Search This Blog


This is a photo of the National Register of Historic Places listing with reference number 7000063

Friday, November 2, 2012

SEC MOVES TO BLOCK SALES OF COMPANY'S SHARES OF STOCK

FROM: U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C., Oct. 29, 2012 — The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it has instituted proceedings to determine whether to issue an order that would prevent sales of shares in Caribbean Pacific Marketing, Inc., based on allegations that the company's disclosure is misleading.

"The Division of Enforcement is seeking a stop order to protect investors by preventing any potential sales of stock under a materially misleading and deficient offering document," said Eric I. Bustillo, Director of the SEC's Miami Regional Office.

A stop order prevents a company or its shareholders from selling privately-held shares to the public under a materially misleading or deficient registration statement. If a stop order is issued, no new shares can enter the market pursuant to that registration statement until the company has corrected the deficiencies or misleading information contained in the registration statement.

In proceedings instituted against Caribbean Pacific on October 29, 2012, the SEC's Division of Enforcement alleges that Caribbean Pacific's registration statement is materially misleading because it omits any information about William J. Reilly and his position within the company as a de facto executive officer and control person. The Division of Enforcement alleges that Reilly is a disbarred attorney subject to a court order barring him from any penny stock offering, from serving as a corporate office and director, and from violating certain federal securities laws. In addition, Reilly was suspended from appearing or practicing before the Commission as an attorney, with a right to reapply after three years.

The Commission instituted the proceedings against Caribbean Pacific to determine whether the allegations by the Division of Enforcement are true, to give the company an opportunity to respond to the allegations, and to determine whether a stop order should be issued.

On October 23, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida filed a criminal complaint against Reilly, alleging securities fraud.

SEC Senior Counsels Trisha D. Sindler and Michelle I. Bougdanos are conducting the SEC's investigation under the supervision of Assistant Regional Director Chedly C. Dumornay, and Adam Schwartz and Christine Nestor will handle the litigation. All are with SEC's Miami Regional Office. The SEC acknowledges the assistance and cooperation of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida and the FBI's Miami Division in this matter.

Thursday, November 1, 2012

INSURANCE COMPANY CEO CHARGED WITH INSIDER TRADING

FROM: U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SEC Charges Denver-Based Insurance Executive With Insider Trading

On October 26, 2012, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged an insurance company CEO with insider trading based on confidential information he obtained in advance of a private investment firm acquiring a significant stake in a Denver-based oil and gas company.

The SEC alleges that Michael Van Gilder learned from a Delta Petroleum Corporation insider that Beverly Hills-based Tracinda – which has previously owned large portions of companies such as MGM Resorts International, General Motors, and Ford Motor Company – was planning to acquire a 35 percent stake in Delta Petroleum for $684 million. Van Gilder subsequently purchased Delta Petroleum stock and highly speculative options contracts. He tipped several others, encouraging them to do the same, including a pair of relatives via an e-mail with the subject line "Xmas present." After Tracinda's investment was publicly announced, Delta Petroleum's stock price shot up by almost 20 percent. Van Gilder and his tippees made more than $161,000 in illegal trading profits.

The U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Colorado today announced a parallel criminal action against Van Gilder.

According to the SEC's complaint filed in federal court in Denver, Van Gilder is the CEO of Van Gilder Insurance Company. He obtained the confidential information about Tracinda's proposed investment and loaded up on Delta Petroleum stock and options in November and December 2007. He then tipped his broker, a co-worker, and relatives.

The SEC alleges that a mere two minutes after speaking to his source at Delta Petroleum on December 22, Van Gilder e-mailed two relatives with the "Xmas present" subject line and stated, "my present (just kidding) is that I can't stress enough the opportunity right now to buy Delta Petroleum." That same day, Van Gilder contacted his broker and arranged to purchase more Delta stock and options for himself. Following the public announcement, Van Gilder reaped approximately $109,000 in illegal profits and his broker, co-worker, and a relative made approximately $52,000.

The SEC's complaint charges Van Gilder with violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5, and seeks a final judgment ordering him to disgorge his and his tippees' ill-gotten gains and pay prejudgment interest and a financial penalty, and permanently enjoining him from future violations of these provisions of the federal securities laws.

Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Chairman Schapiro Statement on Reopening of Securities Markets

Chairman Schapiro Statement on Reopening of Securities Markets

ALLEGED FRAUD BY KOHL'S MERCHANDISE EXECUTIVE

FROM: U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 
On October 24, 2012, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged Michael Johnson, a divisional merchandise manager at Kohl's, which is a national department store. The complaint alleged that Johnson assisted the financial fraud at Carter's, Inc, an Atlanta-based manufacturer of children's clothing. Specifically, the SEC alleges that Johnson assisted Joseph Elles, a former Executive Vice President of Sales at Carter's, in concealing his financial fraud from senior Carter's management. That scheme caused Carter's to materially misstate its net income and expenses in several financial reporting periods between 2004 and 2009.

The SEC's complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, alleges that between 2004 and 2009, Elles fraudulently manipulated the amount of discounts that Carter's granted to Kohl's, Carter's largest wholesale customer in order to induce Kohl's to purchase greater quantities of Carter's clothing for resale. In an effort to conceal the scheme, Elles persuaded Kohl's to defer subtracting the discounts from payments until later periods. Elles also persuaded Johnson, who handled the Carter's account at Kohl's to sign a false confirmation that misrepresented to Carter's accounting personnel the timing and amount of those discounts. By concealing the amount of discounts that had been promised to Kohl's, Elles and Johnson caused Carter's to materially understate it expenses in certain quarters and materially overstate its earnings in those quarters.

After conducting its own internal investigation, Carter's was required to issue restated financial results for the affected periods.

The SEC's complaint alleges that Johnson violated Rule 13b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"), which prohibits any person from directly or indirectly falsifying or causing to be falsified an issuer's accounting records. The complaint also alleges that Johnson aided and abetted Elles' violations of Section 13b(5) of the Exchange Act, which among other things, prohibits any person from knowingly falsifying the books, records and/or accounts of an issuer, and Rule 13b2-1 thereunder. The SEC is seeking permanent injunctive relief and financial penalties against Johnson.

This is the third case that the SEC has filed in this continuing investigation. The Commission previously charged Joseph Elles (see
SEC v. Joseph Elles, Litigation Release No. 21784 / December 20, 2010) and Joseph Pacifico (see Litigation Release No. 22517 / October 19, 2012). When the Commission announced the first case, the Commission also announced that it had entered into a non-prosecution agreement with Carter's, based in part on Carter's prompt and complete self-reporting of the misconduct to the SEC, its exemplary and extensive cooperation in the investigation, including undertaking a thorough and comprehensive internal investigation, and Carter's extensive and substantial remedial actions. See Release No. 2010-252 / December 20, 2010. Pursuant to that agreement, Carter's has continued to cooperate during the Commission's continuing investigation.

Remarks at the George Washington University Center for Law, Economics and Finance Fourth Annual Regulatory Reform Symposium

Remarks at the George Washington University Center for Law, Economics and Finance Fourth Annual Regulatory Reform Symposium

Monday, October 29, 2012

FORMER J.CREW EXECUTIVE CHARGED WITH INSIDER TRADING

FROM: U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that it filed an insider trading civil action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Frank A. LoBue, a former Director of Store Operations at J.Crew Group, Inc. (J.Crew). The complaint alleges that LoBue used material, nonpublic information about sales and expenses of the company’s stores to purchase J.Crew common stock in advance of earnings announcements in May and August 2009.

The Commission’s complaint alleges that in the course of his employment LoBue regularly received nonpublic information about J.Crew’s "Stores" component, which comprised approximately 70% of the company’s sales. In April and May 2009, LoBue received several reports containing information about J.Crew’s expenses, payroll costs, and store sales results for the company’s fiscal first quarter ended May 2, 2009. The reports showed results that were better than expected. The complaint further alleges that LoBue breached duties he owed to the company and its shareholders by using the information to purchase 2,300 shares of J.Crew stock in advance of the company’s May 28, 2009 quarterly earnings release. The market reacted positively to the release, with J.Crew’s stock closing up 26.4% from its prior close.

The complaint also alleges that in July and August 2009 LoBue continued to receive the reports on J.Crew stores, including stores’ sales figures, and that the information showed that the company was experiencing an improving sales trend. The complaint alleges that LoBue again breached his duties by using this information to purchase another 11,680 shares of J.Crew stock ahead of the company’s August 27, 2009 second quarter earnings release. The day following the release, J.Crew stock closed up 6.01% from its prior close. LoBue’s aggregate illicit profits from trading alleged in the complaint were at least $60,735.60. J.Crew terminated LoBue’s employment in February 2010.

Without admitting or denying the allegations in the complaint, LoBue has consented to the entry of a proposed final judgment permanently enjoining him from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder; ordering him to pay disgorgement of $60,735.60, plus prejudgment interest thereon of $6,749.33; and imposing a civil penalty in the amount of $60,735.60. The proposed settlement is subject to the approval of the District Court.

The Commission acknowledges the assistance of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.