SEC OBTAINS WIN IN PENNY STOCK FRAUD CASE

FROM:  SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
SEC Obtains Summary Judgment Win On Liability Against All Defendants in a Penny Stock Fraud Case

On February 19, 2014, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York in Albany, New York granted the Securities and Exchange Commission's motion for summary judgment on liability against all defendants, StratoComm Corporation; its CEO Roger D. Shearer; and its former Director of Investor Relations, Craig Danzig, on all charges against them, including violations of the antifraud provisions and registration requirements of the federal securities laws.

The SEC alleged that StratoComm, acting at Shearer's direction and with Danzig's assistance, issued and distributed public statements falsely portraying the penny stock company as actively engaged in the manufacture and sale of telecommunications systems for use in underdeveloped countries, particularly Africa. In reality, the company had no product and no revenue. The SEC argued that StratoComm, Shearer and Danzig sold investors more than $4 million worth of StratoComm stock in unregistered transactions. The SEC also alleged that Shearer used much of that money for his own purposes, including to help pay restitution he owed in connection with his guilty plea in a prior criminal proceeding.

In granting summary judgment in favor of the SEC, the court found that StratoComm violated Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The court also found that Shearer violated Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act, aided and abetted StratoComm's violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and found him liable as a control person for StratoComm's violations. Finally, the court found that Danzig violated Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act, violated Section 15(a) of the Exchange Act, and aided and abetted StratoComm's violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.

Statement on Proposed SEC Budget for Fiscal 2015

Statement on Proposed SEC Budget for Fiscal 2015

COURT ORDERS ARIZONA MAN TO PAY OVER $1.2 MILLION STEMMING FROM SOLICITATION FRAUD CASE

FROM:  COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 
Federal Court Orders Arizona Resident Ray Thomas Brown to Pay over $1.2 Million for Solicitation Fraud and Misappropriation in Operating Two Commodity Scams

Washington, DC – The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) today announced that Judge Frederick J. Martone of the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona granted the CFTC’s motion for summary judgment and entered an Order of permanent injunction against Defendant Ray Thomas Brown, of Phoenix, Arizona. The Order imposes permanent trading and registration bans against Brown and requires him to pay restitution and disgorgement totaling $1,131,941.98 and a civil monetary penalty of $140,000.

The Order stems from a CFTC Complaint filed on November 26, 2012 (see CFTC Press Release 6448-12, December 6, 2012), charging Brown with fraud, misappropriation, and registration violations in operating two scams, one involving fraud while acting as a Commodity Pool Operator (CPO) and the other involving fraud while acting as a Commodity Trading Advisor (CTA). Brown duped customers into sending at least $1.2 million to bank and trading accounts under his control, according to the Complaint. The CFTC Complaint also charged Brown with illegally operating as an unregistered CPO and CTA.

The Order finds that Brown fraudulently solicited approximately $1,163,519 from more than 200 individuals. Of that amount, Brown deposited only approximately $86,000 into commodity pool trading accounts, which was promptly lost in trading. The Order also finds that Brown used the bulk of the funds he solicited on personal expenses and to further his fraudulent scheme. In making his solicitations, Brown lied about his background, fabricated his past and present investment performance, disseminated false account statements, and failed to disclose that he was not registered with the CFTC in any capacity, according to the Order.

A Related Criminal Action

In a related criminal action, Brown pleaded guilty on May 7, 2013, to wire fraud. Brown is currently awaiting sentencing (United States v. Ray Thomas Brown, Case No. 8:13-cr-00035-UA (United States District Court for the Central District of California)).

The CFTC thanks the United States Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Black Mountain Precinct of the Phoenix Police Department, and the Arizona Corporation Commission for their assistance and cooperation on this matter.

CFTC Division of Enforcement staff members responsible for this case are Dmitriy Vilenskiy, Jonathan Robell, Richard Foelber, Paul Hayeck, and Joan Manley.

SEC ALLEGES FORMER REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE STOLE FROM INVESTOR'S ACCOUNT

FROM:  SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SEC Charges Former Registered Representative with Fraud

The Securities and Exchange Commission has charged Kevin P. O'Brien (O'Brien), a former registered representative, with fraud in connection with the misappropriation of over $298,000 from the account of a customer between 1998 and 2008. O'Brien has agreed to settle the charges, without admitting or denying the allegations in the Commission's complaint.

The Commission's complaint, filed February 21, 2014, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, alleges that, from at least 1998 through August 2008, while working as a registered representative, O'Brien engaged in a fraudulent scheme to misappropriate money from a customer. The complaint alleges that O'Brien caused checks to be issued in the customer's name from the customer's account, picked up the checks from a post office box that he controlled, and deposited them into a bank account in the customer's name. The complaint further alleges that O'Brien withdrew the money from his customer's bank account, which O'Brien had the ability to control, and used the money for personal expenses unrelated to the customer.

O'Brien has consented to the entry of a final judgment that permanently enjoins him from future violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The final judgment also orders disgorgement of $298,917, plus prejudgment interest of $54,020, but waives the payment of all disgorgement and all prejudgment interest based upon O'Brien's inability to pay. The Commission also did not seek a civil money penalty based upon O'Brien's inability to pay.

ALLEGED FUNDS MISAPPROPRIATION GENERATES A GRAND JURY INDICTMENT

FROM:  SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
Jeremy Fisher Indicted for Fraud

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on February 5, 2014, a Grand Jury in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida returned an Indictment charging Jeremy S. Fisher with four counts of wire fraud. The Indictment also seeks forfeiture of property obtained as a result of the alleged criminal violations.

The Indictment alleges that from at least August 2009 through December 2012, Fisher raised approximately $1.04 million from approximately 18 investors who invested in unregistered securities offerings conducted by Fisher through his companies. Fisher offered investors the opportunity to invest their money through a “special trading platform” that supposedly generated significant returns. Fisher told investors that their money would be deposited in an overseas bank account and used as collateral for the purchase and sale of collateralized debt obligations and medium term notes on the trading platform. However, Fisher instead fraudulently misappropriated and converted investors' funds for his personal use to pay previous investors, to purchase a house and car and to pay his daughter's tuition and other personal and business expenses. Fisher also provided quarterly statements to investors which falsely represented that investors were earning money on their investments.

The Indictment's allegations are based on the same conduct underlying the Commission's September 30, 2013 Complaint against Fisher filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. The Commission charged Fisher and his two companies with violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The Complaint also charged Fisher with violations of Section 15(a) of the Exchange Act. The defendants entered into consents with the Commission agreeing to the entry by the Court of the relief requested in the complaint, including orders of permanent injunction and disgorgement, plus prejudgment, totaling $936,226 to be paid jointly and severally among the defendants. Fisher has also agreed to pay a civil penalty of $150,000. On October 16, 2013, the Court entered the Final Judgments against Fisher and his companies.

ATTORNEY SETTLES CLAIMS HE MADE FALSE AND MISLEADING STATEMENTS TO INVESTORS

FROM:  SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
SEC Settles Claims Against Attorney Retained by Funds Involved in Fraudulent Investment Scheme

The United States District Court for the District of Oregon has entered final judgment against Oregon attorney Robert Custis pursuant to a settlement resolving claims brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission.  The Commission’s complaint alleged that Mr. Custis was retained to perform work for investment funds run by Yusaf Jawed and that he made false and misleading statements to the funds’ investors.

The Commission’s previously-filed complaint alleged that Mr. Jawed and two entities he controlled, Grifphon Asset Management, LLC and Grifphon Holdings, LLC, defrauded more than 100 investors in the Pacific Northwest and across the country as part of a long-running Ponzi scheme that raised more than $37 million.  The complaint alleged that Mr. Custis was retained in 2009 and began sending updates to Mr. Jawed’s investors regarding the status of a purported purchase of the funds’ assets that would allow investors to redeem their shares of the funds for a profit.  The complaint alleges that the statements regarding the asset purchase were false and that the investors were never paid.

Mr. Custis agreed to settle the Commission’s charges without admitting or denying the allegations.  The District Court entered final judgment on February 13, 2014, permanently enjoining Mr. Custis from violating Sections 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Section 206(4) and Rule 206(4)-8 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.    

On February 27, 2014, pursuant to an offer of settlement submitted by Mr. Custis, the Commission issued an order prohibiting Mr. Custis from appearing or practicing before the Commission as an attorney under Rule 102(e) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice.