Search This Blog


This is a photo of the National Register of Historic Places listing with reference number 7000063
Showing posts with label LOSSES. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LOSSES. Show all posts

Sunday, May 11, 2014

SEC CHARGES BROUGHT AGAINST HEDGE FUND ADVISORY FIRM FOR DISTRIBUTING FAKED PERFORMANCE RESULTS

FROM:  SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
SEC Announces Charges and Asset Freeze Against Hedge Fund Advisory Firm Distributing Falsified Performance Results

The Securities and Exchange Commission filed fraud charges and sought emergency relief on May 5, 2014, against a New York-based investment advisory firm and two executives for distributing falsified performance results to prospective investors in two hedge funds they managed.

The SEC's complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York alleges that Aphelion Fund Management, LLC's (Aphelion) chief investment officer Vineet Kalucha fraudulently altered an outside audit firm's report reviewing the performance of an investment account he managed. Aphelion's chief financial officer George Palathinkal allegedly learned about Kalucha's falsifications, which essentially changed an investment loss into a major investment gain in the account. Nevertheless, the falsified report showing the phony gain instead of the actual loss was distributed to prospective investors. Furthermore, investors were separately provided false information about Aphelion's assets under management and Kolucha's litigation history.

Kalucha, who is majority owner and managing partner of the firm in addition to chief investment officer, also is charged with siphoning investor proceeds for his luxury car payments and settlements of legal actions against him personally that are unrelated to Aphelion.

In response to the SEC's request for emergency relief for investors, U.S. District Court Judge Jed S. Rakoff issued a temporary restraining order, imposed an asset freeze to protect client assets, and temporarily prohibited the defendants from soliciting new investors or additional investments from existing investors. A hearing on the SEC's motion for a preliminary injunction has been scheduled for May 15 before Judge Richard M. Berman.

According to the complaint, Aphelion serves as the investment adviser and general partner for two unregistered hedge funds: Aphelion US Fund LP and Aphelion Offshore Fund Ltd. Kalucha has been managing investor funds since 2009 using a proprietary investment model that he developed. The outside auditor's report showed an investment loss of more than 3 percent during a 15-month period in an account that Kalucha managed. However, the fraudulent report distributed to investors showed a phony investment gain of 30 percent during an 18-month period. In addition to distributing the altered report, Aphelion, Kalucha, and Palathinkal also misled investors about Aphelion's assets under management. While Kalucha and Palathinkal told investors at various times during 2013 that Aphielion had $15 million or more in assets under management, the firm never had more than $5 million in assets under management at any point during that year.

The complaint further alleges that the defendants misrepresented Kalucha's litigation history to investors. Under the legal proceedings section in a due diligence questionnaire included in Aphelion's marketing materials, Kalucha answered "None" and added a lengthy, materially misleading explanation of a civil proceeding in which he was involved. The proceeding, which he did not identify by name, was a case against him by the U.S. Department of Labor for breaching fiduciary duties. By virtue of a consent judgment in the case, Kalucha and Aphelion are prohibited from acting as investment advisers to many types of common retirement plans, which often invest in hedge funds. Investors were deprived of this information in the due diligence questionnaire.

According to the complaint, Aphelion, Kalucha, and Palathinkal raised $1.5 million in investments for Aphelion from 2013 to March 2014 by representing to investors that the funds would be used for Aphelion's operating expenses. Kalucha actually used more than 40 percent of the funds raised in 2013 for his personal benefit. He has withdrawn investor proceeds for such things as settlement of a foreclosure action involving his personal residence, settlement of a breach of contract action filed against him in his personal capacity, down payment of a luxury BMW sedan, and payment for tax and accounting services for his personal finances. Palathinkal approved all of Kalucha's withdrawals. The complaint alleges that Aphelion, Kalucha, and Palathinkal violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. In addition, the complaint alleges that Aphelion and Kalucha violated Sections 206(1), (2) and (4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Rule 206(4)-8 thereunder and that Palathinkal aided and abetted these violations.

The SEC's investigation and litigation have been conducted by David Benson, Paul Montoya, Eric Phillips, Delia Helpingstine, Kristine Rodriguez, and Joan Price-McLaughlin of the Chicago Regional Office.

Saturday, June 11, 2011

INVESTOR RECOVERY RIGHTS

Sometimes you can get money back when you have losses in the securities market. The following excerpt from the SEC blogsite gives details as to when and how your losses can be recouped:

“Often referred to as the "truth in securities" law, the Securities Act of 1933 has two basic objectives:
To require that investors receive financial and other significant information concerning securities being offered for public sale; and
To prohibit deceit, misrepresentations, and other fraud in the sale of securities.
The SEC accomplishes these goals primarily by requiring that companies disclose important financial information through the registration of securities. This information enables investors, not the government, to make informed judgments about whether to purchase a company's securities.
Here’s how an overview of how the registration process works. In general, all securities offered in the U.S. must be registered with the SEC or must qualify for an exemption from the registration requirements. The registration forms a company files with the SEC provide essential facts while minimizing the burden and expense of complying with the law. In general, registration forms call for:
A description of the company's properties and business;
A description of the security to be offered for sale;
Information about the management of the company; and
Financial statements certified by independent accountants.
Registration statements and prospectuses become public shortly after the company files them with the SEC. All companies, domestic and foreign, are required to file registration statements and other forms electronically. Investors can then access registration and other company filings using EDGAR.
Not all offerings of securities must be registered with the SEC. The most common exemptions from the registration requirements include:
Private offerings to a limited number of persons or institutions;
Offerings of limited size;
Intrastate offerings; and
Securities of municipal, state, and federal governments.
By exempting many small offerings from the registration process, the SEC seeks to foster capital formation by lowering the cost of offering securities to the public.
The SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance may examine a company’s registration statement to determine whether it complies with our disclosure requirements. But the SEC does not evaluate the merits of offerings, nor do we determine if the securities offered are "good" investments.
While our rules require that companies provide accurate and truthful information, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information in a company’s filings. In fact, every year we bring enforcement actions against companies who’ve "cooked their books" or failed to provide important information to investors. Investors who purchase securities and suffer losses should know that they have important recovery rights if they can prove that there was incomplete or inaccurate disclosure of important information.”
.