CFTC CHARGES MAN AND COMPANY WITH RUNNING A SILVER BULLION PONZI SCHEME

FROM:  COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
CFTC Charges Ronnie Gene Wilson of South Carolina and His Company, Atlantic Bullion & Coin, Inc., with Operating a $90 Million Silver Bullion Ponzi Scheme

Defendants are allegedly to have fraudulently sold contracts of sale of silver in a nationwide scheme
Washington, DC – The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) today announced the filing of a federal civil enforcement action charging defendants Ronnie Gene Wilson (Wilson) and Atlantic Bullion & Coin, Inc. (AB&C), both of Easley, S.C., with fraud in connection with operating a $90 million Ponzi scheme, in violation of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and CFTC regulations.

The CFTC’s complaint charges violations under the agency’s new Dodd-Frank authority prohibiting the use of any manipulative or deceptive device, scheme, or contrivance to defraud in connection with a contract of sale of any commodity in interstate commerce in violation of Section 6(c)(1) of the CEA, as amended, to be codified at 7 U.S.C. §§ 9, 15 and the CFTC’s implementing Regulation 180.1 (a). The complaint was filed on June 6, 2012, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of South Carolina, Anderson Division.

According to the complaint, since at least 2001 through February 29, 2012, Wilson and AB&C operated a Ponzi scheme, and, as part of the scheme, fraudulently offered contracts of sale of silver, a commodity in interstate commerce. Through their 11-year long scheme, the defendants allegedly fraudulently obtained at least $90.1 million from at least 945 investors for the purchase of silver.

From August 15, 2011, through February 29, 2012 – the time period during which the CFTC has had jurisdiction over the defendants’ actions under new provisions contained in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 – the defendants allegedly fraudulently obtained at least $11.53 million from at least 237 investors in 16 states for the purchase of contracts of sale of silver. The complaint further alleges that during this period, the defendants failed to purchase any silver whatsoever. Instead, the defendants allegedly misappropriated all of the investors’ funds and to conceal their fraud, issued phony account statements to investors.

In its continuing litigation, the CFTC seeks restitution to defrauded investors, a return of ill-gotten gains, civil monetary penalties, trading and registration bans, and permanent injunctions against further violations of the federal commodities laws.

The CFTC appreciates the cooperation and assistance of the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Greenville, S.C., and the U.S. Secret Service.

CFTC Division of Enforcement staff responsible for this case are A. Daniel Ullman II, George H. Malas, Antoinette Chance, John Einstman, Richard Foelber, Paul G. Hayeck, and Joan M. Manley.

CFTC ORDERS NEVADA COMPANY TO PAY $2.6 MILLION FOR ALLEGED FOREX FRAUD

FROM:  COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
CFTC Orders Nevada Resident Luis Salazar-Correa and His Company, Prosperity Team, LLC, to Pay More than $2.6 Million to Settle CFTC Anti-fraud Forex Action
Washington, DC – The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) today filed and simultaneously settled charges against Luis Salazar-Correa of Las Vegas, Nev., and his Nevada-based company, Prosperity Team, LLC, for fraudulently soliciting individuals to participate in a pooled investment vehicle, misappropriating customer funds, and issuing false statements to conceal trading losses and the fraud.

The CFTC order requires Salazar-Correa and Prosperity Team jointly and severally to pay a $1 million civil monetary penalty and restitution of $1,641,000. The order permanently prohibits Salazar-Correa and Prosperity Team from engaging in certain commodity-related activities, including trading, and from registering or seeking exemption from registration with the CFTC. The order also permanently prohibits the respondents from further violations of the Commodity Exchange Act, as charged.

The order finds that from about February 2009 through at least June 2010, Salazar-Correa and Prosperity Team fraudulently solicited and accepted at least $2,482,000 from at least 183 customers primarily for the purpose of trading leveraged or margined off-exchange foreign currency (forex) contracts through a pool investment vehicle, also known as Prosperity Team. In soliciting potential customers, Salazar-Correa falsely guaranteed monthly returns varying from 10 percent to 25 percent, depending on the amount invested, and misrepresented the risks of trading forex, the order finds.

Rather than achieving the claimed returns, the respondents consistently sustained trading losses, which cumulated in overall losses of approximately $1,566,000, and operated a Ponzi scheme by misappropriating customers’ funds to make payments to other customers, the order finds.

Salazar-Correa and Prosperity Team concealed the massive trading losses and their misappropriation of customer funds by issuing false statements, which were accessible to customers online through Prosperity Team’s website, the order finds.

The CFTC appreciates the assistance of the U.S. Attorney’s Office and Federal Bureau of Investigation in Las Vegas, Nev., the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission, the International Financial Services Commission of Belize, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority, and the U.K. Financial Services Authority.

CFTC Division of Enforcement staff members responsible for this case are Alison Wilson, Jonathan Huth, Heather Johnson, Brandon Tasco, Gretchen L. Lowe, and Vincent A. McGonag

MORGAN STANLEY ORDERED BY CFTC TO PAY $5 MILLION PENALTY

FROM:  U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
CFTC Orders Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC to Pay $5 Million Civil Monetary Penalty for Unlawful Noncompetitive Trades
Morgan Stanley had inadequate supervisory systems and controls to detect and deter the unlawful conduct that occurred repeatedly over 18-months
Washington, DC – The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) today issued an order filing and settling charges that, over an 18-month period, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC (Morgan Stanley), a registered futures commission merchant (FCM), unlawfully executed, processed, and reported numerous off-exchange futures trades to the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) and Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) as exchanges for related positions (EFRPs). The CFTC order requires Morgan Stanley to pay a $5 million civil monetary penalty and to cease and desist from further violations of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and CFTC regulations, as charged.

According to the CFTC order, because the futures trades were executed noncompetitively and not in accordance with exchange rules governing EFRPs, they constituted “fictitious sales” and resulted in the reporting of non-bona fide prices, in violation of the CEA and CFTC regulations. The order also finds that Morgan Stanley had related supervisory and recordkeeping violations.

The commodity futures trading laws generally require that futures trades be executed on a futures exchange. The laws allow for exceptions to that requirement, such as when the futures trade is part of an EFRP, which is where parties exchange futures contracts for a related cash or over-the-counter (OTC) derivative position, such as an option or a swap. As long as the legal requirements are met, parties are permitted to execute EFRPs away from an exchange but then must report their EFRPs to an exchange after execution.
“The laws requiring that futures trades be executed on an exchange serve important price discovery and transparency principles,” said David Meister, Director of the CFTC’s Division of Enforcement. “As today’s action should demonstrate, when an FCM reports that it properly conducted an off-exchange futures trade as part of an EFRP, that report had better be accurate. In all cases, firms must have appropriate systems and controls in place designed to detect and prevent the conduct described in the order.”
According to the CFTC’s order, from at least April 18, 2008 through October 29, 2009, Morgan Stanley noncompetitively executed numerous futures trades and improperly reported them as EFRPs, since they did not have the required corresponding cash or OTC derivative positions.

The order finds that Morgan Stanley’s supervisory systems and internal controls were not adequate to detect and deter the noncompetitive trading of futures contracts improperly designated as EFRPs. For example, although Morgan Stanley’s Futures Operations department had the responsibility to report EFRPs to the CME and CBOT, that department was not required to verify that the EFRPs had the required corresponding related cash or OTC derivative positions, nor was any other operations department required to do so. The order further finds that Morgan Stanley failed to ensure that its employees involved in the execution, handling and processing of EFRPs understood the requirements for executing bona fide EFRPs. Moreover, the order finds that Morgan Stanley lacked sufficient surveillance systems to identify trades improperly designated as EFRPs. The order also finds that Morgan Stanley failed to designate the trades as EFRPs on all orders, records, and memoranda pertaining to EFRPs, as required.

The order recognizes Morgan Stanley’s significant cooperation in the Division of Enforcement’s investigation of this matter.

In a related proceeding, the CME Group is issuing a notice of disciplinary action against Morgan Stanley today. The CFTC thanks the CME Group for its assistance.
CFTC Division of Enforcement staff members responsible for this case are Brian G. Mulherin, Timothy M. Kirby, Brandon T. Tasco, Gretchen L. Lowe, and Vincent A. McGonagle.

SEC CHARGES THREE FORMER CONSOL ENERGY, INC. EMPLOYEES WITH ILLEGAL TRADING IN ADVANCE OF AN ACQUISITION ANNOUNCEMENT

FROM:  U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
June 1, 2012
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that on June 1, 2012, it filed a civil action against three former employees of CONSOL Energy, Inc. (“CONSOL”) for illegal insider trading in CONSOL securities in advance of the company’s public announcement, on March 15, 2010, that it entered into an agreement to acquire the Appalachian Exploration and Production business of Dominion Resources, Inc. (“Dominion”). The Commission alleges that on March 9, 2010, both Charles E. Mazur Jr., CONSOL’s former Director of Corporate Strategy, and Joseph A. Cerenzia, CONSOL’s former Director of Public Relations, received a confidential email stating that the acquisition of Dominion was going to be announced prior to the opening of the market on March 15, 2010. Both individuals traded CONSOL securities after learning of the pending acquisition announcement. James S. Poland, CONSOL’s former General Manager of Engineering, conducted an environmental survey in connection with the of the Dominion acquisition. Poland also traded CONSOL stock after receiving nonpublic information about the acquisition and when it would be announced.

The Commission’s complaint alleges that Mazur violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Rules 10b-5(a) and (c) thereunder, and alleges that Poland and Cerenzia violated of Sections 17(a)(1) and (3) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”), Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5(a) and (c) thereunder, and seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement, prejudgment interest and civil penalties.

The defendants agreed to settle the Commission’s charges, without admitting or denying the allegations in the Commission’s complaint. Under the settlements, the defendants consented to Final Judgments that will permanently enjoin Mazur from violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder; and permanently enjoin Poland and Cerenzia from violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. Mazur agreed to pay approximately $97,171 in disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil penalties. Poland agreed to pay approximately $19,600 in disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil penalties. Cerenzia agreed to pay approximately $15,453 in disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil penalties. The settlements are subject to court approval.

OPPENHEIMER FUNDS INC., WILL PAY $35 MILLION TO SETTLE SEC MISLEADING STATEMENT CHARGES

FROM:  U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C., June 6, 2012 – The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged investment management company OppenheimerFunds Inc. and its sales and distribution arm with making misleading statements about two of its mutual funds struggling in the midst of the credit crisis in late 2008.

The SEC’s investigation found that Oppenheimer used derivative instruments known as total return swaps (TRS contracts) to add substantial commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) exposure in a high-yield bond fund called the Oppenheimer Champion Income Fund and an intermediate-term, investment-grade fund called the Oppenheimer Core Bond Fund. The 2008 prospectus for the Champion fund didn’t adequately disclose the fund’s practice of assuming substantial leverage in using derivative instruments. And when declines in the CMBS market triggered large cash liabilities on the TRS contracts in both funds and forced Oppenheimer to reduce CMBS exposure, Oppenheimer disseminated misleading statements about the funds’ losses and their recovery prospects.

Oppenheimer agreed to pay more than $35 million to settle the SEC’s charges.

“Mutual fund providers have an obligation to clearly and accurately convey the strategies and risks of the products they sell,” said Robert Khuzami, Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement. “Candor, not wishful thinking, should drive communications with investors, particularly during times of market stress.”

Julie Lutz, Associate Director of the SEC’s Denver Regional Office, added, “These Oppenheimer funds had to sell bonds at the worst possible time to raise cash for TRS contract payments and cut their CMBS exposure to limit future losses. Yet, the message that Oppenheimer conveyed to investors was that the funds were maintaining their positions and the losses were recoverable.”

According to the SEC’s order instituting settled administrative proceedings against OppenheimerFunds and OppenheimerFunds Distributor Inc., the TRS contracts allowed the two funds to gain substantial exposure to commercial mortgages without purchasing actual bonds. But they also created large amounts of leverage in the funds. Beginning in mid-September 2008, steep CMBS market declines drove down the net asset values (NAVs) of both funds. These losses forced Oppenheimer to raise cash for month-end TRS contract payments by selling securities into an increasingly illiquid market.

According to the SEC’s order, the funds’ portfolio managers under instruction from senior management began executing a plan in mid-November to reduce CMBS exposure. Just as they began to do so, however, the CMBS market collapse accelerated, creating staggering cash liabilities for the funds and driving their NAVs even lower.

The SEC’s order found that continued CMBS declines forced the funds to sell more portfolio securities in order to raise cash for anticipated TRS contract payments. This task became increasingly difficult for the Champion fund, ultimately prompting Oppenheimer to make a $150 million cash infusion into the fund on November 21. Over the next two weeks, the funds continued to reduce their CMBS exposure to avoid further losses.

According to the SEC’s order, Oppenheimer advanced several misleading messages when responding to questions in the midst of these events. For instance, Oppenheimer

communicated to financial advisers (whose clients were invested in the funds) and fund shareholders directly that the funds had only suffered paper losses and their holdings and strategies remained intact. Oppenheimer also stressed that absent actual defaults, the funds would continue collecting payments on the funds’ bonds as they waited for markets to recover. These communications were materially misleading because the funds were committed to substantially reducing their CMBS exposure, which dampened their prospects for recovering CMBS-induced losses. Moreover, the funds had been forced to sell significant portions of their bond holdings to raise cash for anticipated TRS contract payments, resulting in realized investment losses and lost future income from the bonds.

The SEC’s investigation found that the Champion fund’s 2008 prospectus was materially misleading in describing the fund’s “main” investments in high-yield bonds without adequately disclosing the fund’s practice of assuming substantial leverage on top of those investments. While the prospectus disclosed that the fund “invested” in “swaps” and other derivatives “to try to enhance income or to try to manage investment risk,” it did not adequately disclose that the fund could use derivatives to such an extent that the fund’s total investment exposure could far exceed the value of its portfolio securities and, therefore, that its investment returns could depend primarily upon the performance of bonds that it did not own.

The SEC’s order finds that OppenheimerFunds violated Section 34(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, Sections 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act), and Section 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Rule 205(4)-8 promulgated thereunder. The order finds that OppenheimerFunds Distributor violated Sections 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act.

Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, OppenheimerFunds agreed to pay a penalty of $24 million, disgorgement of $9,879,706, and prejudgment interest of $1,487,190. This money will be deposited into a fund for the benefit of investors. OppenheimerFunds and OppenheimerFunds Distributor also agreed to provisions in the order censuring them and directing them to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations or future violations of these statutes and rules.

The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Coates Lear, Jeffrey E. Oraker, Hugh C. Beck, Patricia E. Foley, and Mary S. Brady in the Denver Regional Office. The related examination of Oppenheimer was conducted by Francesco Spinella, Tracy O’Sullivan, C. Michael Hooper, Kathleen A. Raimondi, and Paula S. Weisz under the supervision of branch chief Kenneth O’Connor and assistant director Dawn Blankenship in the New York Regional Office.

THE PENNY STOCK COMPANY ROUNDUP FOR ALLEGED FRAUD

FROM:  U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANG COMMISSION
Washington, D.C., June 4, 2012 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged several penny stock companies and their officers as well as three penny stock promoters involved in various stock schemes in which bribes and kickbacks were paid to hype microcap stocks and illegally generate stock sales.

These charges are the latest in a series of cases in which the SEC has worked closely with the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida and the Federal Bureau of Investigation to uncover penny stock schemes. Prior charges were filed by the SEC against other penny stock violators in October 2010, December 2010, and June 2011.

According to the SEC's complaints filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, some of these latest schemes involved the payment of undisclosed kickbacks to a pension fund manager in exchange for the fund's purchase of restricted shares of stock in the various microcap companies. Other schemes involved an undisclosed bribe that was to be paid to a stockbroker who agreed to purchase a microcap company's stock in the open market for his customers' discretionary accounts.

"The company officers and promoters in many of these schemes disguised their kickbacks as payments to phony consulting companies that performed no actual work," said Eric I. Bustillo, Director of the SEC's Miami Regional Office. "These illegal activities were fully intended to artificially inflate the stock volume and prices of these penny stock companies to the detriment of investors."

The SEC's complaints allege the following penny stock companies and individuals perpetrated the various stock schemes:
Angel Acquisition Corp. (AGEL) based in Carson City, Nev., and Carlsbad, Calif. (now known as Biogeron Inc.)
President and CFO Harold Steven Bonenberger of Carlsbad.


Clean Coal Technologies Inc. (CCTC) based in New York City.
President and CEO Douglas D. Hague of Boca Raton, Fla.


Cotton & Western Mining Inc. (CWRN) based in Humble, Texas.
President and CEO Robert L. Cotton of Houston.


Delivery Technology Solutions Inc. (DTSL) based in Boca Raton.
CEO and Chairman Ryan F. Coblin of Boca Raton.


Optimized Transportation Management Inc. (OPTZ) based in San Antonio
CEO Kevin P. Brennan of Pittsburgh.
OPTZ stock promoter Marc S. Page of Tiburon, Calif.
OPTZ stock promoter Donald G. Huggins of St. Petersburg, Fla.


Sure Trace Security Corp. (SSTY) based in Philadelphia.
Chairman and former president Michael M. Cimino of Philadelphia.
President Joseph J. Repko of Hobe Sound, Fla.


US Farms Inc. (USFM) based in San Diego and Fallbrook, Calif.
President and CEO Yan K. Skwara of San Diego.


Wound Management Technologies Inc. (WNDM) based in Fort Worth, Texas, and Fort Lauderdale, Fla.
President, CEO, and Chairman Scott Haire of Fort Worth and Coral Springs, Fla.


The SEC additionally charged a stock promoter involved in pumping the stock of KCM Holdings Corp., a penny stock company charged in the SEC's series of penny stock enforcement actions in June 2011. The SEC alleges that Matthew A. Connor, who lives in Amherst, Va., participated in a fraudulent scheme to hype KCM Holding's stock.
The U.S. Attorney's Office today announced criminal charges against the same individuals facing SEC civil charges.

The SEC's complaints allege that these companies, officers, and stock promoters violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The SEC is seeking financial penalties, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains plus prejudgment interest, and permanent injunctions against all the defendants. The SEC also seeks penny stock bars against each of the officers and promoters as well as officer-and-director bars against Bonenberger, Brennan, Cimino, Hague, Haire, and Skwara.

The SEC's investigation was conducted in the Miami Regional Office by senior counsels Trisha D. Sindler and Michelle I. Bougdanos under the supervision of Assistant Regional Director Chedly C. Dumornay. The SEC's litigation will be led by C. Ian Anderson, Edward D. McCutcheon, and James M. Carlson. The SEC acknowledges the assistance and cooperation of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida and the FBI's Miami Division in these investigations.