Search This Blog


This is a photo of the National Register of Historic Places listing with reference number 7000063

Monday, September 2, 2013

CFTC ANNOUNCES REPORT BY OTC DERIVATIVE REGULATORS TO THE G20

FROM:  U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
OTC Derivatives Regulators Issue Report to the G20

Washington, DC – Today, authorities with responsibility for the regulation of over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives markets in Australia, Brazil, the European Union, Hong Kong, Japan, Ontario, Quebec, Singapore, Switzerland and the United States issued a report regarding common understandings to improve the cross-border implementation of OTC derivatives reforms.  This report responds to an April 2013 request by the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors, urging key OTC regulators to intensify their efforts to address and resolve remaining cross-border conflicts, inconsistencies, gaps and duplicative requirements by the St. Petersburg Summit, which will take place on September 5-6, 2013.

The report reflects a number of substantive understandings to improve the cross-border implementation of OTC derivatives reforms, including the following:

• Early and comprehensive consultation among relevant authorities when equivalence or substituted compliance assessments are being undertaken is essential.

• A flexible, outcomes-based approach should form the basis of final assessments regarding equivalence or substituted compliance assessments.

• A “stricter-rule” approach would apply to address gaps in mandatory trading or clearing obligations.

• Authorities have a framework for consultation on mandatory clearing determinations.

• Jurisdictions should remove barriers (1) to reporting to trade repositories by market participants and (2) to access to trade repository data by authorities.

• There should be appropriate transitional measures and a reasonable but limited transition period for foreign entities to implement OTC derivatives reforms.

The report also recognizes that challenges will continue to arise in the implementation of OTC derivatives reforms and presents a number of additional topics for further discussion, including authorities’ direct access to registrant information and the treatment of foreign bank branches and guaranteed subsidiaries.

Finally, the report recognizes that open communication is vital to ensure there is common understanding of each jurisdiction’s processes and timelines to implement OTC derivatives reforms, and that flexibility in the application of cross-border regulation will be needed to make progress toward cross-border consistency.

Sunday, September 1, 2013

SEC CHARGES MAN AND COMPANY WITH TARGETING RETIREMENT SAVINGS INVOLVING PONZI SCHEME

FROM:  U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged a Noblesville, Ind., resident and his company with defrauding investors in a Ponzi scheme that targeted retirement savings. 

The SEC alleges that John K. Marcum touted himself as a successful trader and asset manager to raise more than $6 million through promissory notes issued by his company Guaranty Reserves Trust.  Marcum helped investors set up self-directed IRA accounts and gained control over their retirement assets, saying he would earn them strong returns on the promissory notes by day-trading in stocks while guaranteeing the safety of their principal investment.  Yet Marcum did little actual trading and almost always lost money when he did.  Throughout his scheme, Marcum provided investors with false account statements showing annual returns of more than 20 percent.  Meanwhile, he used investor funds to pay for his luxurious personal lifestyle and finance several start-up companies.

The SEC obtained an emergency court order to freeze the assets of Marcum and his company.

“Marcum tricked investors into putting their retirement nest eggs in his hands by portraying himself as a talented trader who could earn high returns while eliminating the risk of loss,” said Timothy L. Warren, Acting Director of the Chicago Regional Office.  “Marcum tried to carry on his charade of success even after he squandered nearly all of the funds from investors.”

According to the SEC’s complaint filed in federal court in Indianapolis, Marcum began his scheme in 2010.  Investors gave Marcum control of their assets by either rolling their existing IRA accounts into the newly-established self-directed IRA accounts or by transferring their taxable assets directly to brokerage accounts that Marcum controlled.  Marcum and certain investors co-signed the promissory notes, and Marcum then placed them in the IRA accounts.

The SEC alleges that Marcum assured investors he could safely grow their money through investments in widely-held publicly-traded stocks, and he promised annual returns between 10 percent and 20 percent.  Marcum also told a number of investors that their principal was “guaranteed” and would never be at risk.  He falsely told at least one investor that her principal would be federally insured.  In the little trading he has done, Marcum has suffered losses amounting to more than $900,000.  He has misappropriated the remaining investor funds for various unauthorized uses.

According to the SEC’s complaint, Marcum used investor money as collateral for a $3 million line of credit at the brokerage firm where he used to work.  He took frequent and regular advances from the line of credit to fund such start-up ventures as a bridal store, a bounty hunter reality television show, and a soul food restaurant owned and operated by the bounty hunters.  None of these businesses appear to be profitable, and Marcum’s investors were not aware that their money was being used for these purposes.  Marcum used nearly $1.4 million of investor money to make payments directly to the start-up ventures and other companies.  He also used more than a half-million dollars to pay personal expenses accrued on credit card bills, including airline tickets, luxury car payments, hotel stays, sports and event tickets, and tabs at a Hollywood nightclub.

According to the SEC’s complaint, Marcum did not have the funds needed to honor investor redemption requests.  So he provided certain investors with a “recovery plan” that revealed his intention to solicit funds from new investors so that he could pay back his existing investors.  Marcum had a phone conversation with three investors in June 2013 and admitted that he had misappropriated investor funds and was unable to pay investors back.  During this call, Marcum begged the investors for more time to recover their money.  He offered to name them as beneficiaries on his life insurance policies, which he claimed include a “suicide clause” imposing a two-year waiting period for benefits.  He suggested that if he is unsuccessful in returning their money, he would commit suicide to guarantee that they would eventually be repaid.

The SEC’s complaint alleges that Marcum and Guaranty Reserves Trust violated the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws.  The SEC sought and obtained emergency relief including a temporary restraining order and asset freeze.  The SEC additionally seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and financial penalties from Marcum and Guaranty Reserves Trust, and disgorgement of ill-gotten gains from Marcum Companies LLC, which is named as a relief defendant.

The SEC’s investigation was conducted by John J. Sikora, Jr., Brian D. Fagel, and Ann M. Tushaus in the Chicago Regional Office.  The SEC’s litigation will be led by Robert Moye.

Saturday, August 31, 2013

CFTC GETS INJUNCTION GETS INJUNCTION FORCING MAN AND COMPANY TO PAY RESTITUTION AND PENALTY

FROM:  U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

Federal Court in Maryland Orders Sidney J. Charles, Jr. and his Company, The Borrowing Station, LLC, to pay over $600,000 to Settle CFTC Forex Fraud Action

Washington, DC — The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) today announced that it obtained a federal court consent Order of permanent injunction requiring Defendants Sidney J. Charles, Jr., formerly of Bowie, Maryland, and his company, The Borrowing Station, LLC (Borrowing Station) of Bowie, Maryland, jointly and severally to pay $254,236 in restitution and a $350,000 civil monetary penalty in connection with an off-exchange leveraged foreign currency (forex) Ponzi scheme.

The Order, entered on August 23, 2013, by Judge Paul W. Grimm of the U.S. District Court of the District of Maryland, also imposes permanent registration and trading bans against both Defendants and prohibits them from further violations of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and CFTC Regulations, as charged. The court’s Order stems from a CFTC complaint filed on April 23, 2012, that charged Defendants with solicitation fraud, misappropriation, issuing false statements, and registration violations (see CFTC Press Release 6247-12).

The Order finds that, from at least October 2009 through at least July 2011, Defendants fraudulently solicited $369,326 from 18 individuals or entities for participation in a pooled investment vehicle managed by Borrowing Station, through Charles, that traded forex. According to the Order, Defendants solicited pool participants directly and through a website. In their solicitations, Defendants promised substantial investment returns such as 25 percent per year or 10 percent per month, and falsely claimed that pool participant funds were guaranteed against trading losses. The Order finds that Defendants deposited only a portion of pool participant funds into trading accounts and lost a majority of those funds unsuccessfully trading forex.

The Order also finds that Defendants issued checks to pool participants that represented purported “monthly returns” or “return on investment.” However, any purported profits that Defendants paid to pool participants came from the principal of other pool participants in the manner of a Ponzi scheme. In addition, Charles misappropriated pool participant funds to pay for personal expenses and to fund Borrowing Station’s operations, according to the Order.

The Order further finds that Borrowing Station and Charles failed to register as a Commodity Pool Operator (CPO) and Associated Person of a CPO, respectively, as required under the CEA and CFTC Regulations.

The CFTC appreciates the assistance of the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority.

CFTC Division of Enforcement staff responsible for this case are Kara Mucha, Kassra Goudarzi, Michael Solinsky, Gretchen L. Lowe, and Vincent A. McGonagle.

Friday, August 30, 2013

CFTC FILES TO REVOKE REGISTRATION OF COMMODITY TRADING ADVISOR

FROM:  COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 
CFTC Files Action to Revoke Registration of Commodity Trading Advisor Prestige Capital Advisors, LLC

Washington, DC- The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) today filed a Notice of Intent (Notice) to revoke the registration of Prestige Capital Advisors, LLC (Prestige) of Charlotte, North Carolina, as a Commodity Trading Advisor (CTA).

The CFTC Notice alleges that Prestige is subject to statutory disqualification from CFTC registration based on an Order of default judgment and permanent injunction entered against Prestige in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina on January 25, 2013 (see CFTC Press Release 6615-13). The Order finds that Prestige fraudulently solicited and accepted more than $4.7 million from multiple pool participants for investment in one or more commodity pools that traded among other things, commodities and futures contracts. The Order also finds that Prestige misappropriated pool participant funds, posted false trading returns on a website called BarclayHedge (where fund managers could post unverified historical returns for prospective clients to view), sent false trading results to at least one Prestige pool participant, and issued false account statements. As a result, Prestige was ordered to pay approximately $6.9 million in civil monetary penalties and restitution of over $4.1 million.

CFTC Division of Enforcement staff members responsible for this case are Eugenia Vroustouris, Daniel Jordan, Michael Loconte, Erica Bodin, Rick Glaser, and Richard Wagner.

Thursday, August 29, 2013

Statement Regarding Joint Rule Reproposal Concerning Credit Risk Retention

Statement Regarding Joint Rule Reproposal Concerning Credit Risk Retention

SEC CHARGES PRINCIPAL OF MEDICAL BUSINESS FOR ROLE IN FRAUD SCHEME

FROM:  SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
SEC Charges Principal of Purported Biomedical Company with Fraud

The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") filed a civil injunctive action on August 19, 2013 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana relating to Timothy E. Cook's fraudulent offer and sale of shares in his purported biomedical company, Xytos, Inc. (Xytos). The Commission charged Cook, of Indianapolis, and Xytos, a Nevada corporation based in Indianapolis, with securities fraud for engaging in a fraudulent scheme that garnered Cook more than $500,000 in illicit profits. The Commission also charged Cook and Asia Equities, Inc., a Nevada corporation Cook controlled, with related registration violations.

The Commission's complaint alleges that, between 2010 and March 2013, Cook misrepresented Xytos to the investing public as an operational biomedical company specializing in cancer treatment. Meanwhile, according to the compliant, Cook sold millions of his own Xytos shares on the open market and lived off the more than $400,000 in proceeds from those fraudulent sales.

The Commission's complaint alleges that Cook also raised over $100,000 from several private offerings of Xytos shares. The complaint further alleges that Cook, after soliciting private investors with false and misleading offering documents, misappropriated investor money to pay for personal expenses such as clothing and entertainment. Additionally, the complaint alleges that Cook concealed his fraud from Xytos shareholders through a series of misleading shareholder updates.

The Commission's complaint alleges that Cook and Xytos violated the antifraud provisions of the securities laws in Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act); that Cook aided and abetted these violations; and that Cook is liable for the Exchange Act violations as a control person of Xytos. Finally, the complaint alleges that Cook and Asia Equities engaged in unregistered offerings in violation of Section 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act. The Commission's complaint seeks permanent injunctions, civil penalties, disgorgement and prejudgment interest against all defendants. As to Cook, the complaint also seeks penny stock and officer and director bars.

The Commission acknowledges the assistance of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.