SEC ANNOUNCES CHARGES, ASSET FREEZE AGAINST UTAH RESIDENT AND INVESTMENT ADVISORY FIRM

FROM:  U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Litigation Release No. 23188 / February 5, 2015

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Total Wealth Management, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 15-CV-0226-BAS-DHB

SEC Obtains Emergency Relief Against San Diego Investement Advisor Charged with Wrongfully Taking Client Funds

The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced charges and an emergency temporary restraining order and asset freeze against a Utah resident and his San Diego, Calif. investment advisory firm.

The SEC alleges that Jacob Keith Cooper and Total Wealth Management Inc. wrongfully took at least $150,000 from clients in order to partially fund the potential settlement of an administrative proceeding previously instituted against them in 2014 by the SEC's Division of According to the SEC's complaint, filed yesterday in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, the Division of Enforcement had reached a tentative settlement with Cooper and Total Wealth in the previously-instituted administrative proceeding that required Cooper to escrow $150,000. However, after learning that Cooper intended to pay this amount using funds misappropriated from clients, the Division terminated this settlement and the agency brought this emergency action in federal district court. Cooper's use of investor funds for his settlement with the SEC was never disclosed to or authorized by clients, and was a breach of Total Wealth's and Cooper's fiduciary duty to their clients. According to the complaint, Cooper admitted to taking $150,000 in investor monies to fund his escrow settlement, although he claims that it was a "loan."

According to the complaint, Cooper has also admitted that he and Total Wealth have used investor monies to pay unspecified legal expenses related to the Division of Enforcement's previously-instituted administrative proceeding as well as a private class action lawsuit filed in California state court. The complaint alleges that Total Wealth has been charging investors unexplained, inflated "administrative fees" to pay those expenses and that Total Wealth and Cooper have failed to provide any accounting or meaningful explanation for the fees to investors, despite investors' repeated requests.

The Honorable Cynthia Bashant for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California issued an order temporarily enjoining Cooper and Total Wealth from future violations of Sections 206(1), 206(2), and 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and rule 206(4)-8 thereunder, as well as orders (1) freezing Cooper's and Total Wealth's assets; (2) appointing a temporary receiver; (3) prohibiting the destruction of documents, (4) expediting discovery; and (5) requiring accountings. Cooper and Total Wealth stipulated to the entry of the court orders without admitting or denying the SEC's allegations. The SEC also seeks preliminary and permanent injunctions, return of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest, and financial penalties against Cooper and Total Wealth.

A hearing on whether a preliminary injunction should be issued against the defendants and whether a permanent receiver should be appointed is scheduled for February 13, 2015.

SEC BRINGS FRAUD CHARGES AGAINST INVESTMENT ADVISORY FIRM, EXECUTIVES FOR FALSIFYING PERFORMANCE RESULTS

FROM:  U.S SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

May 8, 2014

The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced fraud charges and an asset freeze against a New York-based investment advisory firm and two executives for distributing falsified performance results to prospective investors in two hedge funds they managed.

The SEC alleges that Aphelion Fund Management’s chief investment officer Vineet Kalucha fraudulently altered an outside audit firm’s report reviewing the performance of an investment account he managed.  Aphelion’s chief financial officer George Palathinkal allegedly learned about Kalucha’s falsifications, which essentially changed an investment loss into a major investment gain in the account.  Nevertheless, the falsified report showing the phony gain instead of the actual loss was distributed to prospective investors.  Furthermore, investors were separately provided false information about Aphelion’s assets under management and Kolucha’s litigation history.

Kalucha, who is majority owner and managing partner of the firm in addition to chief investment officer, also is charged with siphoning investor proceeds for his luxury car payments and settlements of legal actions against him personally that are unrelated to Aphelion.

“We allege that on multiple occasions, Aphelion, Kalucha, and Palathinkal intentionally overstated the success of their investment strategy,” said Robert J. Burson, associate director of the SEC’s Chicago Regional Office.  “Kalucha also has been using investor money as his own, and emergency action was necessary to protect the interests of investors.”

In response to the SEC’s request for emergency relief for investors, U.S. District Court Judge Jed S. Rakoff issued a temporary restraining order, imposed an asset freeze to protect client assets, and temporarily prohibited the defendants from soliciting new investors or additional investments from existing investors.  A hearing on the SEC’s motion for a preliminary injunction has been scheduled for May 15 before Judge Richard M. Berman.

According to the SEC’s complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, Aphelion serves as the investment adviser and general partner for two unregistered hedge funds: Aphelion US Fund LP and Aphelion Offshore Fund Ltd.  Kalucha has been managing investor funds since 2009 using a proprietary investment model that he developed.  The outside auditor’s report showed an investment loss of more than 3 percent during a 15-month period in an account that Kalucha managed.  However, the fraudulent report distributed to investors showed a phony investment gain of 30 percent during an 18-month period.  In addition to distributing the altered report, Aphelion, Kalucha, and Palathinkal also misled investors about Aphelion’s assets under management.  While Kalucha and Palathinkal told investors at various times during 2013 that Aphielion had $15 million or more in assets under management, the firm never had more than $5 million in assets under management at any point during that year.

The SEC’s complaint further alleges that the defendants misrepresented Kalucha’s litigation history to investors.  Under the legal proceedings section in a due diligence questionnaire included in Aphelion’s marketing materials, Kalucha answered “None” and added a lengthy, materially misleading explanation of a civil proceeding in which he was involved.  The proceeding, which he did not identify by name, was a case against him by the U.S. Department of Labor for breaching fiduciary duties.  By virtue of a consent judgment in the case, Kalucha and Aphelion are prohibited from acting as investment advisers to many types of common retirement plans, which often invest in hedge funds.  Investors were deprived of this information in the due diligence questionnaire.

According to the SEC’s complaint, Aphelion, Kalucha, and Palathinkal raised $1.5 million in investments for Aphelion from 2013 to March 2014 by representing to investors that the funds would be used for Aphelion’s operating expenses.  Kalucha actually used more than 40 percent of the funds raised in 2013 for his personal benefit.  He has withdrawn investor proceeds for such things as settlement of a foreclosure action involving his personal residence, settlement of a breach of contract action filed against him in his personal capacity, down payment of a luxury BMW sedan, and payment for tax and accounting services for his personal finances.  Palathinkal approved all of Kalucha’s withdrawals.

The SEC’s complaint alleges that Aphelion, Kalucha, and Palathinkal violated the antifraud provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  In addition, the complaint alleges that Kalucha and Aphelion Fund Management violated, and Palathinkal aided and abetted violations of, the antifraud provisions of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

The SEC’s investigation and litigation have been conducted by David Benson, Paul Montoya, Eric Phillips, Delia Helpingstine, Kristine Rodriguez, and Joan Price-McLaughlin of the Chicago Regional Office.

SEC OBTAINS ASSET FREEZE AGAINST ALLEGED FRAUDSTER

FROM:  U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

SEC Obtains Asset Freeze and Other Relief Against Michael P. Zenger

On January 31, 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission obtained a temporary restraining order and an emergency asset freeze in an offering fraud orchestrated by Lehi, Utah resident Michael P. Zenger (Zenger).

The complaint alleges that since June 2013, Zenger solicited at least $200,000 from two friends for the purported purpose of trading futures contracts, commodities, and government securities. While Zenger used some investor money as represented, the complaint alleges that Zenger misappropriated approximately $100,000 of the $200,000 he raised to pay personal expenses, including airplane rentals, monthly credit card bills, payments to BMW and Mercedes Benz, purchases at Saks Fifth Avenue, Nordstrom and Costco, and other personal expenses.

The Commission's complaint charges Zenger with violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The complaint seeks a preliminary and permanent injunction as well as disgorgement, prejudgment interest and civil penalties from Zenger.

The SEC's investigation was conducted by Jennifer Moore and Scott Frost; the litigation will be led by Thomas Melton.

TRADER GETS BUSTED BY SEC FOR PLACEMENT OF OWN TRADES BEFORE THOSE OF CLIENTS

FROM: U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 
Washington, D.C., May 24, 2013 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced fraud charges and an asset freeze against a trader at a Dallas-based investment advisory firm who improperly profited by placing his own trades before executing large block trades for firm clients that had strong potential to increase the stock's price.

The SEC alleges that Daniel Bergin, a senior equity trader at Cushing MLP Asset Management, secretly executed hundreds of trades through his wife's accounts in a practice known as front running. Bergin illicitly profited by at least $520,000 by routinely purchasing securities in his wife's accounts earlier the same day he placed much larger orders for the same securities on behalf of firm clients. Bergin concealed his lucrative trading by failing to disclose his wife's accounts to the firm and avoiding pre-clearance of his trades in those accounts. Bergin also attempted to hide his wife's accounts from SEC examiners.

"Bergin betrayed the trust of his clients by secretly using information about their trades to gain an unfair trading advantage and reap massive profits for himself," said Marshall S. Sprung, Deputy Chief of the SEC Enforcement Division's Asset Management Unit.

According to the SEC's complaint filed yesterday in federal court in Dallas, many investment advisers to institutions employ traders to manage their exposure to market price risks and place these large client orders in advantageous market centers with sufficient trading quantities that minimize unfavorable price movements against client interests. Bergin is the trader primarily responsible for managing price exposures related to client orders for equity trades.

"Bergin's misconduct is particularly egregious because his firm depended on him to manage market exposure and risk for its investments. Instead, he pitted his clients' financial interests against his own," said David R. Woodcock, Director of the SEC's Fort Worth Regional Office.

According to the SEC's complaint, Bergin realized at least $1.7 million in profits in his wife's accounts from 2011 to 2012 as a result of his illegal same-day or front-running trades. More than $520,000 of the $1.7 million represents profits from approximately 132 occasions in which Bergin placed his initial trades in his wife's account ahead of clients' trades.

According to the SEC's complaint, more than $1.8 million was withdrawn since July 2012 from a trading account belonging to Bergin's wife that was undisclosed to his firm. Most of the withdrawals were large transfers to her bank account.

The SEC's complaint names Bergin's wife Jacqueline Zaun as a relief defendant for the purpose of recovering Bergin's illegal trading profits in her accounts.

In order to halt Bergin's ongoing scheme, the SEC requested and U.S. District Court Judge Barbara Lynn granted an emergency court order freezing the assets of Bergin and Zaun.

The SEC's complaint alleges that Bergin violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 as well as Section 17(j) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and Rule 17j-1. The complaint seeks disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and a penalty as well as a permanent injunction against Bergin.

The SEC's investigation was conducted in the Fort Worth Regional Office by Frank Goodrich and Barbara Gunn of the Asset Management Unit. The litigation will be led by Jennifer Brandt and Mr. Goodrich. The examination that led to the investigation was conducted by Mary Walters, Anthony McNeal, Charles Amsler, Brandon Whitaker, Carol Hahn, Dennis Rogers, and Kim Shaw of the Fort Worth office.

The SEC appreciates the assistance of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Texas and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

CFTC CHARGES NORTH CAROLINA RESIDENT CHARGED WITH COMMODITY POOL FRAUD

FROM: COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION FOREX

CFTC Charges North Carolina Resident James Harvey Mason with Commodity Pool Fraud

Federal court issues emergency order freezing assets and protecting books and records of Mason, The JHM Forex Only Pool, and Forex Trading at Home

Washington, DC - The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) today announced that Judge Graham Mullen of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina entered an emergency Order freezing and preserving assets under the control of defendant James Harvey Mason of Graham, North Carolina, and relief defendants The JHM Forex Only Pool (JHM) and Forex Trading at Home (FTAH). The Order also prohibits Mason, JHM, and FTAH from destroying books and records, appoints a receiver to protect customer funds, and grants the CFTC immediate access to the records of the defendant and his agents.

The Order arises out of a civil enforcement Complaint filed by the CFTC on March 27, 2013, charging Mason with fraudulently soliciting, accepting, and pooling at least $1.1 million from at least 60 individuals to participate in off-exchange foreign currency (forex) commodity pools and misappropriating at least $600,000 of participant funds.

According to the CFTC’s Complaint, Mason fraudulently told pool participants and prospective pool participants that they would be at no risk of losing their principal and would instead make profits of as much as 500 percent annually if they invested with one or both of JHM and FTAH. In fact, the Complaint alleges that the forex accounts traded lost more than $1 million since July 2010. The Complaint further alleges that Mason failed to register with the CFTC as a Commodity Pool Operator and also failed to disclose to participants that he had a conviction in 2000 for wire fraud in connection with the sale of commodities.

In its continuing litigation, the CFTC seeks a permanent injunction from future violations of federal commodities laws, permanent registration and trading bans, restitution to defrauded pool participants, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, and civil monetary penalties.

The CFTC appreciates the assistance of the North Carolina Secretary of State’s Securities Division and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of North Carolina.

CFTC Division of Enforcement staff members responsible for this case are Barry R. Blankfield, Jennifer E. Smiley, Heather Johnson, Patricia Gomersall, Joseph Konizeski, Scott Williamson, Rosemary Hollinger, Joan Manley, and Richard B. Wagner

ASSET FREEZE ANNOUNCED BECAUSE OF SUSPICIOUS TRADING AHEAD OF H.J. HEINZ ACQUISITION

FROM: U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C., Feb. 15, 2013 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today obtained an emergency court order to freeze assets in a Zurich, Switzerland-based trading account that was used to reap more than $1.7 million from trading in advance of yesterday’s public announcement about the acquisition of H.J. Heinz Company.

The SEC’s immediate action ensures that potentially illegal profits cannot be siphoned out of this account while the agency’s investigation of the suspicious trading continues.

In a complaint filed in federal court in Manhattan, the SEC alleges that prior to any public awareness that Berkshire Hathaway and 3G Capital had agreed to acquire H.J. Heinz Company in a deal valued at $28 billion, unknown traders took risky bets that Heinz’s stock price would increase. The traders purchased call options the very day before the public announcement. After the announcement, Heinz’s stock rose nearly 20 percent and trading volume increased more than 1,700 percent from the prior day, placing these traders in a position to profit substantially.

"Irregular and highly suspicious options trading immediately in front of a merger or acquisition announcement is a serious red flag that traders may be improperly acting on confidential nonpublic information," said Daniel M. Hawke, Chief of the Division of Enforcement’s Market Abuse Unit.

Sanjay Wadhwa, Senior Associate Director of the SEC’s New York Regional Office, added, "Despite the obvious logistical challenges of investigating trades involving offshore accounts, we moved swiftly to locate and freeze the assets of these suspicious traders, who now have to make an appearance in court to explain their trading if they want their assets unfrozen."

The SEC alleges that the unknown traders were in possession of material nonpublic information about the impending acquisition when they purchased out-of-the-money Heinz call options the day before the announcement. The timing and size of the trades were highly suspicious because the account through which the traders purchased the options had no history of trading Heinz securities in the last six months. Overall trading activity in Heinz call options several days before the announcement had been minimal.

The emergency court order obtained by the SEC freezes the traders’ assets and prohibits them from destroying any evidence. The SEC’s complaint charges the unknown traders with violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. In addition to the emergency relief, the SEC is seeking a final judgment ordering the traders to disgorge their ill-gotten gains with interest, pay financial penalties, and be permanently barred from future violations.

The SEC’s expedited investigation is being conducted by Market Abuse Unit members Megan Bergstrom, David S. Brown, and Diana Tani in the Los Angeles Regional Office with substantial assistance from Charles Riely, Market Abuse Unit member in the New York Regional Office who will handle the SEC’s litigation. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the Options Regulatory Surveillance Authority (ORSA).

"SKY-HIGH" YIELDS, SECRET EUROPEAN TRUST AND, SEC CHARGES OF INVESTOR FRAUD

FROM: U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C., Nov. 19, 2012 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged the operators of a long-running prime bank scheme with defrauding investors who were promised sky-high returns on loans to a secret European trust. It also is seeking an emergency court order to freeze the operators’ assets for the benefit of investors.

The SEC alleges that Billy W. McClintock, who lives in Florida, and Dianne Alexander, a former Georgia resident who now lives in California and also is known as Linda Dianne Alexander, raised $15 million from at least 220 investors in more than 20 states, primarily Georgia. McClintock portrayed himself as the "U.S. Director" of a secret European trust that had the power to create money and claimed to have appointed Alexander as a "U.S. Regional Director" for the trust. McClintock and Alexander led investors to believe that they could receive 38 percent annual interest on loans to the trust, provided they abide by the trust’s strict rules requiring secrecy. However, investor money was instead used to merely pay other investors, the hallmark of a Ponzi scheme.

"McClintock and Alexander pitched an investment opportunity that simply did not exist. They merely reshuffled funds between investors in a modern take on a classic prime bank scheme," said William P. Hicks, Associate Director of Enforcement in the SEC’s Atlanta Regional Office.

According to the SEC’s complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, McClintock and Alexander began conducting the scheme by at least 2004 and misrepresented or omitted facts about investment risks, expected returns, and how investor funds would be used. The complaint charges McClintock and Alexander with violating the securities registration, broker-dealer registration, and antifraud provisions of the U.S. securities laws and a related SEC anti-fraud rule.

The SEC’s complaint also names as relief defendants two entities that McClintock controls — MSC Holdings USA LLC, and MSC Holdings Inc. — and another entity controlled by Alexander — MSC GA Holdings LLC. The SEC believes the three firms may have received ill-gotten assets from the fraud that should be returned to investors.

Information on how to avoid prime bank frauds is available at: http://www.sec.gov/divisions/enforce/primebank.shtml and


http://investor.gov/investing-basics/avoiding-fraud/types-fraud/prime-bank-investments

The SEC’s investigation, which is continuing, has been conducted by Natalie M. Brunson and Lucy T. Graetz of the SEC's Atlanta Regional Office under the supervision of Aaron W. Lipson. Senior Trial Counsel Pat Huddleston II will lead the litigation. The SEC acknowledges the assistance of the U. S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Georgia and the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Atlanta Division in this matter.

SEC ANNOUNCES ASSET FREEZE AGAINST MONEY MANAGER AND HEDGE FUND ADVISORY FIRM

The following excerpt is from the SEC website: Washington, D.C., August 31, 2011 – The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced an asset freeze against a Chicago-area money manager and his hedge fund advisory firm that the SEC charged with lying to prospective investors in their startup quantitative hedge fund. A federal court today entered a preliminary injunction order in the case, which was unsealed earlier this week. The SEC alleges that Belal K. Faruki of Aurora, Ill., and his advisory firm Neural Markets LLC solicited highly sophisticated individuals to invest in the "Evolution Quantitative 1X Fund," a hedge fund they managed that supposedly used a proprietary algorithm to carry out an arbitrage strategy involving trading in liquid exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Faruki and Neural Markets falsely represented the existence of investor capital and that trading was generating profits when, in fact, losses were being incurred. They defrauded at least one investor out of $1 million before confessing the losses, and were soliciting other wealthy investors before the SEC obtained a court order to halt the scheme. "Faruki and Neural Markets lied throughout this elaborate scheme in order to attract capital from sophisticated investors," said Bruce Karpati, Co-Chief of the Asset Management Unit in the SEC's Division of Enforcement. "Even sophisticated institutional investors should be wary of unscrupulous hedge fund managers who cloak their misrepresentations in lofty pitches about a complex investment strategy." According to the SEC's complaint filed in federal court in Chicago, Faruki and Neural Markets told investors that their hedge fund began trading in 2009. From January 2010 until at least October 2010, Faruki and Neural Markets distorted the hedge fund's performance track record, misrepresented that wealthy investors had invested $5 million in the fund, and misstated that it had engaged a top-tier auditor to assist in preparing the fund's quarterly and annual financial statements. Faruki also falsely told investors that he had invested his own money in the hedge fund so that his interests were aligned with the other supposed investors. According to the SEC's complaint, Faruki boasted that he was making his investors rich at a time when he actually had no investors. He falsely stated that the names of other wealthy investors had to remain confidential because they did not want their identities revealed. The lone investor in the hedge fund has unsuccessfully attempted to redeem his investment and recover the remaining balance of his funds from Faruki and Neural Markets, who in turn threatened that they would use the investor's funds to defend themselves if help was sought from regulators. The SEC filed its complaint under seal on Aug. 10, 2011, and that same day the court granted the SEC's request for emergency relief including a temporary restraining order and asset freeze. The court lifted the seal order on August 29, and the preliminary injunction order entered today with the defendants' consent continues the terms of the temporary restraining order until the final resolution of the case.”

SEC GETS EMERGENCY ASSET FREEZE AGAINST THE ASSOCIATION FOR BETTERMENT THROUGH EDUCATION AND LOVE INC.

Unauthorized securities is something that the SEC frowns on a great deal. In the following case a charity like entity ran a fowl of the SEC by allegedly selling unregistered securities. The following is an excerpt from the SEC web site:

“The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that it charged Association for Betterment through Education and Love, Inc. (“ABEL”) and its principal, Anthony O. DeGregorio, Sr., age 81 and resident of New Jersey, with offering and selling securities in unregistered transactions and obtained an emergency court order to halt the offerings and preserve assets for investors. The Complaint also names Margherita DeGregorio as a relief defendant.

The Commission's complaint, filed in the District of New Jersey, alleges that ABEL and DeGregorio have raised more than $1.3 million through unregistered securities offerings since ABEL’s inception in 1989, obtaining more than $1 million in the last four years through offering purported “CDs.” According to the Complaint, ABEL’s purported purpose was to invest funds raised in securities offerings and use investment profits to pay a “guaranteed” return to investors, and donate a portion to charity. The Complaint alleges that ABEL and DeGregorio offered securities in the form of charitable gift annuities, without complying with state registration requirements, and offered purported CDs that carried above-market interest rates. The Complaint also charges that, at times, ABEL used the proceeds from new offerings of securities to make promised interest payments to earlier investors.
The Complaint charges ABEL and DeGregorio with violating Sections 5(a) and (c) of the Securities Act of 1933.
Judge Freda L. Wolfson of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey issued a temporary restraining order, which prohibits ABEL and DeGregorio from committing further violations of the federal securities laws and places a freeze on their assets and the assets of Margherita DeGregorio. In its enforcement action, the Commission is seeking additional relief, including orders enjoining ABEL and DeGregorio, preliminarily and permanently, from committing future violations of the foregoing federal securities laws, and a final judgment ordering ABEL and DeGregorio to disgorge their ill-gotten gains plus prejudgment interest, and assessing civil penalties against them.”