading Advisor (CTA). Brown duped customers into sending at least $1.2 million to bank and trading accounts under his control, according to the Complaint. The CFTC Complaint also charged Brown with illegally operating as an unregistered CPO and CTA.

The Order finds that Brown fraudulently solicited approximately $1,163,519 from more than 200 individuals. Of that amount, Brown deposited only approximately $86,000 into commodity pool trading accounts, which was promptly lost in trading. The Order also finds that Brown used the bulk of the funds he solicited on personal expenses and to further his fraudulent scheme. In making his solicitations, Brown lied about his background, fabricated his past and present investment performance, disseminated false account statements, and failed to disclose that he was not registered with the CFTC in any capacity, according to the Order.

A Related Criminal Action

In a related criminal action, Brown pleaded guilty on May 7, 2013, to wire fraud. Brown is currently awaiting sentencing (United States v. Ray Thomas Brown, Case No. 8:13-cr-00035-UA (United States District Court for the Central District of California)).

The CFTC thanks the United States Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Black Mountain Precinct of the Phoenix Police Department, and the Arizona Corporation Commission for their assistance and cooperation on this matter.

CFTC Division of Enforcement staff members responsible for this case are Dmitriy Vilenskiy, Jonathan Robell, Richard Foelber, Paul Hayeck, and Joan Manley.

CFTC CHARGES TWO MEN WITH MISAPPROPRIATION OF OVER $1.6 MILLION

FROM:  COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 
CFTC Charges Ron Earl McCullough and David Christopher Mayhew with Fraudulent Solicitation, False Statements, and Misappropriation of More than$1.6 Million of Customer Funds

CFTC Separately Orders Travis Maurice Cox to Pay Restitution and Penalties to Settle Fraud Charges

Washington, DC - The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) filed an enforcement action in the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of North Carolina, charging Ron Earl McCullough and David Christopher Mayhew. The CFTC Complaint charges McCullough and Mayhew with fraudulently soliciting, directly and through others, approximately $2.3 million from at least 11 individuals to trade leveraged or margined off-exchange foreign currency (forex) contracts. Further, the CFTC Complaint alleges that McCullough and Mayhew misappropriated at least $1.6 million of their customers’ funds.

In a separate but related matter, the CFTC issued an administrative Order against Travis Maurice Cox that sets forth Cox’s fraudulent conduct in connection with his solicitations on behalf of his forex trading partners.

CFTC Complaint against McCullough and Mayhew

The CFTC Complaint alleges that, from approximately December 2008 until approximately January 2012, McCullough and Mayhew, directly and through others, misrepresented the risks of trading forex; falsely guaranteed the return of customers’ principal; falsely promised high returns, including double returns in short periods of time; and failed to disclose that they intended to use customer funds to pay principal and purported profits to other customers and for personal expenses. During this period, McCullough and Mayhew were residents of Raleigh, North Carolina, according to the Complaint.

The Complaint also alleges that Mayhew caused false account statements to be issued that concealed his and McCullough’s misappropriation, trading losses, and lack of trading, and that McCullough and Mayhew aided and abetted each other’s violations of the Commodity Exchange Act (Act) and a CFTC regulation, as charged.

The Complaint further charges that McCullough and Mayhew misappropriated approximately $808,000 to make purported payments of principal and profits to customers. In addition, McCullough and Mayhew misappropriated approximately $829,000, using their customers’ funds to pay for their own personal expenses, including an online forex trading course and travel expenses.

In its continuing litigation against McCullough and Mayhew, the CFTC seeks civil monetary penalties, restitution, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, trading and registration bans, and a permanent injunction against further violations of the federal commodities laws, as charged.

CFTC Administrative Order against Travis Maurice Cox

According to the CFTC administrative Order as to Cox, a resident of North Carolina, from about August 2009 through December 2011, Cox fraudulently solicited approximately $1.3 million from at least five individuals to trade forex through Cox and his partners. The Order also finds that Cox falsely told his customers that his partners had made money for Cox through forex trading, and that they could be trusted. Cox also represented that all of his customers’ funds would be traded, but failed to transfer all such funds to his partners for trading.

Further, according to the Order, Cox misappropriated approximately $114,000 of his customers’ funds by either failing to deposit that money into forex trading accounts or transferring it to his partners for trading.

The Order requires Cox to make restitution of $1,306,010.95 to his defrauded customers and to pay a $330,000 civil monetary penalty. The Order also requires Cox to cease and desist from further violations of the Act and a CFTC regulation, as charged, and imposes permanent bans on trading, registration, and certain other commodity-related activities.

CFTC Division of Enforcement staff members responsible for this case are Glenn I. Chernigoff, James H. Holl, III, Maura Viehmeyer, Richard A. Glaser, and Gretchen L. Lowe.

ARIZONA RESIDENT GETS 30 MONTHS IN PRISON IN COMMODITY POOL FRAUD CASE

FROM:   COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

CFTC Obtains Court Order against Arizona Resident Thomas L. Hampton for Issuing False Account Statements and Operating as an Unregistered Commodity Pool Operator

Hampton ordered to pay a $1.5 million penalty and permanently barred from any commodity-related activities

In a related criminal matter, Hampton sentenced to 30 months in prison and ordered to pay over $4.8 million in restitution

Washington, DC – The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) today announced that Judge H. Russel Holland of the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona entered an Order of final judgment by default and permanent injunction against Defendant Thomas L. Hampton of Scottsdale, Arizona. The Order requires Hampton to pay a $1.5 million civil monetary penalty, imposes permanent trading and registration bans on him, and prohibits him from violating the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA), as charged. Hampton has never been registered with the CFTC.

The Order, entered on January 23, 2014, stems from a CFTC Complaint filed on June 11, 2013, charging Hampton with acting as an unregistered Commodity Pool Operator (CPO) and issuing false account statements in violation of the CEA (see CFTC Press Release 6609-13, June 12, 2013).

The Order finds that, from approximately September 2010 through at least September 2011, Hampton, while acting as an unregistered CPO, operated Hampton Capital Markets, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, as a commodity pool. The Order finds that Hampton solicited approximately $5.2 million from at least 72 pool participants to invest in the pool for the purpose of trading commodity futures contracts, including E-mini S&P 500 futures contracts and E-mini Dow futures contracts, as well as securities-based index products. The Order also finds that Hampton defrauded pool participants by issuing false account statements that represented that the pool was generating significant trading profits, when, in fact, Hampton’s actual trading in the HCM Pool accounts resulted in net losses virtually every month.

In a related criminal action, on April 19, 2013, Hampton pleaded guilty to one count of commodities fraud. In October 2013, Hampton was sentenced to 30 months in prison and was further ordered to pay over $4.8 million in restitution (United States v. Thomas Hampton, Case No. 13-cr-00301-RWS (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)).

The CFTC appreciates the assistance of the Arizona Corporation Commission, Securities Division, and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York.

CFTC Division of Enforcement staff responsible for this case are Eugene Smith, Tracey Wingate, Kyong J. Koh, Peter M. Haas, Paul G. Hayeck, and Joan Manley.

DISGORGEMENT AND FINES ORDERED FOR COMMODITY TRADING SYSTEM PROMOTERS

FROM:  COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

Federal Court Orders California Defendants CTI Group, LLC, Cooper Trading, Stephen Craig Symons, and James David Kline to Pay Over $29 Million in Disgorgement and Fines for Fraudulent Sale of Automated Trading Systems

Washington, DC – The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) today announced that Judge Katherine Polk Failla of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York entered a Consent Order for Permanent Injunction (Order) against Defendants CTI Group, LLC, a California limited liability company, Cooper Trading, a California corporation (collectively, CTI), Stephen Craig Symons of Corona del Mar, California, and James David Kline, who was a resident of Van Nuys, California, for fraudulent sales practices in connection with the sale of two automated trading systems (Trading Systems), known as Boomer and Victory.

The court’s Order stems from a CFTC Complaint filed on May 11, 2012, that charged the Defendants with the fraudulent solicitation of clients to subscribe to the Boomer and Victory Trading Systems, which were used by clients to trade E-mini Standard and Poor’s 500 Stock Index futures contracts in managed accounts (see CFTC Press Release 6266-12 and Complaint).

The Order, entered on January 22, 2014, requires Defendants CTI Group and Cooper Trading to pay $10.175 million in disgorgement and a $10 million civil monetary penalty, Symons to pay over $3.150 million in disgorgement and a $4.5 million civil monetary penalty, and Kline to pay over $275,000 in disgorgement and a $1 million civil monetary penalty. The Order further imposes permanent trading and registration bans on the Defendants and prohibits them from violating the anti-fraud and disclosure provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and CFTC regulations, as charged.

The CFTC’s Complaint also named as Relief Defendants California companies Snonys, Inc. and Dragonfyre Magick Incorporated, which, according to the Complaint, were owned or operated by Symons and Kline, respectively. The Order provides for the disgorgement of Relief Defendants’ funds frozen pursuant to a court order that was previously entered on May 14, 2012.

The Order further finds that, since at least in or around August 2009, CTI and its agents and employees made false and misleading statements and omitted material information when soliciting clients to purchase subscriptions to CTI’s Trading Systems, including (1) how long CTI had been in business, (2) CTI’s experience developing and marketing Trading Systems, (3) the identities and professional experience of CTI’s personnel (who used fictitious names when communicating with clients), (4) the track record of CTI’s Trading Systems, (5) the past profitability of CTI’s Trading Systems, (6) the transaction costs associated with trading via CTI’s Trading Systems, and (7) the risks associated with trading futures contracts via CTI’s Trading Systems.

CTI’s salespeople, including Kline, made false statements to clients and prospective clients about CTI’s purported money-back guarantee, and Symons and Kline are liable for all of CTI’s violations because they controlled CTI and actively participated in CTI’s unlawful conduct, according to the Order.

According to the Order, funds were transferred to the Relief Defendants from CTI as a result of the Defendants’ violations of the CEA and CFTC regulations, and the Relief Defendants do not have a legitimate claim to or interest in those funds.

The CFTC thanks the National Futures Association for its assistance.

CFTC Division of Enforcement staff members responsible for this case are R. Stephen Painter, Jr., Michael C. McLaughlin, David W. MacGregor, Lenel Hickson, Jr., and Manal M. Sultan.

CFTC Fraud Awareness Advisories & Customer Protection Information

The CFTC has issued several customer protection Fraud Advisories that provide the warning signs of fraud, including an Advisory covering Commodity Trading Systems Sold on the Internet. This Advisory states that the CFTC has seen an increase in websites that fraudulently promote commodity trading systems and advisory services and provides information designed to help customers identify this potential swindle before they invest.

Customers can file a tip or complaint to report suspicious activities or other information, such as possible violations of commodity trading laws, to the CFTC Division of Enforcement via a Toll-Free Hotline 866-FON-CFTC (866-366-2382) or an online form.

CFTC ANNOUNCES TRADE EXECUTION MANDATE FOR ADDITIONAL INTEREST RATE SWAPS

FROM:  COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s Division of Market Oversight Announces Trade Execution Mandate for Additional Interest Rate Swaps

trueEX, LLC’s Available-to-Trade Determinations Are Deemed Certified

Washington, DC — The Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (CFTC or Commission) Division of Market Oversight (Division) today announced that trueEX, LLC’s (trueEX) self-certification of available-to-trade determinations (MAT Determinations) for certain interest rate swap contracts is deemed certified.

This self-certification includes certain interest rate swap contracts made available to trade via an earlier determination that was deemed certified on January 16, 2014, as well as additional swap contracts. Under Commission regulations, the additional swaps in this MAT Determination, whether listed or offered by trueEX or any other designated contract market (DCM) or swap execution facility (SEF), will become subject to the trade execution requirement under section 2(h)(8) of the Commodity Exchange Act 30 days after certification, on February 21, 2014.

All transactions involving swaps that are subject to the trade execution requirement must be executed through a DCM or a SEF. To the extent swaps subject to the trade execution requirement are executed on a SEF, they must be executed in accordance with the execution methods prescribed by Commission regulations.

COURT ORDERS $1.5 MILLION IN SANCTIONS IN FOREX FRAUD CASE

FROM:  COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 
Federal Court in Texas Orders $1.5 Million in Sanctions against Defendant Mark E. Rice for Fraudulent Forex Scheme

Washington, DC — The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) obtained a federal court Order requiring Defendant Mark E. Rice, of Sugar Land, Texas, to pay $827,000 in restitution and a $673,000 civil monetary penalty to settle CFTC charges related to fraudulent solicitation and misappropriation of customer funds to trade leveraged off-exchange foreign currency contracts (forex). The Consent Order of Permanent Injunction, entered on January 13, 2014, by Judge Lee H. Rosenthal of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, also imposes permanent trading and registration bans against Rice and prohibits him from violating provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act, as charged.

The Consent Order stems from a CFTC Complaint filed on June 29, 2011, against Rice and Rice’s company, Financial Robotics, Inc. (see CFTC Press Release 6067-11).

The Order finds that, from June 2008, Rice operated a fraudulent scheme that solicited approximately $1.7 million from one individual to trade leveraged off-exchange forex contracts. According to the Order, Rice falsely told his customer, among other things, that his investment was “risk free” and insured against loss and that the return of his principal was guaranteed. The Order further finds that Rice misappropriated at least $576,000 of his customer’s funds by transferring the money to unrelated Rice-controlled companies and, thereafter, spending at least $404,000 of those funds for Rice’s personal and business expenses.

The CFTC’s litigation continues against Financial Robotics, Inc.

The CFTC thanks the National Futures Association, the British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission, The Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets, and the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority for their assistance.

CFTC Division of Enforcement staff members responsible for this case are Kevin S. Webb, Michelle S. Bougas, James H. Holl, III, and Gretchen L. Lowe.

TWO COMPANIES TO PAY $500,000 FOR CALL COTTON REPORTING VIOLATIONS

FROM:  COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 
CFTC Orders Multigrain SA and Agricola Xingu SA to Pay $500,000 for Call Cotton Reporting Violations

Washington, DC – The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) today issued an Order filing and settling charges against Multigrain SA (Multigrain) and Agricola Xingu SA (Agricola Xingu), Brazil-based companies that produce and trade cotton and other agricultural products, for failing to comply with their legal obligation as reportable traders to submit weekly Form 304 Reports that show their call cotton purchases and sales.

The CFTC Order explains that CFTC Regulations specifically require cotton merchants and dealers that hold or control at least 100 cotton futures positions, the reportable level for cotton futures contracts under CFTC Regulations, to file CFTC Form 304 Reports that show their call cotton purchases and sales as of the close of business Friday, and no later than two business days following the date of the report. According to the Order, call cotton refers to physical cotton bought or sold, or contracted for purchase or sale, at a price to be fixed later based on a specified delivery month’s futures price. As stated in the Order, the CFTC uses information it gathers from CFTC Form 304 Reports in its weekly Cotton On-Call Reports, published with other Market Reports on the CFTC website at www.cftc.gov/MarketReports/CottonOnCall/index.htm.

The CFTC Order finds that on at least 24 occasions between January 1, 2013 and October 31, 2013, Multigrain and Agricola Xingu held or controlled at least 100 cotton futures positions, but failed to file CFTC Form 304 Reports as required, either by failing to file Form 304 Reports or filing Form 304 Reports late.

The CFTC Order requires Multigrain and Agricola Xingu to jointly pay a $500,000 civil monetary penalty and prohibits them from committing future violations of the CFTC Regulation requiring reports pertaining to cotton call purchases and sales, as charged. The Order also requires Multigrain and Agricola Xingu to adopt internal controls that are reasonably designed to ensure that they comply fully with enhanced written procedures they have adopted regarding future compliance with the CFTC cotton reporting Regulation.

Consistent with this filing, the CFTC issued a market advisory on May 8, 2013 to remind cotton market participants of their ongoing obligation to comply in a timely manner with applicable reporting obligations. See CFTC Staff Advisory No. 13-14 (Obligation of Reportable Market Participants to File CFTC Form 304 Reports for Call Cotton in a Timely Manner as Required by Commission Regulation 19.02) (May 8, 2013).

COURT ORDERS INTRODUCING BROKER TO PAY FINE FOR RECORD-KEEPING VIOLATIONS

FROM:  COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 
Federal Court in Illinois Orders Chicago-based Introducing Broker New World Holdings, LLC to Pay $50,000 to Settle Record-Keeping Violation Action

Washington, DC – The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) obtained a federal court Order against Defendant New World Holdings, LLC (NWH) of Chicago, Illinois, requiring NWH to pay a $50,000 civil monetary penalty for destroying business records and failing to diligently supervise employees.

The Consent Order for Permanent Injunction, entered by U.S. District Court Judge Robert W. Gettleman of the Northern District of Illinois on January 8, 2014, also permanently prohibits NWH from violating the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC Regulations, as charged in the Complaint filed against NWH and two other Defendants on July 22, 2010 (see CFTC Press Release 5861-10). NWH is registered with the CFTC as an Introducing Broker and Commodity Trading Advisor.

The Order finds that, beginning on or about March 10, 2006, NWH introduced an account in the name of Idylic Solutions Pty Ltd. (Idylic) to a Futures Commission Merchant. In addition to the Idylic account, NWH introduced a number of other accounts from the same individuals who opened the Idylic account, or associated with them, including but not limited to accounts in the name of Unifund, Ltd., 888 Management, Inc., Secured Bond, Ltd., and Sagacity, Ltd. (collectively referred to as the “Pooled Accounts”). Deposits into the Idylic account and the Pooled Accounts in the aggregate exceeded $21 million throughout the relevant period, according to the Order.

NWH failed to retain all of the business records related to the Idylic account and Pooled Accounts, relating to NWH’s business of dealing in commodity futures, commodity options, and cash commodities, including but not limited to emails that were prepared in the course of its business of dealing in commodity futures, and further failed to keep said records for a period of five years from the date thereof, according to the Order.

The CFTC appreciates the assistance of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission in this matter.

CFTC staff members responsible for this case are Eugene Smith, Elizabeth N. Pendleton, Michael Amakor, Timothy J. Mulreany, and Paul Hayeck.

COMPANY, OWNERS CHARGED IN OFF-EXCHANGE FINANCED TRANSACTIONS

FROM:  COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

CFTC Charges Florida-Based Vertical Integration Group LLC and Its Owners, Richard V. Morello and Junior Alexis, with Engaging in Illegal, Off-exchange Commodity Transactions

Washington, DC – The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) today announced that it filed a civil injunctive enforcement action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida against Vertical Integration Group LLC (Vertical) of Lake Worth, Florida, its owner, Richard V. Morello of Lake Worth, Florida, and Junior Alexis of Boynton Beach, Florida. The CFTC Complaint charges the Defendants with engaging in illegal, off-exchange financed transactions in precious metals with retail customers.

The CFTC Complaint alleges that from July 16, 2011, and continuing through at least February 2013, the Defendants solicited retail customers to buy physical precious metals in off-exchange leveraged transactions. Specifically, the CFTC alleges that customers paid Vertical a portion of the purchase price for the metals, and Vertical financed the remainder of the purchase price, while charging the customers interest on the amount purportedly loaned to customers.

Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank Act), a financed transaction such as those conducted by Vertical is an illegal off-exchange transaction unless it results in actual delivery of metal within 28 days. The CFTC Complaint alleges that with regard to the financed transactions, Vertical’s customers never took delivery of the precious metals they purportedly purchased.

The CFTC further alleges that when Vertical engaged in these illegal transactions they were acting as a dealer for metals merchant Hunter Wise Commodities, LLC (Hunter Wise), whom the CFTC charged with fraud and other violations in federal court in Florida on December 5, 2012 (see CFTC Press Release 6447-12). As alleged in the CFTC Complaint against Hunter Wise and in the Complaint in this case, neither Vertical, nor Hunter Wise actually purchased or held metal on the customers’ behalf.

In its continuing litigation, the CFTC seeks civil monetary penalties, restitution, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, trading and registration bans, and a permanent injunction against further violations of the federal commodities laws, as charged.

The CFTC Division of Enforcement staff responsible for this action are Michelle Bougas, Alan I. Edelman, Alison Wilson, Michael Solinsky, Charles Marvine, and Gretchen L. Lowe.

CFTC COMMISSIONER O'MALIA'S DISSENTING STATEMENT ON NON-U.S. SWAP DEALERS

FROM:  COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 
Dissenting Statement by Commissioner Scott D. O’Malia

Request for Comment on Application of Commission Regulations to Swaps Between Non-U.S. Swap Dealers and Non-U.S. Counterparties Involving Personnel or Agents of the Non-U.S. Swap Dealers Located in the United States

January 2, 2014

If you thought that the Commission’s approach last year regarding cross-border issues resulted in an unsound rulemaking process, the start of 2014 is no better.

Today’s announcement of the request for comment on a staff Advisory abrogates the Commission’s fundamental legal obligations under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) and provides another example of the Commission’s unsound rule implementation process.

Making matters worse, today’s request for comment is completely outside the scope of the cross-border Guidance and the Exemptive Order as the Commission did not address the issue relating to swaps negotiated between non-U.S. swap dealers (“SDs”) and non-U.S. counterparties acting through agents of the non-U.S. SDs located in the United States. This is simply a strategic move by the Commission to try to duck blame for consistently circumventing the fundamental tenets of the APA and failing to adhere faithfully to the express congressional directive to limit the extraterritorial application of the Dodd-Frank Act to foreign transactions that “have a direct and significant connection with activities in, or effect on, commerce of the United States.”1

Moreover, I question why the Commission has decided to request comment on a narrow issue of the extraterritorial application of Dodd-Frank, while essentially ignoring the dozens of comments already filed as part of the Commission’s cross-border Exemptive Order.2 Simply requesting comment on a staff Advisory does not endorse the validity of the cross-border Guidance or the staff Advisory issued based on the Guidance.

Additionally, I have serious concerns with the evolving jurisdictional application of the Commission’s authority over cross-border trades. It appears based on the staff Advisory, that the Commission is applying a “territorial” jurisdiction test to elements of a trade between non-U.S. entities. To better understand the legal underpinnings of this position, I have included several additional questions to be considered as part of the overall comment file. It is my hope that public comments will provide greater clarity regarding our cross-border authority and identify areas where we must harmonize global rules with our international regulatory partners in the near future. It makes no sense to apply guidance or staff advisories that do not enjoy the full support and authority provided through rulemakings based on the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”).

Looking forward into this year, the CFTC needs to do away with the reflexive rule implementation process via staff no-action and advisories that are not voted on by the Commission. It should be the goal of the Commission to develop rules that adhere to the APA and ensure proper regulatory oversight, transparency and promote competition in the derivatives space.

In this regard, I would like to seek additional comment on the following points:

1. Please provide your views on whether Covered Transactions with non-U.S. persons who are not guaranteed or conduit affiliates of U.S. persons meet the direct and significant test under CEA section 2(i).3  Please provide a detailed analysis of any such view and its effect on other aspects of the Commission’s cross-border policy, if any. Would your view change depending on whether a non-U.S. SD is a guaranteed affiliate or a conduit affiliate of a U.S. person?

2. CEA section 2(a)(1)4 provides for the general jurisidiction of the Commission. Please provide your views on whether Covered Transactions with non-U.S. persons who are not guaranteed or conduit affiliates of U.S. persons fall within the Commission’s jurisdiction under CEA section 2(a)(1) or any other provision of the CEA providing for Commission jurisdiction. Please provide a detailed analysis of any such view and its effect on other aspects of the Commission’s cross-border policy, if any. Would your view change depending on the nature of the non-U.S. SD (i.e., whether it is a guaranteed affiliate or a conduit affiliate of a U.S. person)?

3. To the extent that Covered Transactions fall within the Commission’s jurisdiction, should a non-U.S. SD be required to comply with all, or only certain, Transaction-Level Requirements? Please provide a detailed analysis of any such view and its effect on other aspects of the Commission’s cross-border policy, if any. Would your view change depending on the nature of the non-U.S. SD (i.e., whether it is a guaranteed affiliate or a conduit affiliate of a U.S. person)?

4. In the open meeting to consider the cross-border final guidance and cross-border phase-in exemptive order, I asked about the Commission’s enforcement and legal authority under the cross-border guidance. The Commission’s General Counsel replied, “[T]he guidance itself is not binding strictly. We couldn’t go into court and, in a count of the complaint, list a violation of the guidance as an actionable claim.”5 If the Commission adopts the staff Advisory as Commission policy (and not through the rulemaking process), please provide your views on the Commission’s ability to enforce such policy.

CFTC MOVES ON COMMENT REQUEST REGARDING NON-U.S. SWAP DEALERS

FROM:  COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 
CFTC Approves Request for Comment on Application of Commission Regulations to U.S. Activities of Non-U.S. Swap Dealers

Washington, DC — The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (Commission) today approved the issuance of a notice of request for public comment on a staff advisory regarding the applicability of certain Commission regulations to the activity in the United States of registered, non-U.S. swap dealers when entering into swaps with non-U.S. persons.

The Commission seeks comment on all aspects of the November 14, 2013 staff advisory 13-69 in view of the complex legal and policy issues involved. Comments must be received within 60 days after publication of the notice in the Federal Register.

CFTC & FERC SIGN MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING INVESTIGATIONS AND SURVEILLANCE

FROM:  COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

January 2, 2014

FERC, CFTC Sign MOUs on Jurisdiction and Information Sharing

Washington, DC — The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) have signed two Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) to address circumstances of overlapping jurisdiction and to share information in connection with market surveillance and investigations into potential market manipulation, fraud or abuse. The MOUs allow the agencies to promote effective and efficient regulation to protect energy market competitors and consumers.

The jurisdiction MOU sets out a process under which the agencies will notify each other of activities that may involve overlapping jurisdiction and coordinate to address the agencies’ regulatory concerns. The new information sharing MOU establishes procedures through which the agencies will share information of mutual interest related to their respective market surveillance and investigative responsibilities, while maintaining confidentiality and data protection. In support of the new information sharing MOU, CFTC Chairman Gary Gensler and FERC Acting Chairman Cheryl LaFleur also agreed that the agencies will work together to share appropriate data relating to financial markets for gas and electricity on an ongoing basis.

“These memoranda will further strengthen FERC’s ability to perform its market oversight and enforcement responsibilities,” said Acting Chairman LaFleur. “As FERC’s role in overseeing the competitive energy markets has grown since the passage of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, our need to coordinate with the CFTC is increasingly important. I appreciate Chairman Gensler’s work on these agreements and look forward to continued cooperation between our agencies.”

“I’m so pleased that with Acting Chairman LaFleur, our two agencies have been able to enter into these Memoranda of Understanding,” said CFTC Chairman Gensler. “These memoranda will help lead to better protection of the nation’s energy markets and increase cooperation between the agencies.”

Congress directed the CFTC and FERC to develop the MOUs as part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The agencies have been operating under a 2005 MOU that allowed information exchange related to oversight or investigations.

FICTITIOUS TRADING RESULTS IN REAL PENALTY OF $600,000

FROM:  U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 
December 19, 2013

Federal Court in New York Orders Defendant David M. Nunn to Pay a $600,000 Civil Monetary Penalty for Engaging in an Illegal Coffee Futures Trading Scheme and Making False Statements to ICE Futures U.S. Court Permanently Bans Nunn from Trading or Registration with the CFTC

Washington, DC – The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) today announced that Judge Lewis A. Kaplan of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York entered a consent Order against David M. Nunn for entering into fictitious sales, engaging in illegal noncompetitive and fictitious trades in coffee futures contracts over a two-year period, and making false statements to representatives of ICE Futures U.S., Inc. (ICE). Nunn is a Vermont resident and a former ICE floor broker.

The consent Order of permanent injunction, entered on December 18, 2013, requires Nunn to pay a $600,000 civil monetary penalty and, among other sanctions, permanently bans Nunn from trading on a registered entity, soliciting or receiving funds for trading on a registered entity, applying for registration or claiming exemption from registration with the CFTC, or acting as a principal or agent of any CFTC registrant or person exempted from registration.

The Order stems from a CFTC Complaint filed on October 18, 2012 (see CFTC Press Release 6393-12). The Complaint alleged that, from at least July 2008 through September 2010, Nunn engaged in over 1,300 non-competitive, fictitious coffee futures trades on ICE. The Complaint further alleged that, through this illegal scheme, Nunn transferred over $1.68 million to another account that he controlled.

The Order states that Nunn engaged in a series of unlawful, non-competitive commodity futures transactions involving coffee futures on ICE. The Order also states that Nunn intentionally made non-competitive, fictitious sales by placing virtually simultaneous orders to buy or sell in accounts either held in his name or held under another person’s name that he controlled. Nunn made false statements to ICE officials during an interview when he denied that monies were transferred to him from the account held under the other person’s name, according to the Order.

In a related ICE proceeding, Nunn was expelled from ICE membership and is prohibited from directly or indirectly accessing the exchange’s markets. The CFTC appreciates the assistance of ICE in this matter.

CFTC Division of Enforcement staff members responsible for this case are Trevor Kokal, Michael Geiser, David Oakland, David Acevedo, Lenel Hickson, and Manal Sultan.

6 JURISDICTIONS APPROVED BY CFTC FOR COMPARABILITY DETERMINATIONSREGARDING SWAP PROVISIONS OF DODD-FRANK

FROM:  U.S. COMMODITIES FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 
December 20, 2013
CFTC Approves Comparability Determinations for Six Jurisdictions for Substituted Compliance Purposes

Australia, Canada, the European Union, Hong Kong, Japan, and Switzerland are deemed comparable with respect to certain swaps provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act

Washington, DC — The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (Commission) today approved a series of broad comparability determinations that would permit substituted compliance with non-U.S. regulatory regimes as compared to certain swaps provisions of Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) and the Commission’s regulations. Substituted compliance describes the circumstances where the Commission’s general policy would be to permit non-U.S. swap dealers or non-U.S. MSPs whose swaps activities might bring them within the scope of certain Commission regulations, to use compliance with regulations in their home jurisdiction as a substitute for compliance with the relevant Commission regulations. This approach builds on the Commission’s long-standing policy of recognizing comparable regulatory regimes based on international coordination and comity principles with respect to cross-border activities involving futures and options.

The vote was conducted via seriatim, which was approved by three commissioners. The comparability determinations will be published in the Federal Register.

In accordance with the Commission’s general policy and procedural framework described in its Interpretative Guidance and Policy Statement Regarding Compliance with Certain Swap Regulations published on July 26, 2013 (the Cross-Border Guidance), the comparability determinations are part of substituted compliance with respect to Commission regulations applicable to swaps activities outside the U.S.

This approval by the Commission also reflects a collaborative effort with authorities and market participants from each of the six jurisdictions that has registered swap dealers. Working with authorities in Australia, Canada, the European Union (EU), Hong Kong, Japan, and Switzerland, the Commission was able to issue comparability determinations for a broad range of entity-level requirements (see related attached summary chart). In two jurisdictions, the EU and Japan, the Commission also approved substituted compliance for a number of key transaction-level requirements. For the EU, the Commission is issuing comparability determinations for transaction-level requirements under Commission regulations 23.501, 23.502, 23.503, and certain provisions of 23.202 and 23.504. For Japan, the Commission is issuing comparability determinations for transaction-level requirements under certain provisions of Commission regulations 23.202 and 23.504.

As jurisdictions outside the U.S. continue to strengthen their regulatory regimes, the Commission may determine that additional foreign regulatory requirements are comparable to and as comprehensive as certain requirements under the CEA and the Commission’s regulations.